It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Tempussolo
So, I've been thinking about what tanstaafl has been saying and it makes sense however there are more than one group of high risk people here in the US I think many forget. We are running about 42% obesity rate in the US and many with obesity suffer other health conditions that are associated with it such as type 2 diabetes. These 42% of Americans aren't just older. They comprise all age groups. If we are going to focus our isolation/lock-down of older high risk individuals, should we not also do the same or the brunt of those 42%? How would you do that? If you are over 65 you're locked down. If you are over 28% (or pick a number) body fat, boom - locked down. Marginally obese but still have type 2, locked-down. Higher susceptibility to respiratory issues (smokers, cola miners, maybe vapers) - locked em down.
What about high blood pressure. 1 our 3 American have high blood pressure, many of them don't even know. How do you separate that group out as well (although the obesity contributes to many of these but certainly not all)? These individuals are also in a high risk group.
So while I agree on tanstaafl's proposals to isolate older at risk people - especially in long term care facilities, I do not see how we can't aggressively address the other higher percentage of the population that are also high risk. If you think a 38 year old obese male with type 2 diabetes and high blood pressure isn't likely to land up in ICU as fast as a 80 year resident in a senior living center you're wrong and that is were we run the risk of over stressing the system.
I live in Texas, a state known for its share of 'bubbas' and believe me, some of these guys cant get up a flight of stairs without huffing and puffing and breaking into a sweat. These are high risk individuals that need to be isolated as well because there are a lot of them and if they start to go down, the system goes down.
tanstaafl what is your suggestion for these scenarios?
The Dow Jones Industrial Average was down nearly 10% at the open, falling by 2,250 points to 20,935
The Nasdaq was off by 6.12%, falling 7,392.73
The S&P 500 fell by 8.14%, or 220.55, to open at 2,490.47
originally posted by: UFO1414
Stock markets halted for unprecedented third time due to coronavirus scare
The Dow Jones Industrial Average was down nearly 10% at the open, falling by 2,250 points to 20,935
The Nasdaq was off by 6.12%, falling 7,392.73
The S&P 500 fell by 8.14%, or 220.55, to open at 2,490.47
techcrunch.com...
originally posted by: mzinga
a reply to: tanstaafl
1. Flatten the curve is the correct approach, but it is driving much fear and hoarding
2. We still really don't know an awful lot exactly how this is going to get played out
3. People continuing to send mixed messages. Which again drives fear. It is much better for people to get told the truth because RESOLVE then takes the place of fear. The unknown is much scarier than the known.
Spaniards attempting to get to work on Monday were left fuming after a cut in commuter and metro services in Spain’s two largest cities meant transport was more crowded than a typical morning. All this despite the government urging people to keep their distance from others.
overcrowded platforms and train carriages forcing commuters into close proximity to one another made a mockery of the national lockdown.
originally posted by: puzzlesphere
a reply to: MrRCflying
I do care what others think.
These are my people! I care about them and we depend on each other. It's what makes the world work.
We're in this together, and I have just physically removed myself from them... that's scary... and any anger in them to my actions are also coming from a place of fear... which I can empathise with.
I hate that this virus attacks us in the worst place... our trust for each other, which erodes our compassion for each other.
Now more than ever, we have to make a special effort to communicate, to keep the closeness that the virus physically removes from us.
So yes... I will continue to care, and beat myself up because my actions do have an effect (either way) and I will explain my actions in detail to anyone that will listen... hopefully generating some wisdom in those that engage... and raising questions in those that don't.
If my government won't act fast enough, then I will cause a grass-roots tide that will force them to act... but I will only do that by sharing my experiences honestly... and taking on board an working through that type of anger that comes from lack of knowledge, uncertainty and the unknown.