-@TH3WH17ERABB17- -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART- -7W3N7Y sIx-

a reply to: crankyoldman

What are you insinuating here?

Q4225

May 12 2020 18:59:58 (EST) NEW
www.forbes.com...📁
Q

a reply to: crankyoldman

What, exactly ARE you trying to say here, Cranky?

Paul and Fauci are one and the same?

Please.

originally posted by: PokeyJoe
a reply to: crankyoldman

What are you insinuating here?

Not the same fauci.

a reply to: CanadianMason

Re Q4225

Know anything about the ring??🤔 👇

www.abovetopsecret.com...

originally posted by: RelSciHistItSufi
a reply to: EndtheMadnessNow

Cheers EMN!

Looks like I managed to post the DECODES before the the post was posted - must've Time travelled!

You are about to enter another dimension, a dimension not only of sight and sound but of mind. A journey into a wondrous land of imagination. Next stop, the Twilight Zone!

This whole mind and quantum entanglements of time and substance fit the Twilight Zone.

a reply to: crankyoldman

Same stuff Hillary drinks

It was Jeff Jensen who made the dismissal recommendation for Flynn.

a reply to: crankyoldman

Have "chrome" like in "got milk" in his system. Kind of spritely for 79 year old.

originally posted by: crankyoldman

originally posted by: PokeyJoe
a reply to: crankyoldman

What are you insinuating here?

Not the same fauci.

A Faux Fauci?

Fauxci?

a reply to: PilSungMtnMan

Re:

That’s SO 2 hours ago, lol.

Funny you should say that as the following stuck out to me on Q4224 and Q4225:

Q4224 Delta from Q4223 = 01:13:10 = Was on for MARKER 11.3 but now off (1 to 0),
Q4225 Delta from Q4224 = 01:13:01 = Was off for MARKER 11.3 but now On (0 to 1),

It stuck out because for two posts to be over an hour apart and still have Deltas that are only ten seconds difference implies deliberate. That and the 11.3 MARKER in both!

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: crankyoldman

originally posted by: PokeyJoe
a reply to: crankyoldman

What are you insinuating here?

Not the same fauci.

A Faux Fauci?

Fauxci?

The bottom two - crease either side mouth seem very different position and length.

originally posted by: liveandlearn
a reply to: LanceCorvette

I've never seen a court ask for amicus briefs without anyone first filing a request to file one. Very unusual.

I don't know what the screen shot at the link is called but someone noticed that 201 was missing. You can see 200 the 202 which is the last. So could 201 be the the original Amicus brief? And why does it not show up?

I noticed Margot Cleveland mention Adam Schiff and Democracy today.

Has it ever been done in a criminal trail before?

twitter.com...

Here TF posts Judge Sullivan's prior denial of amicus briefing.

He previously rejected 24 submittals/requests.

The motion states "The Federal Rules of Criminal Procedures do not provide for intervention by third parties in criminal cases".

Am i taking crazy pills here, how can the Judge now allow this????

a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi

I think that picture was taken by a phone camera from a view finder of a news camera.

But if we are going to talk weird photos from "Q"; what's with the three finger people holding the Hydroxychloroquine in both pictures from Forbes (article linked in "Q" 4225). Kind of reminds me of that infamous photo of Epstein with the weird female in the background.

originally posted by: Phoenix

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: crankyoldman

originally posted by: PokeyJoe
a reply to: crankyoldman

What are you insinuating here?

Not the same fauci.

A Faux Fauci?

Fauxci?

The bottom two - crease either side mouth seem very different position and length.

Camera angles can make things distorted but they do look like different people.

Grey suit Fauxi appears to have a longer face and nose bridge with a sharper chin. Would be good to see clearer images of their ears.

Ears often tell the tale.

Odd story. Made stranger to me by the fact that FISA Foundational Expert and Clinton Goon Michael Isikoff has written it.

EXCLUSIVE: In court filing, FBI accidentally reveals name of Saudi official suspected of directing support for 9/11 hijackers

The FBI inadvertently revealed one of the U.S. government’s most sensitive secrets about the Sept. 11 terror attacks: the identity of a mysterious Saudi Embassy official in Washington who agents suspected had directed crucial support to two of the al-Qaida hijackers.

originally posted by: EndtheMadnessNow
a reply to: xuenchen

LOL!

"When you need a CRIMINAL. LAWYER."

a reply to: BrennanHuff22

Just saw that with his scribed link and the link now says This document has been removed from scribed. This is litteraly within minutes of TF's post.

But I took a screenshot of TF's copy



Something neferious is going on. Thank god TF did the screen shot.

a reply to: liveandlearn

Maybe someone mentioned Arkancide.

a reply to: EndtheMadnessNow

EMN, your reminder on the RING brought back to mind something I meant to post months ago!

There was a war of egos between Auction Houses, like Christies and Sotheby's, and Antique Dealers in the 70s and 80s which went something like this:

Auction houses: We have all the educational knowledge and Antique dealers are just scam artists,

Antique Dealers: We have all the practical knowledge and can identify the fakes better, you tax the buyers and the sellers and effectively take a quarter of the sale value for no risk.


To an extent both were right because of The Rings.

How did a RING work:
1) A group of Antique Dealers are going to an auction, for which they have pre-read whats to be sold,
2) They stop at a pub on the way and, over a pint, decide they will not bid against each other, in order to keep the purchase price down,
3) It is agreed that only dealer A will bid for lot 1, dealer C for lot 2, etc.
4) When the lots have been bought, if dealer B still wants lot 1 he can buy it off dealer A, giving him a nice profit but still paying less than it would have been including auction house premium if they'd bid against each other.


I wonder if there is a similar RING of politicians and foundations milking federal budgets? If so, it's a prime target for RICO.