It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: angelchemuel
a reply to: EndtheMadnessNow
Sorry to be unknowledgeable, but which film is that please? I honestly don't know! I don't watch that many films, gave up years ago. The only thing I found searching was something to do with The Avengers, and it's clearly not that.
Rainbows
Jane
originally posted by: angelchemuel
a reply to: Ghostsdogood
I was asking about the YouTube video in ETMN's post Endgame with Lyrics.
Rainbows
Jane
Anywho... going off topic so... time for zeds
But the problem with that comes because of the way the US system has been set up.
You have all these people in the government, and in the hospitals, and in the pharma companies, and in the investment banks. And they are all tied together. None of them are independent.
Almost all non-for-profit hospitals in the USA are now owned by US and also Foreign investment banks. Ascension St. V are both examples of non-profit hospitals. In fact most hospitals in the US are set up this way. The non-profit part is key. It means they cannot use that “profit” to grow/reinvest it into the hospital. It is all distributed back to stakeholders(the investors of the investment banks). This means that Ascension can “grow” by buying more hospitals, but it is not really Ascension that owns the hospitals. They are purchased by the investment banks and then lumped in with Ascension.
In the large hospitals doctors have no say, it’s all up to what the hospitals board of directors decides. But those same investment banks are also allowed to then invest and make money off of own the Pharma companies. Owning stakes in the pharma companies* This is why companies go public, it allows them to raise money from outside investment sources. And in return the companies are then run by a board of directors and makes a promise to all stakeholders(any employee/owner/stock holder) that they will make decisions that will not harm the value of the company’s stock.
So you can start to see the conflict of interest here already. The hospitals and the pharma companies are both beholden to a board of directors and a promise to drive the value of the company’s stock up. Board of directors is decided by a vote of all the people who own stock in the company. And it just happens that large investment banks often hold a major percentage of the company’s stock and use those votes to decide the board of directors. The same thing happens when you let government officials take exorbitant amounts of campaign donations from companies and then hold on to those donations as untaxable earnings after an election. The officials are then owned by the investors now too.
Globalization then compounds this, because it means that countries outside the US have a great say about what goes on in the US because of how they invest their money. The biggest players (whether its pharma companies, drug manufacturers, hospitals, government officials) are all going to work together to drive profits up. Which is why it’s either vaccinate or you are # out of luck. Pharma companies can’t get people hooked on opioids anymore, so they need to get profits another way. How about vaccines every 4 months. It’s a lot easier for a company to project profits and growth when things like the vaccine are recurring like a Netflix subscription, than if it is a pay as you go buy the therapeutics only when you need them. It smooths out their demand curves over time, and makes it easier for them to forecast into the future. But at the same time, if you are killing people with the vaccine you are giving them. Then you are going to lose out on future profits as well.
and this
is just the beginning
originally posted by: angelchemuel
One of our front line UK ICU doctors politely and SCIENTIFICALLY told our health minister Sajid Javid (slimy snake) why he will not be taking the injection. Sajid Javid was clearly not expecting this reply to his question of "what do you think to the new rule about requiring vaccination?" addressing nurses. They look really uncomfortable....then in steps Doc!
Link to vid. Well worth 1 minute watch
Rainbows
Jane
originally posted by: Caled
Here.
"John F Kennedy Jr
@HSRetoucherQ
BREAKING NEWS: Anthony S Fauci Has Been Arrested For Seditious Conspiracy"
twitter.com...
Edit: Also dashen, that's a "bouncing betty." Darnit...I was wrong...Soviet anti-tank mine. I was in the neighborhood...
That thing looks familiar. Like that specific one...
originally posted by: RookQueen
a reply to: Thoughtful1
Who's twitter feed did you get this off of?
Think about it Dan it would be yuugge. You don't need to worry about the cash I got billions
originally posted by: RelSciHistItSufi
Posting this because of Trudeau's tattoo on arm... double-headed eagle? Phoenix?
ETA - If he chose to expose that arm then there must be something worse on the other arm?
Trudeau’s tattoo — which he described in 2012 as a depiction of “planet Earth inside a Haida raven” — was clearly visible as the PM got jabbed.....
originally posted by: angelchemuel
a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi
Ah, the former and very much up and coming Yugoslavia until it went to hell in a handbasket!
I'll play along.....
I would posset Melania could be a descendent of Tesla maybe and would explain Trump suddenly going for a brunette. Weren't all the other wives blonde? But also if she could be a relative of Tesla...Trump would want to 'own' that so to speak given his Great Uncle's connection.
As to No-vac..... my immediate thoughts when I read his fathers statement went to a thread made by somebody a few days, week or so back about a prediction of a Russian becoming the new Tzar.
Here we go... found the thread....The Future Russian Tzar
I took part in that thread.
Rainbows
Jane