It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
theabsolutetruth
reply to post by captb13
If she wanted to she could perhaps get a camera and post a picture of her burnt face, even if she said she didn't have a camera when it happened.
My suggestions weren't to make ''all of ATS believe'' but a gentle suggestion that MORE accounts or some sort of validation or detail would be called for for any belief at all, even a sketch of the event or incident including height, shape etc of alleged UFO and type of aircraft identification would be necessary for establishing more facts, which, whether you or anyone else likes it or not, would be essential in any serious incident report of such a nature.
If it was a real UFO or even a missile or military action and it burnt her face she would need to answer a whole load more questions from any authorities should she want answers from them, and most people would.
Has she contacted any authorities, did they say anything etc, all are things that count as DETAILS.
Put it this way, if I just seen something like that I would be all out for finding answers and getting ID on the planes and their origin would be a priority.
How do you expect the world to take such sightings seriously when people like you are saying ''oh well whatever she can just say it and that's all that's needed'' because it isn't, so put your blinkers back on and lets hear some details.
If you want fuzzy frou frou ''omg I just saw a UFO'' nonsense you will find youtube a vast resource of those.
The more serious believers in UFO and even skeptics here at ATS should and do expect more.edit on 3-2-2014 by theabsolutetruth because: (no reason given)
DeadSeraph
bigfatfurrytexan
reply to post by DeadSeraph
The A-10 is capable of flying in a circular pattern and deploying a large amount of ammunition. Its a flying war fortress.
A mundane explanation, no matter how tenuous, could be at hand here.
I'm inclined to agree. The OP identified the f-22 as being similar to the jets she said she saw but no f-22 squadrons are stationed at whiteman AFB. It's possible a squadron could be there on a training exercise, however. Of the 3 types of jets stationed at whiteman AFB, only the t-38 trainer is capable of breaking the sound barrier.
sparky31
i,m not asking for anything that i haven,t been pulled up myself about,what cause shes a regular poster shes exempt from providing some proof about it?all i,ve got is cause she said it then it must be true.
everyones quick in saying proof or it aint true to most of the other posters on here,why is this one different?
BurningSpearess
Mods, could someone confirm if the OP was originally placed in Gray Area?
This might help additionally combat some the posters commenting on this thread...
Many thanksedit on 3-2-2014 by BurningSpearess because: bold emphasis
Illuminawty
reply to post by antar
Kids and their drugs.
JayinAR
Also, as has been well established, Antar is a long time member in good standing here.
Perhaps next time instead of criticizing the OP's character we can address the claims on their merit??
"Pics or it didn't happen" is freaking lame
xavi1000
BurningSpearess
Mods, could someone confirm if the OP was originally placed in Gray Area?
This might help additionally combat some the posters commenting on this thread...
Many thanksedit on 3-2-2014 by BurningSpearess because: bold emphasis
It was not originally placed in Gray Area.