It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: MonkeyBalls2
(These are the numbers from the usual time, about 2-3 hrs ago, I got caught up in a documentary, or two, on youtube...)
He's not taking a break from working according to the source you posted, he's teleworking.
originally posted by: carewemust
U.S. CDC Director to Self-Quarantine.
www.cnn.com...
Why is anyone still Self-Quarantining, when almost instant Covid-19 test results are available? To take a break from work? That's what the Chicago Cook-County board commissioner did 2 weeks ago.
Conventional diagnostic tests for the novel coronavirus may give false-negative results about 30% of the time, meaning people with an active COVID-19 infection still test negative for the disease, according to news reports.
"The good news is that the tests appear to be highly specific: If your test comes back positive, it is almost certain you have the infection," Krumholz wrote. But RT-PCR tests might give false-negative results for a number of reasons, he added.
Krumholz said that while diagnostic tests in general aren't always perfect, he and others are discovering that false negatives in COVID-19 tests seem uncomfortably common.
“A study out of China looked at a bunch of people who felt sick in ways that were very consistent with COVID-19 — not only were they from Wuhan where the pandemic hot spot began, but their X-ray findings were very consistent with the disease,” Krumholz said. “It was almost certain that these people had it. They met all the criteria, and yet the tests were negative in about 30 percent of the cases.”
Some doctors have expressed concern that the false-negative rate in the U.S. could be even higher than 30 percent.
originally posted by: Oleman
CDC Mortality Statistic
Here, you can download the weekly US death count for any reason, from 2014 to last week.
Looks to me like 46,056 peole in US died this year above the "expected number." A lot less than IMHE touts.
The last two weeks, deaths seem to be 13% less than "expected."
Yeah... thing is, I didn't want flu/etc deaths (which is what that's showing).
originally posted by: Oleman
a reply to: Byrd
Yeah... thing is, I didn't want flu/etc deaths (which is what that's showing).
I double checked. CDC says "there were 2,813,503 registered deaths in the United States in 2017."
Divided by 365, that works out to 7772.1/day.
Using the data for 2020 week 1 from the "Deaths, Total" column = 52,476 when divided by 7, is 7,496/day.
Llooks to me like the "Deaths, Total" column is the deaths total due to any cause for any age group, for that week.
Do you have preconception biases that blind you from reality, or are you are pushing a false agenda?
originally posted by: carewemust
U.S. CDC Director to Self-Quarantine.
www.cnn.com...
Why is anyone still Self-Quarantining, when almost instant Covid-19 test results are available? To take a break from work? That's what the Chicago Cook-County board commissioner did 2 weeks ago.
Final UK death toll from coronavirus could be worse than the Second World War with almost 700,000 dying over five years
Researchers predict that without a vaccine Britain could be forced to keep social distancing measures until 2024 in order to beat Covid-19. But if Britain is plunged into a recession as a result, more than 675,000 could die from the virus, poor healthcare and impoverishment over the next five years, experts warn. The figure, which comes from a new study led by Philip Thomas, a Professor of Risk Management at the University of Bristol, is higher than the approximately 525,000 civilian and military personnel from Britain who died in the Second World War.
Boris Johnson unveils new 'stay alert' slogan and colour-coded warning system ahead of crucial 7pm address revealing road map out of lockdown - but scientists warn that 100,000 could die by 2021 if coronavirus restrictions are lifted too early