Atlantis has been discovered?!

a reply to: anti72

When you can't attack the message............ Your opinion?

twitter.com...

For your viewing pleasure

Thank you for your reply.

originally posted by: Mike27
a reply to: All Seeing Eye

I believe the circles are tailings from a rotary drill, either prospecting, or environmental assessment.

I'm skeptical of this scenario... if you look at the pattern of the columns, it's regular and a design. You don't drill in patterns like that (check out the aerial views of any West Texas oilfield.

I think there's another answer -- however, knowing nothing about the town or its people or needs I would simply say "modern structure" until I can see ground level photos (and even then, I might not have a clue, y'know?)

originally posted by: All Seeing Eye
a reply to: Byrd

Since it's on the edge of town, it could be anything.

Sooo, archeology sites can only be found in town's or 'outside towns? Are you implying archaeological sites must follow strict guidelines as to where they can, and can not be found? Now you have me confused lol

Ajkoujk has probably been inhabited on and off for thousands of years. We must only look at the present occupants as the only ones ever there? You make me want to go warm up a pizza lol lol

I believe you misinterpreted what I was saying... my contention was that it's a new construction and since it's on the outskirts of town it could likely be anything. You were saying it was a dig site with test holes.

I have no doubt that there's older buildings around; I can see the ruins of several of them in towns and I'm well aware of how towns build up and spread.

However, in addressing your original point, the site is not and was not an archaeological dig and it's large, which actually implies space being used by a company (people in the area generally do not own large plots of land). Other visual clues suggest that it's probably not a house-compound for a very wealthy person,

209 Miles from the Center of the Eye is what appears to be another Guard Post/ Fort.

There appears to be one set of vehicle tracks that enter the area. There are indications of other structures below and to the right of the main structure, more than one. No large digging is visible.

19°45'55.61"N 14°15'54.47"W

originally posted by: All Seeing Eye
209 Miles from the Center of the Eye is what appears to be another Guard Post/ Fort.

There appears to be one set of vehicle tracks that enter the area. There are indications of other structures below and to the right of the main structure, more than one. No large digging is visible.

19°45'55.61"N 14°15'54.47"W

Nobody does any digs on recent (younger than 200 years) structures unless they're doing a forensic dig or it's historically significant. Whatever this is, it's next to a wadi that gets seasonal water flows. I believe there is a single well in the picture next to the wadi.

In an inhospitable area like that, no one will waste resources and crews on things that are clearly Not Very Old.

Another site of interest in Ajoujk is this rectangular 46X255ft structure that first appears in June of 2020. By June 23 is completely exposed, or completed. Piles of dirt can be seen piled up outside the fence area that might suggest it was removed to expose this structure. Other possibilities exist as well.

Its anyone's guess what it might be. Could be the foundation for a water treatment plant.

June 2020

June 2021

Present.

a reply to: Byrd

Yes. In Arizona we call them "Washes" or Wash. Wadi=Wash.

Also, this site is very similar to the site at 22° 6'15.58"N 12° 5'6.90"W Which Ill be covering soon, if ATS doesn't ban me for using too much band width

a reply to: Byrd

Nobody does any digs on recent (younger than 200 years) structures unless they're doing a forensic dig or it's historically significant.

Not necessarily true. Looters, trophy hunters, grave robbers will pick over sites, dig some here or there. I have one site this is apparent at.

And how on earth do you tell something is "Historically Significant" unless, you dig....

In the mean time..

The man that gave us the translation of Plato's CRITIAS was Benjamin Jowett. Very intelligent as shown by his life works.
His interpretation of Plato's Critaias was that it was a work of fiction with no allowance that it may have been an honest retelling of a ancient story. Since he wrote his translation and his PERSONAL ANALYSIS other sources have come to light that support Plato's work as being based in some type of fact.

I can not comment on the Character of the author, but those he taught, did.

A well-known Balliol rhyme about him runs:

Here come I, my name is Jowett.
All there is to know I know it.
I am Master of this College,
What I don't know isn't knowledge!

en.wikipedia.org...

You can take his opinion or not, it is the readers choice.

CRITIAS
by Plato



Translated by Benjamin Jowett

www.ancienttexts.org...

ADDED: For other sources of material for support.

Scholars the world over have repeatedly declared that ancient sources describing Atlantis are plentiful, “but before Plato–nothing”. They make such a declaration because of several reasons:

they disregard every record in which Atlantis is not mentioned by name;
they tend to disregard records which utilize a variant spelling of Atlantis;
they imply (whether consciously or unconsciously) that we possess all the ancient manuscripts ever written between the time of Solon and Plato;
they seem to be unfamiliar with the Sanskrit writings of India–apparently forgetting that those Sanskrit speakers originated in Central Europe.

For a timeline of ancient writers before and after Plato

fathersergio.wordpress.com...

