AIDS Is Only Weeks Away For Some Tripple Vaxxt Brits

originally posted by: AaarghZombies
a reply to: v1rtu0s0

And what about the people who are scientists or who are medically trained and know what they're talking about?

What about who? What do they know that I don't? Oh, wait, appeal to authority...

originally posted by: AaarghZombies
a reply to: Itisnowagain

Is that old fashioned?

It really depends on how you define "old fashioned".

I suppose that you would have to define how the viral vector actually operates first.

Do you know if the spike protein is actually contained in the vaccine syringe before it enters the human body?

Or is the spike genetic code inserted into the genetically modified monkey adenovirus and then the spike is manufactured by the human cells after the shot has been administered?


Basically...
Is it 'a vaccine in which a dead bit of the naughty virus is jabbed into your arm'?

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

its the greatest pharma swindle of all time

they made a virus , released it then made a #e vaccine that doesnt do anything but make you sick and so become dependent on more pharma products to sustain your life while you slowly die.

All the while stealing tax payers money and shirking the liability of court damages, and to top it all off the politicians that legislated it all more than likely all have shares or are account holders within these pharma groups so they got to skim their little piece off the top and stick it away in their offshore accounts while flaunting all the rules and laughing at the silly citizens who believe they live in a democracy.

the #ers should burn and their buildings of authority should be raised to the ground then we should write lovely books about the history of it all so we never forget how absolutely criminal it all was.

a reply to: AaarghZombies

If it's capitalized as AIDS, then it's caused by HIV. Because it's a specific thing.

Not according to the CDC.

People receive an AIDS diagnosis when

• they develop certain OIs, or
  
• their CD4 cell count drops below 200 cells per milliliter of blood.

The diagnosis of AIDS is based on opportunistic infections (OIs) or the CD4 cell count, not on whether or not the person has been diagnosed with HIV. The term AIDS was coined when HIV was diagnosed; a diagnosis of AIDS does not, however, depend on a previous diagnosis of HIV. AIDS is caused by HIV; the final stage of HIV is AIDS; it still does not follow that nothing else can possibly cause AIDS.

HIV is one of two specific species of lentivirus. It is a specific type of virus. AIDS is a result of a long-term infection of the HIV virus. It is a set of symptoms indicating a malfunction in the body. They are not synonymous!

I don't know how much clearer I can make this: the article that started all this did not suggest that the vaccine caused HIV. It claimed that the vaccine could cause AIDS, which is a different diagnosis.

Just because the MSM uses terms like AIDS and HIV loosely (and even tries to substitute them interchangeably in some cases) it does not follow that the terms are interchangeable. It simply means the MSM are not doctors nor medical researchers. They are pretty faces with strong voices who talk real good-like and parrot whatever they are told to say.

I'll credit SkepticScot the credit for easy access to the CDC's definition. In trying to prove something untrue, he (again) disproved his own points. Comedy gold, that fellow!

TheRedneck

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
a reply to: frogs453

100% of vaccinated people will die. Eventually.

Dude.

Talk about shower thoughts.

a reply to: frogs453

Honestly, the entire thing on both sides of the coin has been psychological warfare. Everything was a "covid death" from car wrecks to heart attacks. While it was a different virus all it really amounted to was the flu. It definitely sucked to have. Like the flu a lot of people legitimately died from it, but without a doubt they inflated the numbers. All I can offer as evidence at the moment is anecdotal.

The vaccine is equally inflated in vilification.

The big difference is there are genuine concerns over what longterm effects it will have. I do know the vaccine doesn't work all that well. Too many people have gotten the vid with the vaccine. My own dad had a severe bout of "long covid" even with all his boosters. It was completely debilitating, and we genuinely thought he was going to die.

The real issue is the precedent. All it takes to establish authoritarian control across the world is something just a tad bit worse. It's eerie

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: putnam6

I don't imagine "full immunity" is completely possible.

As to "mask up and wash your hands too".

The former you should do when appropriate the latter, you should always do.

Even so here's is

COVID Booster Loses Potency After 4 Months, Fauci Says 'There May Be the Need' for Fourth Dose
news.yahoo.com...

So what happens when the 4th booster loses potency? doesn't that mean is COVID still around we will need boosters every 3 months?

and we haven't even talked about long COVID a very real and troublesome scenario, filled with continued hospital visits or medications or treatments
insurers may or may not pay for?

www.newsy.com...

New data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) finds that the mRNA shot's protection begins to decline after about four months, according to a study released Friday.

Although vaccine effectiveness against COVID-related hospitalizations was at 91 percent during the first two months after a third dose, it decreased to 78 percent by the fourth month.

edit on 21-2-2022 by putnam6 because: (no reason given)

originally posted by: TheRedneck
a reply to: AaarghZombies

If it's capitalized as AIDS, then it's caused by HIV. Because it's a specific thing.

