-@TH3WH17ERABB17- -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART- - XXXV -

I'm convinced it was aimed at AF1. I researched it a while back. I forget how I figured it out, but you had to compare the missile launch to where people really were, not flight plans. If I recall, I kind of reconstructed the schedule from Twitter posts and news articles.

originally posted by: daskakik

originally posted by: pteridine
It didn't happen because of the F16 hitting the missile in the boost phase.

Or maybe, it wasn't a missile?

Or maybe, it was but it wasn't aimed at AF1 and there was no reason to shoot it down.

The F16 shooting it down is baseless. You can't prove that happened.

originally posted by: PokeyJoe
a reply to: SuicideKing33

Seriously this is such utter B.S. We're probably the premier Q discussion forum going on the internet these days, and there has been absolutely ZERO talk of this crap.

This is fear porn by the Democrats and their Media lap dogs to further demonize Conservatives and Trump supporters. Nothing more, nothing less.

Yeah Pokey they were laying it on thick this morning on Washington Journal. One of the guests this morning was from the ADL, Greenblatt, and he was heavily pushing the “ Dangerous “ Qanon myth, “ a gateway to the dark, hateful, violent conspiracy world of domestic terrorists “ Soooo, some lady called and tried to explain to him that Q is about Truth and citizen journalists and researchers, she also pointed out that Peace through knowledge, without violence, was the ultimate goal. She also pointed out that the capitol was actually Bombed in the early 90’s by underground communist group M-19 and that those terrorists were pardoned by WJC , lol, he wasn’t familiar with that bombing after claiming his group had been tracking domestic terrorists for decades...eye roll...he promptly told her that “ nice, non-violent folks “ have no idea how they are encouraging these deranged folks to become more violent.

The ADL claims to be non political, but clearly this guest was defending Nancy “ She had Nothing to do with the insurrection ! “ Here’s a little more about the ADL’s GLOBAL Mission, something, something, paved with good intentions.

www.adl.org...

Happy Birthday Pokey !

originally posted by: pteridine
You can't prove it didn't.

I'm not the one making the claim.

a reply to: Charliebrowndog

...and another aspect of the reasons behind the surgical mask being so important.

originally posted by: PioneerFigureSkating

originally posted by: PokeyJoe
a reply to: PioneerFigureSkating

Thats interesting....but dont the high quality, movie style masks go all the way down over the shoulders to protect against exactly this type of scenario?

I don't know what to tell ya. That's clearly a mask.

Or harsh lighting from below casting a distinct shadow from his collar and tie.

a reply to: Caled
Then you calculated wrong because Trump/AF1 was 3.5 hours from singapore when the "launch" supposedly happened.

originally posted by: daskakik

originally posted by: FlyingFox
Just the fact they tried so hard to convince people it was a helicopter with a lame cover story....that tells you something right there.

The fact that that pic is missing the exhaust cloud typical of a SLBM, yet people still want to believe it was a SLBM because Q said so shows Q lies hold as much sway with the Q crowd as MSM lies do with the normies.

Instead of "mental gymnastics" about what's supposedly missing from the image, why don't you explain what IS in the image?

When you talk about the presence of an "exhaust cloud", are you maybe thinking of a kerosene rocket with a rich tune to keep the temps down inside the bell? Altitude, atmospheric conditions, the presence of a tandem pre-burner/turbo pump exhaust, even the angle of view all come into play.

Have you witnessed very many missile launches, I have.

Here we have a perfect example of NO smoke plume, do you want me to post 1000 others? The missile is clearly punching through the cloud deck with 3D ambient lighting, with the typical flame exhaust. Come on, are you really hanging your hat on "smoke"? Did you drink too much coffee today?

originally posted by: FlyingFox
Instead of "mental gymnastics" about what's supposedly missing from the image, why don't you explain what IS in the image?

I'm not the one claiming to be certain what is in the pic so how can I explain it?

You are telling me that the exhaust cloud seen in every pic of a SLBM launch is not missing from that pic?

a reply to: daskakik

I'm not the one claiming to be certain what is in the pic so how can I explain it?

Why are you lying? You said it was a helicopter - definitively.

Be real dude.

a reply to: PioneerFigureSkating
I think that was plausible given the camera set-up.

a reply to: daskakik

You think it was plausible? You stated it as if it were certain fact. And then you lied about it.

a reply to: FlyingFox
I'm seeing the cloud in that pic, even though the glare from the burn washes it out a bit.

ETA: Besides the crux of the matter is that it was aimed at AF1 and even you said there was..."nfw".

originally posted by: PioneerFigureSkating
a reply to: daskakik

I'm not the one claiming to be certain what is in the pic so how can I explain it?

Why are you lying? You said it was a helicopter - definitively.

a reply to: PioneerFigureSkating
I don't care it isn't like I'm here to win you over anyway.

Hack away if it makes you feel better.

a reply to: daskakik

Yeah, I'm left wondering why you actually are here. You say it's because people were talking about the "helicopter" and yet here you are admitting you lied about that.

I think it has more to do with today's date.

a reply to: PioneerFigureSkating
Believe what you want.

I said it because it is the antithesis to what people here believe, just being a bit snide.

I am here because someone posted that AF1 was in the airspace when that pic was taken and that is wrong, yet that has become Q lore that they were taking pot shots at Trump.

Just an example of how Q lied and people just ate it up without doing any real digging.

a reply to: daskakik

What "facts?" You said that missile was a helicopter. That's the claim I took issue with.