The age of man goes back a very long time. Way, past Atlantis. Mr Cremo seems to have had the displeasure of having to deal with the Royal Gate Keeping Box Makers

originally posted by: All Seeing Eye
The age of man goes back a very long time. Way, past Atlantis. Mr Cremo seems to have had the displeasure of having to deal with the Royal Gate Keeping Box Makers

Cremo is literally a Hindu fundamentalist.
Do you also believe Pat Robertson's version of Human history?

Harte

a reply to: Harte

Cremo is literally a Hindu fundamentalist.

And how would that impact the subject material? I have been open to considering all information available on the subject of human (Beings) origins.

As far as the other individual, its only a matter of time that the, A, box maker is exposed for their corrupt practice of selling snake oil, for lack of a better term. To give credit where credit is due, though, they are some of the most brilliant con men on earth (As far as I know lol). They use magic in turning a truth, warping, twisting, and rebranding it, then turn it for a profit.

Enough on that, for now.

I have noticed a phenomenon in the deserts around Mauritania, especially around the "Eye", where vegetation will only grow in very specific places. This is outside what might be considered in the area of an oasis or a natural spring. Surface water is available in very few places, but even then, no vegetation grows.

It seems this vegetation is very selective of the "Nitch" it chooses to live in. So I looked for new areas where this vegetation grows, and wouldn't you know it, more ruins.

I'm pretty sure I'm not the only one to discover this association..

Personally, I liked the way Cremo explained how the paradigm filter worked. Sometimes new info is sifted out honestly, I can appreciate that. But when a person just refuses to look at it, its a agenda...

New discoveries I will be sharing, among them are odd Circular forms. New area for "Building Blocks".

a reply to: All Seeing Eye

You are not the first to realize this where ever you see date palms in the desert people put them there. Date palm trees, introduced by Arabs, is requisite for the existence of humans in the oasis; dates are very energetic food, trunks are used to make beams, leaves are used to make baskets, ropes, mats and covers for huts,… its preserves fruit trees against the sun.

Most of the trees are acacia many are over 2000 years old and survive because their roots can go down up to 30 feet tapping into underground water supplies. There is water below the sand and anywhere you can reach this water by digging wells you will find evidence of human existence. The area around the eye has a lot of underground water supplies because of the mountain ranges.

A good indication if there is underground water is on the surface they are usually a wash. So when it receives rain a river will start

originally posted by: All Seeing Eye
a reply to: Harte

Cremo is literally a Hindu fundamentalist.

And how would that impact the subject material?

Gee. I don't know.
Why don't you ask Pat Robertson?

Maybe you should look up the publisher of his book "Forbidden Archaeology."

Not sure it would matter to you though.

Harte

a reply to: dragonridr

You are not the first to realize this where ever you see date palms in the desert people put them there.

Where did I use the word "Tree's"?

The vegetation I am discussing is a relatively small bush, shrub, that is distributed in select areas. It does not grow in sand dunes or the open desert. But, there is a predictable pattern where they can be found. If you know the variety, please share.

Also, using this predictability I was able to discover more "Building Blocks" in two separate areas..

The logic follows.

In the desert, sand, stone, clay's, will not hold sufficient amount of water that is required for many plants to survive. Some plants however are extremity drought resistant. All they need is, what is available, and exploit that source.

Many "biological's" are perfect Sponges for moisture. Trees, branches, wood, lumber, doors, roof beams, bones with their sponge like interior. Fabrics to some extent would also give moisture a place to shelter, depending on the amount.

If these types of materials are introduced into a area and then the environment turns to a vary dry area, depending on depth, a vegetation would have a tendency to take advantage of that stored moisture source. The closer to the surface, the more vegetation will take advantage of this "Nitch".

I seriously doubt anyone went around and buried "Biologicals". It could happen naturally by, flood. The larger the brush area, the larger the flood. In this scenario the larger, heavier items would fall out of the flow sooner than the lighter items. Those items would trail away from the head of the flood, leaving a trail. A trail that can be followed.

originally posted by: Harte

originally posted by: All Seeing Eye
a reply to: Harte

Cremo is literally a Hindu fundamentalist.

And how would that impact the subject material?

Gee. I don't know.
Why don't you ask Pat Robertson?

Maybe you should look up the publisher of his book "Forbidden Archaeology."

Not sure it would matter to you though.

Harte

First, Its the subject matter in the video I present, where you can judge the speakers demeanor, presentation. He explains his evidence and conclusions in a mature and rational manner. I find him to be quite credible.

Second. You attempt to re-frame the information in another context it was not presented to be in. Never said one word about a book. And since you bring it up, he probably had to use the publisher he did because of "Institutional" pressures from other highly controlled publishers. Your right, I don't care what publisher he used. Its the information that is important.

Your reasoning for doing this, I can only imagine.....

originally posted by: All Seeing Eye
a reply to: Harte

I have noticed a phenomenon in the deserts around Mauritania, especially around the "Eye", where vegetation will only grow in very specific places. This is outside what might be considered in the area of an oasis or a natural spring. Surface water is available in very few places, but even then, no vegetation grows.

