It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: IndieA
a reply to: Boadicea
The software has the ability to switch votes via the adjudication process. This was demonstrated to officials in Georgia.
This can be done by printing off already adjudicated ballots with switched votes.
What's been uncovered is highly complex, very involved, and closely guarded. This should be no surprise as cheaters and elections have been around forever and science and technology has only advanced over the years.
originally posted by: IndieA
a reply to: Boadicea
Things like "lost" chain-of-custody records, "lost" paper ballots, or ballot images alone don't prove fraud took place, but they obscure, hide, and add complexity to fraud.
originally posted by: IndieA
a reply to: Boadicea
Things like "lost" chain-of-custody records, "lost" paper ballots, or ballot images alone don't prove fraud took place, but they obscure, hide, and add complexity to fraud.
They make finding fraud and determining how and when it happened much more difficult, and can make proving it near impossible. What's worse, is when the potential fraudsters are in positions of power that can allow them to be obstructionist and protectionist to fraud.
Different States have different laws with regards to chain-of-custody records, paper and electronic ballot retention, voter roles, adjudication, and auditing, and I think that focusing on these areas of legislation are fundumental to election integrity in the modern era.
If tyrants assume absolute control of election outcomes, is it not fair to assume that various forms of tyranny would likely follow?
While before today I had not seen the Sept ‘22 AGO criminal report, everyone seems to be missing the report was incomplete because records under the control of election officials were not provided. It says that in the report. 👇🏼
Regardless, the Sept ‘22 criminal report appears to have a lot of places with “undetermined” outcomes due to lack of ability to review records under the control of “election officials”. Doesn’t seem very cooperative to me 👇🏼
Also, the civil investigation (completely different from the criminal investigation) was never finished because Maricopa refused to respond to public records requests 👇🏼
The EIU was bifurcated; the civil & criminal divisions conducted separate investigations. When I left in Dec ‘22, I had not been sent a response to my May ‘22 letter. (Not very cooperative) 🤷🏻♀️👇🏼
What remains very clear is that election officials refused to cooperate with the Senate, rebuffed the AGO civil division, & per the Sept report, withheld materials from the AGO criminal division.
But MC runs victory laps hoping no one notices their obfuscation & deflection. 🤦🏻♀️
JUST IN - Former FTX CEO Sam Bankman-Fried is charged with conspiracy to make unlawful political contributions and defraud the federal elections commission.
During the meeting, legislators considered a presentation by Jacqueline Breger, which, if true, exposed absolutely bombshell information regarding massive corruption and collusion between American politicians, appointed government officials, and the Sinaloa Cartels. The money laundering and racketeering scheme allegedly uses fraudulent mortgages, real estate transactions, and insurance claims in Maricopa County to hide money made through cartel human trafficking, drug trafficking, and bribery of elected officials, and to rig elections, intimidate, or murder those who threaten the operation.
The scheme allegedly creates identities, credentials, and professional licenses for “non-existent individuals,” which if true, could be used for fake voter registrations. The Maricopa County computer database is also used for the alleged “removal of genuine documents from the county system.”
“Our primary findings were first reported to Governor Ducey in 2022,” states Breger.
“These documents have definitely evidenced multiple racketeering enterprises, which include narcotic sales, money laundering, tax evasion, payroll, theft, bankruptcy fraud, life insurance fraud, auto insurance fraud, bribing of elected and appointed officials, creating and modifying public record, falsifying professional licenses and related credentials, swatting individuals who pose a threat to these enterprises, and last but not least, election fraud.”
Breger levels serious accusations against named individuals in government positions. This includes two citizens of Mesa named Dawna Rae Chavez and her daughter, Brittany Rae Chavez, who are described by Breger as “principal preparers of the documents necessary to affect the racketeering enterprise.”
A Twitter page under the name John Thaler also claimed that Brittany and Dawna Chavez are involved in this scheme in a November 7, 2022 tweet.
It appears that John Thaler and Brittany Chavez, formerly Brittany Thaler, were once married and Brittany is listed as a defendant in a lawsuit by Plaintiff John Thaler. In June 2022, John Thaler alleged that Brittany Thaler “has engaged in an array of criminal enterprises across multiple states, including money laundering and tax evasion, allegedly accomplished via real estate transactions and non-profit organizations; insurance fraud, allegedly accomplished via phony personal injury claims made on behalf of non-existent persons; skimming money from state-run aid programs; narcotics trafficking; hacking into state databases and fabricating public records; bribing public officials, including judges, police officers, judicial assistants, inspectors, assessors, and accountants; bribing private professionals, such as real estate agents and brokers; bankruptcy fraud; election fraud, allegedly accomplished by creating fake ballots and manipulating others in order to influence, among other races, the 2020 election for Maricopa County Recorder; extortion via “crypto-viruses”; the creation of fake employees on payroll systems in order to collect paychecks and benefits; and murder.” Dawna Rae Chavez is also named as a defendant.