It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: igloo
No. I've brought her up a few times too. What I find interesting is the psychology she's using, intentional or not I don't know. She seems to cross lines for many people, but if other factors are true such as canada being a corporation only, then there may be some merit to her ideas.
I thought some of her threats went too far but in the example given earlier of healthcare workers giving vaccines, there is a huge difference between knowing something is wrong and simply not having the information. We may think it strange to not research but most people don't bother and just assume they know their jobs, if they are not bad they cannot conceive of others doing bad in a profession that aims to heal. I believe those to be innocent as they'd be horrified if they caused harm. I suspect those higher up the chain may know what's going on. So she says shocking things but isn't very specific.
Going out on a limb here... "if" all those conspiracies about evil lizard dynasties were true, then the talk of removing them would be acceptable. "if" it is symbolic for a certain faction of humans then the ethics is fuzzy.
My biggest issue is that her followers have become quite snippy with newcomers. It became tedious so I stopped looking into it but I initially did because I'm not ok with the wholesale acceptance of CBC, CTV or Global's version or whoever has written about her.
Not here to argue about it. Accept or don't.
originally posted by: RelSciHistItSufi
a reply to: PioneerFigureSkating
PFS, I signed up for updates on TruthSocial via a browser and don't seem to have any emails on it. However, I tried going through the AppStore on my iphone - entering "truth social" in the searchbar... it came up with about 50 other apps but NOT Truth Social. It was also interesting that there were a handful of apps designed to use similar logos, or colors, or mentions of DJT. These were obviously created to confuse those searching for the app.
A handful of telegram users are saying they have set up accounts on it now; DiscloseTV, Julian's Rum, IET17.
ETA - Could mean it's not yet available in UK.
originally posted by: daskakik
originally posted by: igloo
No. I've brought her up a few times too. What I find interesting is the psychology she's using, intentional or not I don't know. She seems to cross lines for many people, but if other factors are true such as canada being a corporation only, then there may be some merit to her ideas.
Basically you are also seeing she is a fake but for some reason want to take a pause before saying that.
originally posted by: cimmerius
At the risk of being drawn into this tedious debate over who is behind Q, let me offer a quote:
“At this point, what difference does it make?” This time it applies a little differently.
The context here is pretty simple. Q, whoever that might be, did their thing. People made of it what they could. I think it’s fair to say that our attention was focused, and some lessons were learned. A lot of interesting information was dug up. Corruption in many forms was identified. A movement has resulted.
But it’s no longer all about Q. Or all about Trump. It’s about the situation in the world, identifying the problems and what can be done to make things better.
The Freedom Truckers aren’t wearing MAGA hats or waiving Q flags. Most are waving Canadian flags or US flags.
There is increased awareness of corrupt people controlling us. There is a reaction against it. You can call it a great awakening if you want to. You can identify it with Q if you want to, but the name doesn’t really matter now. What matters is if there are powerful leaders, like within the military, that support draining the swamp and bringing the criminals to justice. What matters is if something actually gets done, and not so much who gets the credit.
.
originally posted by: Grenade
Indeed, however it's still a surprise to see them offered as a sacrifice, clearly there's some division among the imperium.
originally posted by: FlyingFox
Maybe their "research" was tainted by a presumption of who Q was...
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: FlyingFox
Maybe their "research" was tainted by a presumption of who Q was...
You should take it up with both groups since two of them came to the same conclusion independently, however it would appear that their research shows you cannot alter your writing style to the point where it can't be detected.
originally posted by: PioneerFigureSkating
Again, pretty strange how they couldn't nail him down forensically.
originally posted by: PioneerFigureSkating
Analyzing speech patterns isn't nailing it down.