It seems this vegetation is very selective of the "Nitch" it chooses to live in. So I looked for new areas where this vegetation grows, and wouldn't you know it, more ruins.

As others have said, when humans move in, they change the nature of the land. They farm (which changes the richness of the soil), they dig water sources, they divert water, etc. This is twofold since humans live where they can readily get water (either through wells or landscape modification.

Also, deserts are seldom completely barren dunes. Vegetation of any sort tells humans where there's some available water (even seasonal) to sustain life. So plants, animals, and humans go together in dry desert areas.

originally posted by: All Seeing Eye

First, Its the subject matter in the video I present, where you can judge the speakers demeanor, presentation. He explains his evidence and conclusions in a mature and rational manner. I find him to be quite credible.

There's a difference between sounding credible and being credible. I'm sure you have many examples.

And since you bring it up, he probably had to use the publisher he did because of "Institutional" pressures from other highly controlled publishers.

It's because his ideas are fundamentalist religious in nature and not scholarly. You can find similar examples with different twists in the Young Earth (Creationist) community, among Muslim fundamentalist teachers, etc. As with any religious text, the evidence from the planet contradicts human thought.

Great Ages and Cycles are tidy explanations of "why conditions in the world are so awful" but in order to accept this you have to take a very narrow and biased view of history (and reject written histories from other nations) and ignore some broader truths.

originally posted by: Byrd

originally posted by: All Seeing Eye

First, Its the subject matter in the video I present, where you can judge the speakers demeanor, presentation. He explains his evidence and conclusions in a mature and rational manner. I find him to be quite credible.

There's a difference between sounding credible and being credible. I'm sure you have many examples.

And since you bring it up, he probably had to use the publisher he did because of "Institutional" pressures from other highly controlled publishers.

It's because his ideas are fundamentalist religious in nature and not scholarly. You can find similar examples with different twists in the Young Earth (Creationist) community, among Muslim fundamentalist teachers, etc. As with any religious text, the evidence from the planet contradicts human thought.

Great Ages and Cycles are tidy explanations of "why conditions in the world are so awful" but in order to accept this you have to take a very narrow and biased view of history (and reject written histories from other nations) and ignore some broader truths.

Because a example may be found in a religious context does it now belong exclusively to that paradigm?

the evidence from the planet contradicts human thought

How so vary true this is!

Great Ages and Cycles are tidy explanations of "why conditions in the world are so awful" but in order to accept this you have to take a very narrow and biased view of history (and reject written histories from other nations) and ignore some broader truths.

Again, hitting the proverbial nail on the head. But lets be distastefully honest here. You want to blame the bright and intelligent for the actions of this elitist ancient order who control the minds of the gifted? You want to blame all of mankind because a secretive ancient pact was made to not enlighten mankind, but to control,covertly?

They do not reject it out of knowledge, but of an institutionalized ignorance. They are not allowed to consider anything outside the paradigm (Box). How can you research a subject when it has been deleted out of history, and then pressured to accept it as a fiction.

Great cycles occur because the intelligent slave becomes, too knowledgeable, and the knowledge must be set back, destroyed. You can't have your heard of sheep getting to the point where they can revolt successfully. (Become like gods)

Nor are they allowed to "know" the true nature, attributes, of these "gods" (Dagon, dog, dragon). For if they did they would realize the true nature of "The Matrix of Lies" we truly live in.

And this is why "Atlantis" must be put back into it's original Context. These "gods" have been terraforming earth for millions of years, but you cant go there until the memory of Atlantis has been put right.

The name of my book will be "Ghetto Of the Gods, the true story of Atlantis". If, I ever write it...

originally posted by: All Seeing Eye

originally posted by: Harte

originally posted by: All Seeing Eye
a reply to: Harte

Cremo is literally a Hindu fundamentalist.

And how would that impact the subject material?

Gee. I don't know.
Why don't you ask Pat Robertson?

Maybe you should look up the publisher of his book "Forbidden Archaeology."

Not sure it would matter to you though.

Harte

First, Its the subject matter in the video I present, where you can judge the speakers demeanor, presentation. He explains his evidence and conclusions in a mature and rational manner. I find him to be quite credible.

Second. You attempt to re-frame the information in another context it was not presented to be in. Never said one word about a book. And since you bring it up, he probably had to use the publisher he did because of "Institutional" pressures from other highly controlled publishers. Your right, I don't care what publisher he used. Its the information that is important.

Your reasoning for doing this, I can only imagine.....

Now you assume I don't know Cremo's (hundred year old) "evidence."

I'm not re-framing anything. I'm telling you where Cremo is coming from. He's Hindu, A Hindu Creationist, and a former Hare Krishna airport beggar. In fact, the Hare Krishnas actually published "Forbidden Archaeology."
My analogy is spot on. Near perfect in fact.

Harte