It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Perhaps you need to learn how to speak intelligible before you go for science.
Show all of us persistence.
Three contrail systems were analyzed with geostationary satellite data to document the conversion of the
contrails to cirrus clouds. Two unique contrails, a pair of figure eights and a NASA DC-8 oval, were tracked for more than 7
hours. A cluster of contrails from commercial aircraft lasted over 17 hours.
MagnumOpus
Technically, every jet leaves a trail of chemicals and a short lived fog, which dissipates and doesn't leave an 8 hour fog.
Three contrail systems were analyzed with
geostationary satellite data to document the conversion of the
contrails to cirrus clouds. Two unique contrails, a pair of figure
eights and a NASA DC-8 oval, were tracked for more than 7
hours. A cluster of contrails from commercial aircraft lasted over
17 hours.
Aloysius the Gaul
MagnumOpus
Technically, every jet leaves a trail of chemicals and a short lived fog, which dissipates and doesn't leave an 8 hour fog.
Wrong
Three contrail systems were analyzed with
geostationary satellite data to document the conversion of the
contrails to cirrus clouds. Two unique contrails, a pair of figure
eights and a NASA DC-8 oval, were tracked for more than 7
hours. A cluster of contrails from commercial aircraft lasted over
17 hours.
Contrails, as anthropogenic cirrus clouds, affect both the
radiation and hydrological cycle in a manner similar to other
cirrus clouds except that they may have different microphysical
properties [e.g., Gayet et al., 1996]. I
When jet plumes run for that long---they are chemically helped.
The microphysical property might be Boron seeded clouds.
MagnumOpus
Yes, you are wrong. Because, the thread demonstrated that Commercial aircraft used chemtrail methods.
Just because NASA didn't include that chemtrails methods exist for Commercial aircraft fuels, just means they missed that point.
They needed to say if the planes used Boron loaded fuels or not.
They did note:
Contrails, as anthropogenic cirrus clouds, affect both the
radiation and hydrological cycle in a manner similar to other
cirrus clouds except that they may have different microphysical
properties [e.g., Gayet et al., 1996]. I
The microphysical property might be Boron seeded clouds.
In situ observations of the microphysical properties of upper-tropospheric contrails and cirrus clouds have been performed during more than 15 airborne missions over central Europe. Experimental and technical aspects concerning in situ characterization of ice clouds with the help of optical and nonoptical detection methods (preferably FSSP-300 and Hallet-type replicator) are addressed. The development of contrails into cirrus clouds on the timescale of 1 h is discussed in terms of a representative set of number densities, and size distributions and surface area distributions of aerosols and cloud elements, with special emphasis on small ice crystals (diameter 100 cm−3) of nearly spherical ice crystals with mean diameters in the range 1–10 μm. Young cirrus clouds, which mostly contain small regularly shaped ice crystals in the range 10–20-μm diameter and typical concentrations 2–5 cm−3, have been observed. Measurement results are compared to simple parcel model calculations to identify parameters relevant for the contrail–cirrus transition. Observations and model estimates suggest that contrail growth is only weakly, if at all, affected by preexisting cirrus clouds.
When jet plumes run for that long---they are chemically helped.
The technique even made it more than possible, as it added the Boron to soak up fluorine and chlorine from the tropopause area of the skies and curb the ozone depletion effect.
MagnumOpus
One Atom of Boron combined with Nitrogen can seed the accumulation of thousands of water molecules to make scattering material.
B2O3 + 2 NH3 → 2 BN + 3 H2O (T = 900 °C)
B(OH)3 + NH3 → BN + 3 H2O (T = 900 °C)
B2O3 + CO(NH2)2 → 2 BN + CO2 + 2 H2O (T > 1000 °C)
B2O3 + 3 CaB6 + 10 N2 → 20 BN + 3 CaO (T > 1500 °C)
MagnumOpus
Aloysius the Gaul
MagnumOpus
Technically, every jet leaves a trail of chemicals and a short lived fog, which dissipates and doesn't leave an 8 hour fog.
Wrong
Three contrail systems were analyzed with
geostationary satellite data to document the conversion of the
contrails to cirrus clouds. Two unique contrails, a pair of figure
eights and a NASA DC-8 oval, were tracked for more than 7
hours. A cluster of contrails from commercial aircraft lasted over
17 hours.
Yes, you are wrong. Because, the thread demonstrated that Commercial aircraft used chemtrail methods.
