Rendlesham Forest…, A Christmas Story from 1980 - Can We ‘Let it Be’?

a reply to: ConfusedBrit

You really are confused re larry Warrens pending movie, so you are going to watch the movie despite having said earlier it is likely to be unreliable and a whole load of other mumbo jumbo.

Obviously there could be moments that actually help the bigger picture.

Really? But you said its all going to be unreliable bla bla bla so am not sure how that one will work for you.

Never mind CB. I have read enough but thanks for the explanation .

originally posted by: mirageman
a reply to: AdamE

RFI Solved along with much of the mysteries of the known universe. Just in time I'd say.

Although plenty of things to consider I'll keep to one single point/

Then the phenomenon finds Jim and John (and Ed?) more interesting due to the biological nature and DNA vibrational signal, when they appear?

There was a lot of DNA out there, it was a forest with wildlife, and also human beings in farms and cottages and a huge military base with thousands of personnel nearby about a half mile to a mile away. Can you actually clarify what you think happened here?

I look forward to what Adam has to say on the matter

originally posted by: KellyPrettyBear
a reply to: Baablacksheep

Out of nowhere Adam has coughed up a lot of stuff which seems to build
on things with which I'm very familiar.

So I used social media to interact with him?

Sometimes things really are that simple.

Kev

Sorry you have lost me, most information that I have seen is freely available on the internet Kevin.
But back to Adam, it will be nice to see how he explains what he has posted.
See Miragemans question to Adam.

No problem with your own comments and theories, I'm just remarking re Adam at this point.

While I am here it is noted that John has now said Rendlesham is now solved for him. It was in response to a person asking if Rendlesham is now solved. With this in mind is this now "case closed"....

a reply to: Baablacksheep

You have lost me too.

Regarding Adam, he always has something interesting to say, and I always
look forward to his contributions. I don't see what we are discussing here..
there are always questions for Adam and he may or may not answer them
in a way that satisfies the questioner, just like anyone.

Regarding "RFI solved" --- anyone can claim that.

In fact I believe I claimed that a year or so ago.. and I still pretty much
stand by that too.

Everyone has a different burden of proof, and either are, or are not willing
to use subjective information and give it credence.

Kev

a reply to: KellyPrettyBear

I have not asked a question to Adam, just expressed I look forward to his explanation in regards to what Mirageman had asked , nothing more.

Regarding RFI solved, those are John Burroughs claims.

originally posted by: Baablacksheep

You really are confused re larry Warrens pending movie, so you are going to watch the movie despite having said earlier it is likely to be unreliable and a whole load of other mumbo jumbo.

Yes, most likely it will be unreliable mumbo jumbo. Hardly an extravagant suggestion.

But yes, it's also likely to be very entertaining indeed. Which has nothing to do with its veracity. I can juggle the two.

And yes, some elements, no matter how tiny, and no matter how unlikely, COULD help the bigger picture.


Are we clear now?

Anyway, I'm glad you seem to be looking forward to it, Baa, if I read you correctly. What do you think Larry can bring to the game this time? And do you think Heseltine is wise to invest so fully in Larry's version of Capel Green? (As I said before, I do hope he brings some focus and clarity to Larry's life, even if not the case itself.)

a reply to: ConfusedBrit

Thanks for the response.

Anyway, I'm glad you seem to be looking forward to it, Baa, if I read you correctly.

I have not given any indication what I feel

I was simply curious as to your reasoning re Larry Warren etc .

Yes we are clear now.

I prefer to decline on any personal thoughts I may have re Larry and Heseltine, but I appreciate your questioning.
CB.

Baa - thanks for telling us about Burrough's farewell to Rendlesham. He says he has a couple of loose ends to tie up, but basically the party's over for him.

He gives us this touching poem:

And my heart is like the setting sun,
Setting on the things I wish I'd done.
It's time to say goodbye to yesterday.
This is where the cowboy rides away.

***sniff*** Quite touching, isn't it? I always liked John and respected him as one of the more open and honest RFI personnel.


I wrongly thought the "very very important" show he mentions was last Thursday's Phenomenon with Moulton Howe (who I try to avoid like the plague). Oh well, here's my report:

I twitched at Moulton Howe's voice but struggled through. Burroughs sounded very tired and frankly a bit fed up of the whole circus as HP Lovecraft fan Peter Levenda discussed the notion of quantum entanglement within our consciousness, and suggested the calling card of the Phenomenon lies within DNA, potentially transferred to children via genetic code. JB reacted uncomfortably to the notion of alien hybrids and wondered if a child could have no heritage or genetic antecedent - clearly getting confused!

Moulton Howe suddenly gabbles about imprinted panels in the Roswell case (my head hits the floor) before JB gets her back on track, but yeah, he doesn't sound happy.

