It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: daskakik
a reply to: TheBadCabbie
So on Oct. 31 they are talking about taking the country back and by Nov 12 they were saying we planned to lose, after it looked like Trump had lost.
Seems legit.
***The rant below has nothing to do withthe card question. It's just a rant about the distractions we've been seeing lately***
originally posted by: Guyfriday
a reply to: carewemust
Due to -Q- very cryptic style they come across more autistic than artistic in their talent. This is why I would have loved it if they would just come out and drop a truth bomb without any of the tomfoolery of solving clues and hints. If -Q- just posted something that hasn't already been figured out by those following them, then I think that both people who doubt and people who blindly follow, would change their resolution toward the whole -Q- messages.
Have you read them all together as a body of work?
NEW RUMOR VS. REALITY
Reality: The existence of a vulnerability in election technology is not evidence that the vulnerability has been exploited or that the results of an election have been impacted. Technology has vulnerabilities. Identifying and mitigating vulnerabilities is an important security practice.
Rumor: Vulnerabilities in election technology mean that elections have been hacked and hackers are able to change election results.
originally posted by: Guyfriday
Anyone know what that card looks like without a person in front of it? I think everyone knows where I'm going with this.
originally posted by: Guyfriday
OK, so there is a picture that was posted by Mr Pool that showed a Queen of Hearts card with a flipped mouth and nose. If the card that was used for these people to stand in front of looks the same, that could be important to people looking for links.