-@TH3WH17ERABB17- -Q- Questions ---The Great Awakening--- -Part- - §39§ -

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

Oh u cheeky Mason you.

Their program didn't scan the internet and all of creation.

It played eenie meenie miney moe from an unknown short list of possibilities chosen by the programmers.

If a name wasn't on their arbitrary list it was not even an option for the system to choose from.

So yes.

Fraudulent and Homosexual

originally posted by: dashen
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

Oh u cheeky Mason you.

Their program didn't scan the internet and all of creation.

It played eenie meenie miney moe from an unknown short list of possibilities chosen by the programmers.

If a name wasn't on their arbitrary list it was not even an option for the system to choose from.

So yes.

Fraudulent and Homosexual

That's pretty offensive Dash.

I've never known anybody as dumb as this 'AI' crap, regardless of orientation.

Or age.

On the bright side auggy.

I just discovered a rather famous and important paper on neural nets, artificial intelligence, and stochastic processing about Q Learning by a professor Watkins.

The Great Architect works in mysterious ways, nón?

originally posted by: PatriotGames4u

originally posted by: dashen
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

Oh u cheeky Mason you.

Their program didn't scan the internet and all of creation.

It played eenie meenie miney moe from an unknown short list of possibilities chosen by the programmers.

If a name wasn't on their arbitrary list it was not even an option for the system to choose from.

So yes.

Fraudulent and Homosexual

That's pretty offensive Dash.

I've never known anybody as dumb as this 'AI' crap, regardless of orientation.

Or age.

It's Chan jargon. 😂

a reply to: PatriotGames4u

Tell me you don't lurk 4/8chan without telling me you don't lurk 4/8chan.

a reply to: PatriotGames4u

Exact same polling exists in enough districts nationwide for Republicans to potentially EXCEED 61 & 218 in November.

Depends on who might be counting the votes at 4 am the next day.
We have seen it happen before.
Has something changed to make me believe that November 2022 will be different?

Edit to add:
The Democrats and paid off Republicans will jam in enough votes that the totals might exceed the population... and nothing will be done about it.

originally posted by: F2d5thCavv2
a reply to: PioneerFigureSkating

This thread is a potpourri.

Simply for its collection of different perspectives, I could see how some in government might find it at least occasionally useful.

For them, it will be a point of data among many others.

But yeah, I agree with you, I think it is watched for whatever reasons. Whether The Donald regularly reads it, I don't know, but knowing such would make me grin.

Cheers

I would also imagine they scroll the boards/chans and use the entire operation as a recruitment tool. They would be missing a great opportunity at finding solid talent if they didn't.

originally posted by: dashen
a reply to: PatriotGames4u

Tell me you don't lurk 4/8chan without telling me you don't lurk 4/8chan.

I don't know who these 'chan' people are, but I certainly don't lurk them 4-8 at a time.


I'm just a little giddy about yesterday's election results.

Massive boom, and nobody has realized yet.

Democrats can't believe it actually happened, and we are getting too tired of saying 'I told you so' to even...

No, that isn't true.

It never gets old.


But yes, I've seen the unsupervised 2nd graders who just learned their first naughty words.

Funny stuff, but not my thing.

Swiped a lot of great Frog pics though.

a reply to: PioneerFigureSkating


I know, just goofin.

I have a REALLY dry sense of humor.

originally posted by: butcherguy
a reply to: PatriotGames4u

Exact same polling exists in enough districts nationwide for Republicans to potentially EXCEED 61 & 218 in November.

Depends on who might be counting the votes at 4 am the next day.
We have seen it happen before.
Has something changed to make me believe that November 2022 will be different?

Edit to add:
The Democrats and paid off Republicans will jam in enough votes that the totals might exceed the population... and nothing will be done about it.

Plan B it is then.

Either way it ends this year.

originally posted by: dashen
Their program didn't scan the internet and all of creation.

Does it need to? That's an argumentum ad absurdum.

You also said they didn't release the methodology which is incorrect.

a reply to: dashen

It also helps when the programming logic is dictated by preconceived notions.

Another exercise in stupid and unconvincing propaganda by prog dimwits.

Cheers

originally posted by: dashen
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

Their program didn't scan the internet and all of creation.

It played eenie meenie miney moe from an unknown short list of possibilities chosen by the programmers.

The Usual Suspects?
...So Keyser Söze is Q.

Fraudulent and Gay, indeed.

originally posted by: Sabrechucker
a reply to: MountainLaurel

This is a # Show by design..

LOL....yeah Sab, that sure seems to be the case ! The Q-uestion is would we be better off had we not taken the Q journey ? Can you imagine how helpless and hopeless so many must feel that have no context of what’s happening around them and no unity with other like minded people ? 😊

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: dashen
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

Their program didn't scan the internet and all of creation.

It played eenie meenie miney moe from an unknown short list of possibilities chosen by the programmers.

The Usual Suspects?
...So Keyser Söze is Q.

Fraudulent and Gay, indeed.

Someday we should coordinate a series of public announcements that 'I am Q'.

Identical public announcements from a few dozen different people that each have some kind of fake proof that we just make up 'proving' each is Q on the same day.

Find a foreign spy to blame all sorts of Frog things on joe. Nah, he's too pathetic.

Nancy.

What?

Democrats did it, goose/gander and all.

All the Qs can even fake anger at each other for a few days over 'every other Q' being a fake usurper.

Screwing with msm democrats is almost as much fun as screwing with feds.

Maybe even more fun than screwing with Canada's fascist idiot.

Ours is so old and decrepit I just feel like a vulture following a dead man walking.



After November though, we wouldn't want to screw up the spectacular spanking democrats are about to get.

You don’t want Plan B. It makes my heart hurt just thinking about Plan B.

originally posted by: PatriotGames4u

Plan B it is then.

originally posted by: Caled
You don’t want Plan B. It makes my heart hurt just thinking about Plan B.

originally posted by: PatriotGames4u

Plan B it is then.

These are democrats I'm referring to, not helpless unborn babies.

Same IQ.

Same result.

But adults.

Who in their right mind would plan B a helpless unborn baby?

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: MountainLaurel
Actually I admitted in another thread that the Father and Son Duo gave me pause, their involvement leaves a bad taste and even if it’s possibly true these men are behind Q, which I don’t believe, LOL, it would be a perfect example of “ God works in mysterious ways ! “

And the findings by both independent groups?

Kind of like the FDA, CDC, NHI, Big Pharma, MSM and Governments are independent groups ? No, they didn’t prove anything conclusively, but there’s been speculation that at some point the Watkin boys may have infiltrated and started posing as Q ? Does it really ring true that these two guys could have designed and pulled off such a brilliant operation ?

“ The World is Watching “...... Q predicted that and never in my lifetime have I seen such a World Wide movement to hold our Governments accountable for betraying us and trying to back door “ The Great Re-set “ via medical tyranny and digital passports.

Newsweek was all over this:

What Is the Q Anon Movement, and Is It Related to Kevin Spacey?

www.newsweek.com...

For those who think "Cu" is a single entity working alone, here's one for you....

One post by "Cu" that reminds us about "highlighted" info in previous drops in a simple question posed to the reader, written from a plural (we) point of view.

A single entity would perhaps have worded things differently without "point-of-view" reference to others, and I struggle to find the same anywhere else or how it could be "metaphorical" towards the reader. Could be similar in other drops but don't have time to scan right now.

#4907