Father Plagued with Guilt after 10yr old Son Suddenly Has Heart Attach While Playing at School

a reply to: Oldcarpy2

Yes, you have no dog in the fight, you are speaking out of place.
I'll deny your bs all day long.

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: Smigg

Please explain what might be remotely "emotional" about my response?

I believe that's called "gaslighting" round these here parts.

You said this:

"Two weeks after receiving the experimental drug the young boy who is only only ten years old died of a heart attack".

Not hinting you would have us believe the "experimental drug" was to blame?

Pull the other one. It's got bells on.

I'm quoting his father as well as stating the facts, it has nothing to do with hinting towards a narrative that doesn't exist, if the jabs were safe this video wouldn't exist, not because of what happened to the child, because there is a trend with receiving the jab and then developing heart problems as well as other illnesses, it's now become common knowledge.

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: Smigg

Perhaps because the good Dr Malone is actually proven to be not credible many, many times over?

By the MSM ?

a reply to: Mandroid7

Scuse me for speaking.

What bs is that?

Instead of personal attacks on me, do you have anything on topic to say?

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: interupt42

Here:

"Two weeks after receiving the experimental drug the young boy who is only only ten years old died of a heart attack".

Here where?

1. Which part of that is incorrect?

2. Where does the OP in that says yes it was the vaccine or suggest it was definitely the jab? He was doing what you are suppose to do when you create a thread on ATS and give a description of what the video was about.

3. That was the comment made by the father who has the actual medical history of his child and the facts of what occurred that led to the incident.

The previous user who said it wasn't the vaccine without knowing any information about the child's history and or medical records is forming a bias hypothesis with nothing to back it up but his bias. The father on the other hand who clearly wasn't an anti vaxer like the other poster suggested has insider information.

So again we don't have enough information to claim it was the jab but its certainly suspect enough for the vaccinated father to suggest it might be .

The only thing I see wrong here is the people unwillingness to even consider it as a possibility per what the father is saying assuming he isn't straight out lying. Its not like it isn't already known that the jab can and has caused heart problems and on boys specifically .

a reply to: Oldcarpy2

Boy could have had a mild heart issue that didn't manifest any obvious issues, boy gets jab inflammation occurs and pushes the heart past what it could handle because of the minor issue pre-jab.
__------- random thoughts below.

People saying 100% either way are failing at logic.

We know for a fact that the inflammation isn't as rare as initially promised, your average athletic kid will never have a diagnosed heart problem, because a physical doesn't do those kinds of tests on kids.

Seems the next logical step is to stop jabbing the demographic with the smallest amount of risk until more data can be gathered.

Least that's my dain bramaged thought.

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: Mandroid7

Scuse me for speaking.

What bs is that?

Instead of personal attacks on me, do you have anything on topic to say?

We could start with the solid list of facts I stated, before your latest weak-spined word salad attempt at deflecting them.

Or is that above your emotion-based analytical skills?

originally posted by: TDawg61
Does anyone have any idea how long the"Culling"of people shall go on?Just curious 😔

Maybe the culling will stop when they stop pushing the fake vaccine mandates?

Have you ever seen these fools driving around in cars by themselves while wearing a mask? I see at least 5 a day.
They have these people tripping out so much, they wear a mask when alone.

a reply to: Mandroid7

I think you are just gaslighting. Yet again.

"Word salad"? Bollox.

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: Mandroid7

Scuse me for speaking.

What bs is that?

Instead of personal attacks on me, do you have anything on topic to say?

Your emotions are at overload, take a break fella.

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: Mandroid7

I think you are just gaslighting. Yet again.

"Word salad"? Bollox.

I think you just ignored the list of facts again and should probably stick to the Jack Reacher is sexy threads.
This is a thread for parents now.

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: tanstaafl

"ETA: watched the vid, father says he had ZERO heart issues before this, so, yeah, it was almost certainly the jab."

Bit of a stretch?

Only for those incapable of rational thought due to being caught up in this round of Mass Formation Psychosis.

a reply to: Smigg

What "emotions"? Those were questions?

a reply to: tanstaafl

Incapable of rational thought?

You are the one doing the ad hominem stuff.

Not seeing any rational thought there, but never mind.

Do try to stay on topic.

a reply to: Mandroid7

"I think you just ignored the list of facts again and should probably stick to the Jack Reacher is sexy threads.
This is a thread for parents now."

Is it really?

It seems to be a derailed thread, thanks to you.

a reply to: Oldcarpy2

Let's put the train back on the tracks and see how much tact you have then.
Quit trying to speak like your being observed in a popularity contest.

Address my provided list of facts.

Balls in your court.
Are you a conversationalist, or a troll?
This next response will let everyone know.

a reply to: Smigg

Is going to get worst, much worst, the experiment has been delivering the fatalities and it to the point that these fatalities cannot stay hidden anymore.

I cannot even think what is going to happen when babies start to die from heart attacks too.

But hey remember when dead on babies to hide vaccinations were tagged sudden infant dead syndrome, yep I am sure it will be tagged to something else as usual, and people will keep drinking the Kool-Aid because it makes them feel better.

a reply to: Mandroid7

Fine. What list of "facts"?

By the way, I'm tired of you suggesting that anyone who disagrees with you might be a "troll".

What "list of facts"?

a reply to: Oldcarpy2

Just as I suspected.
You aren't worthy of any futher responses.
Goood luck carrying that mindset through life.

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: Klassified

Why ask me?

Ask the poster who called BS?

I did, and you responded to me, so I replied.

/end