It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: McGinty
originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: JinMI
I'm sorry to interfere in your dialogue.
It seems to me that the reaction of the United States and NATO to Russia's actions in Ukraine speaks about the consistency of these actions.
Agree - this is very likely.
AND about SWIFT. This threat is exclusively for domestic use in Western countries. This measure cannot cause real damage to Russia since 2018. Russia has ready-made alternative systems.
The occupation of Ukraine will slow down Russia's economic development. Therefore, this will not happen. Oddly enough, Putin tells the truth more often than you think. The problem is that few people read his statements in full.
The occupation of any other country of the former USSR will also slow down Russia's economic development. Therefore, this will not happen. Quite recently, there were problems between Armenia and Azerbaijan, there were problems in Kazakhstan, and problems in Belarus. But there is no occupation anywhere. Although there were opportunities. Occupation is generally an outdated technology of the 19th and not the 21st century. In modern realities, this is not effective.
No one is going to restore the Soviet Union. This is no longer possible. Society is used to living in a new reality, technology has stepped forward, the Russian leadership assesses prospects differently. The Eurasian Economic Union is being built. By and large, the Russian leadership wants NATO countries not to interfere with Russia's development. Hence all the demands and actions of Russia on the world stage
originally posted by: IAMTAT
Can someone tell me who is responsible for sending the Ukrainians the Javelin anti-tank weapons...they are using so effectively against Russian tanks?
Was it Obama, Trump or Biden?