It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
But let's "cut the bull#" and get real. The context in which Charlie Hebdo was active was not full freedom of speech- they refrained from anti-semitism and from any mockery of the holocaust.
I do not personally feel it is considerate to mock the most sensitive issues other people have, but just being objective here (or as much as possible) let's not pretend that we are holy protectors of free speech for all- we pick and choose what people are free to express.
That is bound to make some people feel oppressed, some feel that favoritism is going on, and that the holy warriors of rightious indignation are being hypocrites.
I DO NOT support or condone killing people for that, I do not think it is an excuse, I just wish to point in the direction of honest realistic perception of what is going on.
They, too, are getting tired of the endless war and the rhetorical and propagandistic rule.
George Bush has claimed he was on a mission from God when he launched the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq, according to a senior Palestinian politician in an interview to be broadcast by the BBC later this month.
Mr Bush revealed the extent of his religious fervour when he met a Palestinian delegation during the Israeli-Palestinian summit at the Egpytian resort of Sharm el-Sheikh, four months after the US-led invasion of Iraq in 2003.
One of the delegates, Nabil Shaath, who was Palestinian foreign minister at the time, said: "President Bush said to all of us: 'I am driven with a mission from God'. God would tell me, 'George go and fight these terrorists in Afghanistan'. And I did. And then God would tell me 'George, go and end the tyranny in Iraq'. And I did."
Mr Bush went on: "And now, again, I feel God's words coming to me, 'Go get the Palestinians their state and get the Israelis their security, and get peace in the Middle East'. And, by God, I'm gonna do it."
To compared modern Christianity to 'modern' Islam is a false equivalency IMO.
originally posted by: Hefficide
a reply to: Jonjonj
So your plan to defeat intolerant extremism is to engage in intolerant extremism against the other intolrant extremism?
Without being offensive at all, you might want to sit down and spend some quality "me" time with that idea.
originally posted by: nonspecific
a reply to: Jonjonj
I understand to a degree where you are coming from but your ownership of the world you live in seems a little odd.
Your constant refferal to YOUR, ME MINE could come across a little arrogant if read in the wrong way.
Is the world we live in yours? Mine? ours or everybodys?
Do not get me wrong I understand your sentiment but you must admit it seems a trifle arrogant to claim the world as your own.
originally posted by: nonspecific
a reply to: Jonjonj
I did not to intend that you should do otherwise.
Simply that if you considered the world a shared place as opposed to one of your own ownership it may be easier to live in.
I do NOT accept the right of a religion to exist in MY world, that world in which I live, that wishes to endanger my freedom and the freedom of those that I love.
I do NOT accept the argument that I have got it all wrong, that I am being lied to, that this is all a lie and it's all down to political and economic issues because, while it MAY indeed be the case, I am in no position to do anything beyond protecting me and mine. And I can NOT do that when random, destructive events take place in places that are so much like MY home that they could just as easily BE my home.
There is a clear danger, from radical followers of Islam, to me, my family, my life and my world!