It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: pteridine
originally posted by: Dem0nc1eaner
a reply to: pteridine
Wow, that literally made my heart skip a beat until I realised you were replying to someone else....
If you weren't already aware, that is where the Enigma machine was used to break the Nazi codes.
The KL7 machine, which I am quite familiar with, is a close relative of the Enigma, a modified US device used by Germany. I read the Ultra Secret when it first came out [1974?]and recommend it to you. Alan Turing was a key player as were common people who liked puzzles, chess players, crosswords enthusiasts, etc. Brits tested people for the job and took those who had ability without regard to education, peerage, and other such fluffy stuff. Skill alone counted.
The decodes that Sufi is doing are of a different nature and cannot be easily verified.
The Germans would start their crypto day at 0001 Berlin time with an inspirational quote from a favored Nazi author to verify the machine settings for that day, which helped in the determination of the rotor settings by Bletchley. Knowing the rotor settings would give all the traffic for the day. Bletchley was key to winning the war. www.bletchleypark.org.uk...
THE COURT:I understand.I am asking you a specific question, and I am looking for a specific answer.Are you claiming that there is any fraud in connection with these 592 disputed ballots? MR.GOLDSTEIN: To my knowledge at present, no. THE COURT: Are you claiming that there is any undue or improper influence upon the elector with respect to these 592 ballots? MR.GOLDSTEIN: To my knowledge at present, no.
originally posted by: FlyingFox
a reply to: Hamlin
Nope. Maybe I didn't respond precisely to your claim that "no intent" can arise from using a toy gun on somebody, because your assertion wasn't fully formed, and makes no sense in itself.
Once you bring a "weapon", you already formed the intent to intimidate and coerce another person....be it a real weapon or a fake one. The law deals with this so very clearly, someone could use lethal force against you without legal consequences.
What was your point again?
originally posted by: tanstaafl
originally posted by: Hamlin
Why didn't Trump make this election clean if all he needs is another term?
Because it is about far more than just this one election. It is about all future elections.
The only way to truly 'drain the swamp' is to eliminate their primary tools/methods of control, and the fraudulent voting system that allows them to remain in power has to be destroyed.
The only way to do that is to allow them to cheat in a massive way, then reveal it to the world, along with massive criminal arrests and prosecutions, so that no one can deny it. That is the only way real change can take place.
originally posted by: Hamlin
So for Trump to fix the system he needed to catch the elite cheating. But he couldn't do this till he was POTUS, so everything has building to this moment.
That's a hugely risky plan, I mean apart from some of the super confident users here I've seen many a Trump/Q Supporter lose faith that Trump will win from this position.
originally posted by: Charliebrowndog
a reply to: Hamlin
I agree about the evidence needing to be big. If this all turns out to be true I think it will be so large that it will seem unbelievable.
Regardless the President has a long way to go to be back in office. There are very few allies and even fewer people he can trust.
As with most huge criminal cases I think a lot will depend on if anyone caves when the pressure gets on them.
originally posted by: tanstaafl
originally posted by: Hamlin
So for Trump to fix the system he needed to catch the elite cheating. But he couldn't do this till he was POTUS, so everything has building to this moment.
That's a hugely risky plan, I mean apart from some of the super confident users here I've seen many a Trump/Q Supporter lose faith that Trump will win from this position.
Yes, it is risky... but again, it is the only way. I for one am confident he will be able to pull it off.
originally posted by: Charliebrowndog
a reply to: Hamlin
I agree about the evidence needing to be big. If this all turns out to be true I think it will be so large that it will seem unbelievable.
Regardless the President has a long way to go to be back in office. There are very few allies and even fewer people he can trust.
As with most huge criminal cases I think a lot will depend on if anyone caves when the pressure gets on them.