As for the other show, someone else will have to report on that since this one left me exhausted and totally Moulton Howed. I need a G&T.

a reply to: ConfusedBrit

What was the important show if not the Levenda one?

a reply to: ConfusedBrit

Hi CB

Am poor on time today but just a few words.

I found the show fascinating indeed.😁

To be continued.

a reply to: ConfusedBrit

Basically the answer was consciousness as opposed to unconsciousness. It's all in your head. Whatever you thought happened did and it was all about frequency, light and vibration.

Reality is not how you look at it. Reality is how you see it...

Maybe you believe it?

a reply to: ConfusedBrit

Baa - thanks for telling us about Burrough's farewell to Rendlesham. He says he has a couple of loose ends to tie up, but basically the party's over for him.

You are welcome. Of course the horse picture and the pretty poetry we see at least 2 times a year then the next day he is back chattering away. I actually think John secretly enjoys the little crying icons when people tick his post and jabber on wishing him well. It is interesting too that he now appears to have closure ,but does all of that mean the case is now closed or simply closure just for John?

Peter was very interesting to listen to and easy on the ears. I found several aspects really thought provoking, from the remote viewing plasma stuff to DNA and all the rest of it. Some of which Adam has brought here on this page, but much better to listen to it been discussed than actually reading about it. The DNA stuff really caught my attention and one could almost hear Johns mind working overtime. Remember he himself has special DNA as well as his son. It seems he wants to talk more off air too. I see Pandora's box with many things, but I will keep this short and sweet. I look forward to listening more to Peter in the future, there was an indication of him been on the show again. I would certainly suggest others listen to it time permitting and see what they make of it and what they think re Peter levenda too.

Who has the link to Peter Levenda talking?

All those papers I wrote and sent out to researchers marked as "ANON"
as the author seem to have traveled the world a few times and influenced
various people. I'm just curious what has been created.

Thanks.

a reply to: KellyPrettyBear

kgraradioarchives.com...

a reply to: Baablacksheep

TY you Maam.

a reply to: Baablacksheep

Lavenda is an interesting one, considering his ttsa links. He appears to be more...credible!?!?

He has his own past and on his interview with dolan a few months ago he presented himself very well and distanced himself from TTSA whilst also acknowledging he's worked for them, in regard to the books.

He's certainly an interesting fellow...

As for Burroughs stating he has closure on Rendlesham? I don't know., time will tell on that one.

Some people become obcessed and can't let things go, some dip in and out and some leave it and get on with their lives...guess we will find out which one in the coming months / years.

I personally wouldn't be surprised if he left the whole field completely and stopped partnering LMH on KGRA, but that's just a guess...

originally posted by: pigsy2400
a reply to: Baablacksheep

Lavenda is an interesting one, considering his ttsa links. He appears to be more...credible!?!?

How so? I think he knows his audience and isn't about to bite the hand that feeds him. I am not his audience, I know that and I also don't like poking at people's beliefs. I can suspend my disbelief in order to explore all sorts of unknowns but I can't go as far as to ignore knowns and really don't get why I would want to unless I was looking for a belief system. I understand that belief-systems play an important role in society and serve functions beyond a need to have beliefs to help guide us through whatever life throws at us, and I have no difficulty respecting that, and that like-minded people will group together in order to be like-minded but I do have some difficulty when those beliefs are packaged as truth based upon highly subjective interpretations of a cherry-picked history, it's just breeding ignorance.

The desire that Levenda speaks of, of people who feel that they don't belong here on this planet is very little different to God's instruction to Abraham to scatter his seed to the four corners of the Earth except now with the expansion into the Universe. Perhaps, in both cases, it is our reptilian brain (if we use the triune model) responding to overcrowding, environmental contamination or whatever, a base drive to disperse the clade, who knows, and perhaps colonisation of space is one of the answers to that growing dilemma and an option that does need ideas and innovation directed towards it, but we are a long way from overcoming the difficulties and there are more pressing problems to overcome which require us to face reality a little more honestly. Which is why I personally find it hard to leave this subject alone. They could simply believe, and that is no business of mine whatsoever, or they are promoting a belief for another purpose and don't actually believe themselves but want others to.

a reply to: pigsy2400

Lavenda is an interesting one, considering his ttsa links. He appears to be more...credible!?!?

This I do not know Pigs, obviously all of that is very much up for question? But yes a very interesting gentleman indeed.
However I was more interested in specific things discussed in the show with Peter, that partly was the DNA element which of course would be a topic of serious interest to John.


Here is a recap re Peter and the Tommy stuff.
www.youtube.com...

Now that John is "stepping aside" I wonder what the next stage of the game shall be?

Also will Adam still bring us treats?

A few things to ponder?

And last but not least , will this "stepping aside" mean the end of John and linda together on the radio show???

😎