Just because NASA didn't include that chemtrails methods exist for Commercial aircraft fuels, just means they missed that point.
They needed to say if the planes used Boron loaded fuels or not.
They did note:
Contrails, as anthropogenic cirrus clouds, affect both the
radiation and hydrological cycle in a manner similar to other
cirrus clouds except that they may have different microphysical
properties [e.g., Gayet et al., 1996]. I
The microphysical property might be Boron seeded clouds.
When jet plumes run for that long---they are chemically helped.
P.S.: forgot one question. If benevolent boron is in such high usage, why is the stratosphere filled with aluminum?
The most common chemicals used for cloud seeding include silver iodide and dry ice (solid carbon dioxide). Liquid propane, which expands into a gas, has also been used. This can produce ice crystals at higher temperatures than silver iodide. The use of hygroscopic materials, such as table salt, is becoming more popular[citation needed] after promising research.[2]
Cloud seeding to increase snowfall is done when temperatures within the clouds are between 19 and minus-4 degrees Fahrenheit (between minus-7 and minus-20 degrees Celsius). This is the range at which silver iodide does its best work, as demonstrated by decades of research.[3] Introduction of a substance such as silver iodide, which has a crystalline structure similar to that of ice, will induce freezing nucleation.
-------
Cloud seeding is no longer considered a fringe science, and is considered a mainstream tool to improve rain precipitation and snow. New technology and research have produced reliable results that make cloud seeding a dependable and affordable water-supply practice for many regions.[3]
--------
To his astonishment, as soon as he breathed into the deep freezer, a bluish haze was noted, followed by an eye-popping display of millions of microscopic ice crystals, reflecting the strong light rays from the lamp illuminating a cross-section of the chamber. He instantly realized that he had discovered a way to change supercooled water into ice crystals. The experiment was easily replicated and he explored the temperature gradient to establish the −40˚C[21] limit for liquid water.
Dr. Irving Langmuir, high priest of scientific rainmaking, sounded a solemn warning last week: those who sow too many rainstorms may reap nothing but droughts. Speaking at the School of Mines in drought-threatened New Mexico, Langmuir denounced the commercial rainmakers, many of them woefully ignorant of the art, who are seeding the atmosphere with silver iodide throughout the dry Southwest. "Some of them," he said, "are using hundreds of thousands of times too much. No more than one milligram [.000035 oz] of silver iodide should be used for every cubic mile of air."...
-------------
Dr. Irving Langmuir, pioneer in “rainmaking,” said the government should seize on the phenomenon of weather control as it did on atomic energy when Albert Einstein told the late President Roosevelt in 1939 of the potential power of an atom-splitting weapon.
“In the amount of energy liberated, the effect of 30 milligrams of silver iodide [used to seed clouds] under optimum conditions equals that of one atomic bomb,” Langmuir said.
luxordelphi
reply to post by MagnumOpus
Killer thread! BUT...I have some questions and, of course, just to be completely up front - I am totally against the ongoing geo-engineering which you have the audacity to describe as a miracle from God. And...as far as a geo-engineering solution that is working: that's just nutty - look around and look up. And as far as being up front and honest - what is it with you guys?: is it always just baby steps and baby food? Every year the "truth of the hour" is revealed.
I'm still pondering the Mason part: Masons would have been employees in this Freon scandal, not players. Nations were players and there were two, at the time - the U.S. and the U.S.S.R. Perhaps not a plot, just abject ignorance?
How was Freon mistaken? Why was it thought to be inert and then not?
Whose brilliant idea was it to add ultrafine particles to the mix? How do geo-engineers propose to restrain micro-system events, which can't even be seen or even predicted or even known about, when macro events escape them?
Without knowledge of what precipitated the last ice age, how do geo-engineers propose to avoid that? Because, without anthropological interference, the earth quite handily survived a cooling cycle: 3550 BC to 1850 AD, without going into full blown ice. Unlike what happened 12,000 BC to 8,000 BC. And handily survived the intervening warming cycle as well.
If sudden stratospheric warming is by device, what assurances are given that the troposphere will cool proportionately? It's not happening in Australia. And if you all create regional atmospheric climates, where is the global impact statement? And does it come back to bite?
And what about the bad ozone? The ozone that deflates your basketball overnight (lol). Only curbing emissions will stop that.
The Good, the Bad and the Ozone
P.S.: forgot one question. If benevolent boron is in such high usage, why is the stratosphere filled with aluminum?edit on 12-3-2014 by luxordelphi because: forgot one question