It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
tigertatzen
reply to post by sparky31
post a pic of the burns,the forehead or a cheek,the lack of these pics raises questions.
Pretty sure she stated at the beginning that she does not have a camera or a camera-phone or a camcorder, or a webcam. This thread is getting derailed over and over again by people who are asking for pictures as "proof" of her claim. So here's some food for thought:
I am a make-up artist, and I can tell you right now that asking for a picture of the burned area would NOT constitute any type of verifiable proof. I could make someone look as if they suffered a burn in about 5 minutes with some ordinary makeup, and you would not be able to tell the difference. Sorry, but not having a picture of her scorched face does not make her story any less true, and it is patently silly for anyone to suggest otherwise. Not to mention blatant harassment, seeing as how she already told everyone that she does not own any devices of that type. I don't have a camera or a cell phone or a webcam, nor have I ever owned a television. There are in fact people out here in the world who don't have all the cool technological toys at their disposal.
I don't think that how many posts anyone has makes him/her/it more credible than others...I've been a member for a couple of years but don't have too many OP's under my belt simply because I do not have the time to spend online that others do. But i do agree with the assessment of some others who have stated they would vouch for Antar, and i have to say I am like-minded, because over time you figure out who is trustworthy on this site and who isn't. I believe her...if she says she saw it, she damn well saw it.
AngryScotsman
WilsonWilson
I thought this was an open forum, what has being a long term member or being new got to do with it, surely everybody should face the same questions?
Antar has CREDIBILITY, that's what it's got to do with it.
captb13
reply to post by DeadSeraph
I've been following this thread all day and I have to agree that this forum is a place for peoples experiences, not for people demanding absolute proof. I dont know the OP, but if she truely believes she saw something, then she did.
As for the jets practicing, there is really no such thing as a dogfight anymore. In air to air combat these days, with all the satellite tech, gps, radar, and computers, enemy planes will be taken out from miles away, long before they even see each other.edit on 3-2-2014 by captb13 because: (no reason given)
bitsforbytes
So are you the only witness to this event still?
Did you feel the boom? Like feel it in your chest like when you feel bass from a sub woofer?
If so then perhaps you could contact a seismologist in your area if there is one? The weather station to verify if they have equipment that could of recorded/tracked this?
Pics of your burnt face?edit on 3-2-2014 by bitsforbytes because: (no reason given)edit on 3-2-2014 by bitsforbytes because: (no reason given)
antar
reply to post by thesaneone
The Jets were coming in from several directions all aiming at the metallic object. Once the object dissipated and the Halo began, they flew off. They were incoming from all directions towards the object. I feel sorry for it. I have never seen jets fly that fast, that low at that speed or towards one another. It was pure experience.
DeadSeraph
smurfy
Jet pilots are not going to do target practice over a populated area, nor are they going to chase anything sonic in practice over a populated area, and since they would need to be beyond the sound barrier themselves. But it does seem that something, (the object) was pursued, and attacked or disabled in some way, and in Antar's words it 'dissipated', although that it dissipated wasn't clear in the first post.
Antar also say's her face felt like it was burning, (I would advise a trip to the doctor for that) and that's about it.
Time to go and figure it out in the real world for starters, and in the absence of any other witneses so far.
There is no proper reason then, to call BS as an answer to anything, because the reality is we don't know what happened, except in the way it was given. If you don't like the way it was given, figure out a possible scenario in your own terms.
OP claims the event occurred within one mile of her location, and that she is 45 miles north of springfield missouri. Looking at google maps, that does not appear to be a highly populated area at all and is surrounded by 4 state parks. Looks like the boonies to me. Maybe the OP could confirm.
Edit to add:
Also interesting to note that Whiteman AFB is north of that location.edit on 3-2-2014 by DeadSeraph because: (no reason given)
It has been stated in this thread several times that military exercises over central Missouri are fairly frequent, so most residents would think nothing of the noise, (maybe some irritation), and may not even look up. Filing complaints or reports, tweeting or face booking such activity every time it happened would be kinda silly.
bitsforbytes
So are you the only witness to this event still?
Did you feel the boom? Like feel it in your chest like when you feel bass from a sub woofer?
If so then perhaps you could contact a seismologist in your area if there is one? The weather station to verify if they have equipment that could of recorded/tracked this?
Pics of your burnt face?edit on 3-2-2014 by bitsforbytes because: (no reason given)edit on 3-2-2014 by bitsforbytes because: (no reason given)
Exactly. Between this thread and the Tara people thread, good chance any potential new members have been scared off. I know Antar wont shake easily to criticism,but others are sensitive and ridicule can destroy the best story which may in fact be true.
beezzer
Based on the reaction of this thread, if I saw something out of the ordinary, I'd be reluctant to share it.
On a conspiracy site no less!