Not according to the CDC.

People receive an AIDS diagnosis when

• they develop certain OIs, or
  
• their CD4 cell count drops below 200 cells per milliliter of blood.

The diagnosis of AIDS is based on opportunistic infections (OIs) or the CD4 cell count, not on whether or not the person has been diagnosed with HIV. The term AIDS was coined when HIV was diagnosed; a diagnosis of AIDS does not, however, depend on a previous diagnosis of HIV. AIDS is caused by HIV; the final stage of HIV is AIDS; it still does not follow that nothing else can possibly cause AIDS.

HIV is one of two specific species of lentivirus. It is a specific type of virus. AIDS is a result of a long-term infection of the HIV virus. It is a set of symptoms indicating a malfunction in the body. They are not synonymous!

I don't know how much clearer I can make this: the article that started all this did not suggest that the vaccine caused HIV. It claimed that the vaccine could cause AIDS, which is a different diagnosis.

Just because the MSM uses terms like AIDS and HIV loosely (and even tries to substitute them interchangeably in some cases) it does not follow that the terms are interchangeable. It simply means the MSM are not doctors nor medical researchers. They are pretty faces with strong voices who talk real good-like and parrot whatever they are told to say.

I'll credit SkepticScot the credit for easy access to the CDC's definition. In trying to prove something untrue, he (again) disproved his own points. Comedy gold, that fellow!

TheRedneck

You missed this part out of your quoted text.

AIDS (acquired immunodeficiency syndrome) is the most severe stage of HIV (Stage 3

AIDS is caused by HIV.

Still waiting for you to say what else causes AIDS.

originally posted by: marg6043
a reply to: v1rtu0s0

Since the jabs for covid started, I seen an increase of ads in the media for treatments for AIDS, something I found odd, especially when is obvious pharma is pushing treatments, now the new mRNA AID jab is offered for those that wants to be in trials.

I was wondering why soo much push for AIDS treatments, when AIDS is been around since the 80s and the cocktail for AIDS seems to be working just fine.

I noticed it but shrugged it off. But now I've begun hearing ads on radio addressing stroke & heart attack being repeated every hour or so... why are people suddenly needing to be hyper-vigilant about these things unless they have a reason to be?

a reply to: Itisnowagain

😄 No, indeed it’s not old fashioned in the grand scheme of things. But possibly by comparison to mRNA it appears to have been superseded.

I was aware of the fun chimp factoid-hemroid, but thanks for confirming that. It’s the kind of stuff one knows because one read it, but one still hasn’t really a clue what it means.

I live in hope that someone here is equipped to answer the original question from p.1 regarding perceived risks from mRNA vs that from AZ adenovirus; does the doom porn apply to both, or just the former?

originally posted by: seattlerat

originally posted by: marg6043
a reply to: v1rtu0s0

Since the jabs for covid started, I seen an increase of ads in the media for treatments for AIDS, something I found odd, especially when is obvious pharma is pushing treatments, now the new mRNA AID jab is offered for those that wants to be in trials.

I was wondering why soo much push for AIDS treatments, when AIDS is been around since the 80s and the cocktail for AIDS seems to be working just fine.

I noticed it but shrugged it off. But now I've begun hearing ads on radio addressing stroke & heart attack being repeated every hour or so... why are people suddenly needing to be hyper-vigilant about these things unless they have a reason to be?

www.abovetopsecret.com...

originally posted by: filthyphilanthropist
a reply to: frogs453

Honestly, the entire thing on both sides of the coin has been psychological warfare. Everything was a "covid death" from car wrecks to heart attacks. While it was a different virus all it really amounted to was the flu. It definitely sucked to have. Like the flu a lot of people legitimately died from it, but without a doubt they inflated the numbers. All I can offer as evidence at the moment is anecdotal.

The vaccine is equally inflated in vilification.

The big difference is there are genuine concerns over what longterm effects it will have. I do know the vaccine doesn't work all that well. Too many people have gotten the vid with the vaccine. My own dad had a severe bout of "long covid" even with all his boosters. It was completely debilitating, and we genuinely thought he was going to die.

The real issue is the precedent. All it takes to establish authoritarian control across the world is something just a tad bit worse. It's eerie

www.abovetopsecret.com...

originally posted by: TheRedneck
a reply to: ScepticScot

What other causes of AIDs are there?

In the context of this article, potentially the vaccines. It does not indicate that the vaccines will give someone HIV.

HIV is not near as transmissible as Covid so there is no comparison.

