It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: alphabetaone
Well, you have to admit, liberty and freedom are pretty valueless if one isn't alive to appreciate either.
originally posted by: McGinty
a reply to: Byrd
Well, it was just ‘what if’, so the more I hear that there’s no way in hell that could happen, or at least unlikely in the uber-extreme, then the better I’ll sleep tonight zzzz
originally posted by: tanstaafl
originally posted by: alphabetaone
Well, you have to admit, liberty and freedom are pretty valueless if one isn't alive to appreciate either.
Yes...
And life is pretty much worthless without them.
Catch-22? No, it just seems that way to some people who have an irrational fear of some virus that is only a threat to those who have weak immune systems, usually by virtue of their own poor life choices.
originally posted by: McGinty
a reply to: Byrd
Well, it was just ‘what if’, so the more I hear that there’s no way in hell that could happen, or at least unlikely in the uber-extreme, then the better I’ll sleep tonight zzzz
the CV pandemic is not Gods' or Angelic work.... weaponized virus is a product of sinister minded humans who are likely influenced by the Anti-God Spirits locked in the Earth's Abyss (nether realm)
about 6-8 April I began catching glimpses of a 'dark creature' in our residence
bunny sized or year old cat size, a Black Fog of a being that is always at the edge of your visual field & 'poof' disappears when your eyes focus on that black & vaporous form
always close to a corner of a room, or under a chair or table...totally elusive, no eyes or ears/mouth, just a head & torso with 4 legs...
I refuse to confront IT, ...
I think that perhaps the 'Black lifeform' is part of the whole Spirit-of-the-Age frequency/resonance we are all wrapped up in at the moment......continues.....
“Some governments have suggested that the detection of antibodies to the SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, could serve as the basis for an ‘immunity passport’ or ‘risk-free certificate’ that would enable individuals to travel or to return to work assuming that they are protected against re-infection,” the WHO said.
“There is currently no evidence that people who have recovered from COVID-19 and have antibodies are protected from a second infection,” it said.
originally posted by: MonkeyBalls2
Financial Times Graphs by John Burn-Murdoch, more at the link :
originally posted by: 727Sky
So much for the herd immunity if WHO is to be believed. "No evidence" that recovered COVID-19 patients cannot be reinfected: WHO
www.reuters.com...
“Some governments have suggested that the detection of antibodies to the SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, could serve as the basis for an ‘immunity passport’ or ‘risk-free certificate’ that would enable individuals to travel or to return to work assuming that they are protected against re-infection,” the WHO said.
“There is currently no evidence that people who have recovered from COVID-19 and have antibodies are protected from a second infection,” it said.
Are you looking at the graph or raw data? The graph is a rolling average and it looks pretty flat for the last 5 days of rolling average, but the raw data could show an uptick that hasn't turned up the rolling average yet. In fact FT has a new article titled "Coronavirus latest: US death toll accelerates as Trump calls halt to media briefings" but it's behind a paywall so I can't read it. If someone here subscribes to Financial times or has another source maybe they can enlighten us.
originally posted by: Byrd
originally posted by: MonkeyBalls2
Financial Times Graphs by John Burn-Murdoch, more at the link :
Is it just my eyes, or are the US numbers starting to trend slightly upward?
originally posted by: alphabetaone
US
Not to mention, if the US is experiencing economic hardship, then everyone is.... including Sweden.
What are you using for a definition of "day-over-day"? It doesn't look like day over day data.
originally posted by: alphabetaone
a reply to: Arbitrageur
Those are actually day-over-day deaths in the US
originally posted by: Byrd
originally posted by: Observationalist
originally posted by: Byrd
In order to kill viruses/microorganisms in the air, you need a minimum of 15 minutes to an hour exposure at low doses.
Someone tried it while standing in the room
The sunburn lasted for quite awhile.
If you bring people into a sterile room, it becomes non-sterile. You have to sterilize the humans and their clothing (as in an operating room.)
Here is another study to consider. It’s by Colombia University on a safe use of UV light to prevent the spread of viruses
Using the Power of Light: Preventing the Airborne Spread of Coronavirus and Influenza Virus
(sigh) Yes. Did you read the paper?
Allow me to quote from the paper-- bolding is mine...
We’ve shown that this light can kill influenza viruses, and now aim to determine if it can also kill coronaviruses. Take a look at the video below to see how it works.
Working in a safe environment with no possibility of anyone being exposed to coronavirus, we will “aerosolize” the viruses—meaning that we turn them into a fine spray—and we will flow this spray through a chamber in front of our far-UVC lamps. We will then test to find out how many of the viruses were killed by the light. If we can confirm that far-UVC light does efficiently kill coronaviruses, lights could be deployed anywhere people congregate, including schools, airports, train stations, airplanes, and hospitals, to limit the spread of the virus that causes COVID-19 as well as other coronaviruses that cause other respiratory diseases.
So they don't actually know it does and this is a theory they want to test.
In short, exposure to far-UVC light is safe for people, but potentially lethal for viruses in the air.
As you said, "potentially." Not confirmed.
Preventing the spread is key now. Especially with Fall and Flu season approaching.
Oh heck yes. And preventing flu from spreading as well. Low cost solutions would be wonderful - IF proven.
But it hasn't been proven. It's one of those wonderful ideas that is so far off the scale that no agency will fund it. They've taken the wonderful step of crowdfunding it (I heartily approve) and in theory it might work. I think it would be an excellent solution for places like grocery stores an so forth.
But right now it is only a hot idea and hasn't actually been tested.