It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The case originated in 2016, when officials in the House..
Mr. Awan’s lawyers approached the House after Democrats took control of the chamber in 2019 to discuss a possible settlement.
Ms. Lofgren said that the employees had threatened to sue various House members, offices and other employees, “seeking millions of dollars in compensatory and punitive damages.” She said the House decided to settle “due to the likelihood of an unfavorable and costly litigation outcome,”
originally posted by: RelSciHistItSufi
a reply to: imthegoat
ITG, I highly recommend a look at this @CodesUCQ tweet thread, including it's multiple nested sub-digs. It links:
Pickles = CIA
Eric Croomer = CIA
CIA linked to Dominion
Jurassic World: Dominion (new film)
Missing "E"s in various people's tweets
CIA lost control of MSM as many have flipped
...and much more
originally posted by: cimmerius
For the Country as a whole to "win" in unity, it is not enough to overcome the opposition by preponderance of force (law), they have to be neutralized as a motivational factor for the public (win hearts and minds).
originally posted by: nisei
originally posted by: doobydoll
a reply to: Observationalist
Jesus words are more important than Qs
Jesus’s track record for fulfilling prophecy is better than Qs
Have you ever heard of the 'Q-source'?
en.wikipedia.org...
The Q source (also called Q document, Q Gospel, or Q from German: Quelle, meaning "source") is a hypothetical written collection of primarily Jesus' sayings (logia). Q is part of the common material found in the Gospels of Matthew and Luke but not in the Gospel of Mark. According to this hypothesis, this material was drawn from the early Church's oral tradition.[1][2][3]
Along with Marcan priority, Q was hypothesized by 1900, and is one of the foundations of most modern gospel scholarship.[4] B. H. Streeter formulated a widely accepted view of Q: that it was written in Koine Greek; that most of its contents appear in Matthew, in Luke, or in both; and that Luke more often preserves the text's original order than Matthew. In the two-source hypothesis, the three-source hypothesis and the Q+/Papias hypothesis, Matthew and Luke both used Mark and Q as sources. Some scholars have postulated that Q is actually a plurality of sources, some written and some oral.[5] Others have attempted to determine the stages in which Q was composed.[6]
Q's existence has been questioned.[6] Omitting what should have been a highly treasured dominical document from all early Church catalogs, its lack of mention by Jerome is a conundrum of modern Biblical scholarship.[7] But copying Q might have been seen as unnecessary as it was preserved in the canonical gospels. Hence, it was preferable to copy the Gospels of Matthew and Luke, "where the sayings of Jesus from Q were rephrased to avoid misunderstandings, and to fit their own situations and their understanding of what Jesus had really meant".[8] Despite challenges, the two-source hypothesis retains wide support.[6]
The "Two-source Hypothesis" proposes that the Gospels of Matthew and Luke were written independently, each using Mark and a second hypothetical document called "Q" as a source. Q was conceived as the most likely explanation behind the common material (mostly sayings) found in the Gospel of Matthew and the Gospel of Luke but not in Mark.
(By Alecmconroy - Own work, CC BY-SA 4.0, commons.wikimedia.org...)
Q has been a mystery since the very first Gospels.
Have Faith.
I'm with you on this as well Dobydoll. I brought this up several threads back. I think there is more to Q. Its going to be biblical!
There is also this to go with Q Gospels
The Lost Sayings Gospel of Q Early Christian Writings
Love your posts btw. You blow my mind every time and further affirm spirit/God to me. God Bless!
Happy Thanksgiving to Everyone on here. For all those that celebrate. God Bless all!!!
Kraken is an ultrafast and highly accurate program for assigning taxonomic labels to metagenomic DNA sequences. Previous programs designed for this task have been relatively slow and computationally expensive, forcing researchers to use faster abundance estimation programs, which only classify small subsets of metagenomic data. Using exact alignment of k-mers, Kraken achieves classification accuracy comparable to the fastest BLAST program. In its fastest mode, Kraken classifies 100 base pair reads at a rate of over 4.1 million reads per minute, 909 times faster than Megablast and 11 times faster than the abundance estimation program MetaPhlAn. Kraken is available at John Hopkins University
As for the lack of data, something important to remember is that in the battle between dark and light, the dark is not an oppositional force to light but rather the absence of light. In order to dissipate darkness, simply shed more light. More light needs to be shed on us so that we will be able to clearly see which path to take--the path to redemption or the path to hell. The people of this planet will need full disclosure in order to unify and heal...imo
originally posted by: carewemust
Trump Rally Saturday in Georgia.
mobile.twitter.com...
Note, he used "100%" in at least 2 tweets today.