HIV is not an airborne virus. However, contact with HIV-infected bodily fluids is near 100% transmissible. In sports, isolation from bodily fluids is nearly inevitable... blood from minor injuries, sweat, shared showers, etc.

TheRedneck

This isn’t accurate if you’re including saliva as a bodily fluid?as you can quote safely kiss someone who is HIV+.

The last one tho 😄

You cannot catch HIV from:

-Kissing
-Giving mouth-to-mouth resuscitation (the "kiss of life")
-Being sneezed on by someone with HIV
-Sharing baths, towels or cutlery with someone with HIV
-Swimming in a pool that's been used by someone with HIV
-Sitting on a toilet seat that someone with HIV has sat on

www.nhs.uk...

I give up folks. You win.

AIDS is HIV. The article meant HIV. HIV is AIDS. HIV is safe. AIDS is safe. The vaccine is safe. The Chinese virus is death. TAKE YOUR DAMN VACCINE!

I'm out of here before my allergy to stupidity puts me in anaphylactic shock. Unless some of you want to argue that doesn't exist either.

Stay ignorant guys!

TheRedneck

originally posted by: TheRedneck
I give up folks. You win.

AIDS is HIV. The article meant HIV. HIV is AIDS. HIV is safe. AIDS is safe. The vaccine is safe. The Chinese virus is death. TAKE YOUR DAMN VACCINE!

I'm out of here before my allergy to stupidity puts me in anaphylactic shock. Unless some of you want to argue that doesn't exist either.

Stay ignorant guys!

TheRedneck

It's not ignorance, they know very well what's going on.

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

What does it matter to you since we will all apparently be dead with AIDS in mere weeks?

As to what's going on well in your head that's plainly clear.

As to what Doctors know that you don't, i imagine that information is rather extensive and could fill volumes.

Seek help Dr Qanonanut.

Canny wait to hear your excuse in a few weeks as to why your nonsense AIDS doom porn failed to transpire or materialise.

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: Ksihkehe

Every single day going forward is always an unknown Ksihkehe.

Thats how life works.

The statement i made stands, my immunity is fine, and mRNA vaccines don't cause AIDS.

This nonsense has already been debunked back in in October of last year as is plainly clear and the link to the information posted.

So, you're just confirming what I said. Both sides are out of control.

You are claiming something for which there is no historical data to support. You're pushing misinformation, but it's actually a straight up lie. You have no evidence of how fine your immune system is. AIDS may be far fetched but there are dozens of valid concerns about the vaccines.

I don't see a distinction between ignoring science to claim the vaccine is bad and ignoring science to prove the vaccine is good. Accepting what you know and what you don't is vital to science, pretending that the long-term effects from pharmaceuticals are non-existent doesn't make you better than OP. It doesn't make your delusions any less unscientific than the OP. There is no long-term data, you are the long term-study.

Accept it without equivocating that every day is an unknown, that's bs. You known damn well that it's not the same thing and that mentality should never be applied when billions of lives are on the line hinging on the decisions of a small group of people.

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: v1rtu0s0

What does it matter to you since we will all apparently be dead with AIDS in mere weeks?

As to what's going on well in your head that's plainly clear.

As to what Doctors know that you don't, i imagine that information is rather extensive and could fill volumes.

Seek help Dr Qanonanut.

Canny wait to hear your excuse in a few weeks as to why your nonsense AIDS doom porn failed to transpire or materialise.

You seem so triggered by it though. If I'm so wrong why bother responding? I think we know why.


Yes, so any random doctor spends years studying vaccines and not just seeing patients everyday and telling them nothings wrong with them and giving them prescriptions as encouraged by big pharma. What's that? They don't spend a lot of time studying vaccines?

Yes, it's impossible for anyone without an MD by their name to have common sense and do their own research or understand things that doctors who just see patients as essentially big pharmas middle man would do. Except, I'd bet the average person could easier gain more knowledge than an average doctor who has to be both a jack of all trades, master of none, and a big pharma drug pusher. Meanwhile your average guy can focus on a sliver of information and know more about it by doing their own research. That is unless you use the magical appeal to authority fallacy. Lemme guess, only a mechanic knows anything about my car engine and its impossible for me to figure that out too?

originally posted by: AaarghZombies
a reply to: v1rtu0s0

They don't want to show their data for 70 years.

If you'd bothered to read the judicial review, you would know that 70 years isn't how long they want to keep things secret, it's how long it would take a team of 28 people to catalog, classify, and release 100 percent of all relevant documentation gathered at that time under the FIOA act in batches of 50,000 pages per month.

But of course you already knew that as I explained it to you on several previous occasions.

No they could have those files over as easy as hitting send . Pfizer was able to send the info over very quickly. But you already knew that .
Do you ever get sick of having to correct people on numerous occasions?