Rendlesham Forest…, A Christmas Story from 1980 - Can We ‘Let it Be’?

a reply to: mirageman

im interested in this satellite theory.


you said that some people believe that a satellite was involved? do you have a link so i can read about this i haven't heard this part yet.

a reply to: mirageman

I have spent the afternoon going through some old blog sites from 2008. So much to through read, so my apologies for any delay in replying.

Also to note, Microwave Interferometry which has recently been referenced by Joseph P. Farrell from Jim Keith book Secret and Suppressed,
gizadeathstar.com...

It is also used as a powerful means to study Plasma while causing minimal perturbation of the Plasma.

originally posted by: penroc3
a reply to: mirageman

im interested in this satellite theory.


you said that some people believe that a satellite was involved? do you have a link so i can read about this i haven't heard this part yet.

Perhaps start with this : www.abovetopsecret.com...

There are also some clues here : www.abovetopsecret.com...

It's not all relevant but it's interesting....

If you get through all that then some things are not on the web.

originally posted by: mirageman
a reply to: AdamE

This was the relevant Cook Report I believe. Although more than just TV interference was going on.

Looking forward to catching up here (and elsewhere) and working my way backwards. I believe there is an aggregate of evidence that's very suggestive and if I recall there are other cases in the U.K. where radar and microwave research is strongly suspected as causing folk problems. Good vid.

Making a solid case and identifying the exact nature of specific research against official secrets is not likely of course. The varied side effects of various EM fields is well known as we here know and fall well within the range of the experiences at RFI.

While I don't agree with all of Albert Buddens conclusion, I do think his research is very germane and fairly enlightening.

As always; great discussion and research here.

👍👍👍

a reply to: The GUT

Considering what we do know, EMF interference, exposure of personell to THz based radiation, issues in the area in regards to BOL and it's own history in regards to that, nearby OTH radar systems and it's effects on cars and green blobs/fireballs seen in the sky before the RFI, Russian satellites supposedly bring brought down and fragmenting,increased meteor activity, NSA connections with the Base, high ranking officials flying in shortly after, storage of nuclear weapons OR other classified weapons, that regardless were not supposed to be there. PHEW!

For me very much points of a terrestial military cause for all the issues, most of the points above mostly took place, allegedly within a very small geographical area, which if you think about it, is insane.

I stand by my earlier hypothesis that it was either a field weapons test on military personnel and/or a classified communications test.

We will never know, but damn, it's fun trying to figure it out.

pigsy

a reply to: pigsy2400

Depending on what references you use, there have supposedly
been reports of black triangle UFOs back to the time of
Columbus.

As I say repeatedly.. I'm all for a heavy role of human technology
at RFI..

But if people just 'hand wave' things like Persigner effects and
hypnosis, I find that to be a form of denial, not to be a form
of explanation.

Of course both effects could have been at play.

Explain the BTUFO AS A BTUFO, not as something else,
whatever it is.. then I'll be really impressed.

Very similiar "BTUFO" sightings (sans the symbols
usually) have been associated with cattle mutiliations
in the USA from the 70's to the current day... i'm talking
about the same 'triangular rabbit scratch marks' on
the ground in multiple cases.

Unless you throw out the "craft" entirely, and arbitrarily,
whatever happened at RFI was not entirely a one-time
event, but something that is ongoing to this very day.

I'm still agreeing with Direne actually.. RFI, even if a
planned test, or even if it was a satellite retrieval
thing as well.. seems to have had a significant
accidental intersection of events as well.

Kev

a reply to: mirageman

reading material for tonight, thank you.

Gut: there was a Dr. in canada(i think) who made something called the god helmet that used magnetic solenoids on a football helmet, that when actuated would case people to have OBEs and even have the start of an abduction experience and even see 'people' standing in front of them albeit looking gray(in color)

even seeing balls of light in the room. I

in one interview the good Dr. proclaimed that he could explain strange esp, ufo etc by the actions of strange magnetic field.


but from what i can remember the Dr. got a HUGE contact with some agency in the us and packed up his equipment and has gone dark.

wiki link to god helmet

a reply to: penroc3

Persinger.

I have no argument with his basic research and findings..
the brain is a computer and if you jimmy it up, almost
anything is possible in terms of perception.

This sort of thing is definitely worth considering as a portion
of the big picture.

a reply to: KellyPrettyBear

well the question is, are the fields creating the effects or removing the filters and allowing humans to see them?


i would love to try it out, the helmet that is. but i don't know if i would recommend someone who hasn't had any strange happenings in their life trying it out JUST in case you took more home with you then just a strange story.


and why would people all have the same sightings under the influence of this helmet, to me it would seen that random fields would just induce noisey signals and the helmet seems to be a bit more then random noise. but then agin maybe the brain is just trying its best to sort it out.

a reply to: pigsy2400

Wrong. Some do know.

a reply to: KellyPrettyBear

Yes you do repeat things Kev. I think most get the idea by now.

a reply to: KellyPrettyBear

...Unless you throw out the "craft" entirely, and arbitrarily, whatever happened at RFI was not entirely a one-time event, but something that is ongoing to this very day.....

Question : Who exactly saw this BTUFO in Rendlesham Forest?

a reply to: penroc3

and why would people all have the same sightings under the influence of this helmet

That is a good question alright. The question.

One might also wonder why people who abuse one particular illegal
drug tend to all see a 'dog'.

Why do various people hear "machine voices", in radically different scenarios?

There are probably a variety of other scenarios that could be mentioned.

Kev

a reply to: Baablacksheep

I know that I'm annoying. That is one of two reasons that I'm
scaling back my ATS involvement.

That---and I think my "second brain" is finally closing in on
something that has been processing for many years.

I need a bit more quiet time for some of the processing to
finish.

a reply to: KellyPrettyBear

Lol thank the gods we all have humour Kev.

a reply to: mirageman

Question : Who exactly saw this BTUFO in Rendlesham Forest?

I have no idea who saw it other than Penniston.

Actually.. for some years I had been discounting Penniston's entire
testimony, as he doesn't come across as a credible witness,

but when i saw for the first time what he had drawn.. when i realized
that many others have seen his 'craft' or something very similar.. and
many others have even seen his 'rabbit scratchings' all over the world
both before and after RFI, I am now forced to take him more seriously.

Other than the 'binary download' of course. That's pure and total
rubbish.

His "symbols" are pretty much total rubbish too.

Time theories resulting from his experiencer syndrome.. or "mother ship"
stuff -- total rubbish it would appear.

But I suppose one never knows.. sometimes a little nugget comes out
accidentally.

Now perhaps Mr. MM, you are circling me around to have to admit,
that Penniston is the only one (probably) who saw the "craft", and
that was due to the close proximity to the radiation which caused
him to "persinger hallucinate".

And I was on board with that for years too.

Only--- some people see what he saw, when apparently they are
miles away... presumably far outside the range of most any
hypothetical 'field'.

But granted.. close proximity might open up the perception
capability more readily... and the people who see "BTUFO"
at range might be more special cases.

Don't know quite yet. Working on it though.

Kev

a reply to: Baablacksheep

It's been supremely frustrating for me too.

People seem so dense, ignoring what is important and obsessing
about stuff that is almost pointless.

But of course nerds like me who try to pin people up against the
wall and go on about stuff they will never understand or care
about seldom 'get it' just how annoying they are themselves.

That it took me 5 years to figure that out is really shameful.


Kev

a reply to: KellyPrettyBear

No trickery here Kev. Read the witness statements. Who says they say a triangular UFO? None of them.

Now read the Halt memo written a couple of weeks afterwards.

a reply to: mirageman

Penniston's picture was triangular, no?

Now you know I live half in a daze, when it comes to mundane
facts, as my mind can't tear itself away from what I'm obsessing
about..

would you be so kind..

to connect the dots for me/us here?

How credible is that picture in terms of known timeline?

Do you think that picture was fed to him by another person
at a later time?

Now... even if the "triangular UFO" was a complete sham..
it's very interesting that it was fed to him..

as I literally saw something very similar myself.. and nobody
fed that image to me..

nobody fed it to the people in the 1600's... they believed in
angels and demons..

what exactly are you saying here?

PS:

There's an assumption on my part that is probalby invovled
here too... people who have 'experiencer syndrome' have
their brain reeling for some time... and in an effort to
make sense of what the saw/experienced, they usually
keep revising their story for some time.

Now at first I had assumed that Penniston had done this..
so I didn't pay his testimony much mind..

and that still might be the case..

Now I went back and took a quick look at the Halt memo..
I don't see where he got "extraterrestrial event cover up"
from the little that he saw, if anything.

a reply to: mirageman

If witness statements are to be believed then a few people saw a large flying black triangle looking for something and was sending beams/laser come into the weapon storage areas.

Another interesting little explanation of this even was offered by the user astr0 but I think he was just a super good storyteller

Have your read his explanation of this event?