It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
TechniXcality
reply to post by alldaylong
are seriously debating if conquest was ever sought in Scotland by the British? Sure eventually the people succumbed and joined the union, so i suppose America never conquered Iraq? Apples and oranges but the occupation led to a mock government put in place.
wikipedia en.wikipedia.org...
alldaylong
TechniXcality
reply to post by alldaylong
are seriously debating if conquest was ever sought in Scotland by the British? Sure eventually the people succumbed and joined the union, so i suppose America never conquered Iraq? Apples and oranges but the occupation led to a mock government put in place.
wikipedia en.wikipedia.org...
Do you actually know why Scotland "Joined" the union?
As a country it was financially bankrupt. It's only salvation was to join the Union.
www.theguardian.com...
TechniXcality
alldaylong
TechniXcality
reply to post by alldaylong
are seriously debating if conquest was ever sought in Scotland by the British? Sure eventually the people succumbed and joined the union, so i suppose America never conquered Iraq? Apples and oranges but the occupation led to a mock government put in place.
wikipedia en.wikipedia.org...
Do you actually know why Scotland "Joined" the union?
As a country it was financially bankrupt. It's only salvation was to join the Union.
www.theguardian.com...
yes i'm aware... Years of conquest and war inter turmoil tend to have those financial consequences at least for the underdog. Its only salvation ha, that's a good one
The Union was instigated at the behest of Scotland, or at least the ruling class of Scotland at the time.
And heaven forbid what price the EU would extract from Scotland for 'allowing' it to use the Euro - and in bear in mind automatic entry into the EU is far from guaranteed.
And that pinpoints the problem. The machinations of the Scottish and English ruling families have always been self serving first.
Give the people the chance to vote on there own independence.
It seems interesting to me that a lot of folks speaking out against the idea are English. Why is that if Scotland is so equal and all that?
That's a double edge sword you just wrote. Its an easy and quiet convenient perspective to give hats off and pats on the back to the victories and spoils of your descendants. Its a much harder and damn right proud to acknowledge your failures and to become independent, which i'm sure Scotland would fare just well. Remember when a story is told, you must consider the person telling that story.
alldaylong
TechniXcality
alldaylong
TechniXcality
reply to post by alldaylong
are seriously debating if conquest was ever sought in Scotland by the British? Sure eventually the people succumbed and joined the union, so i suppose America never conquered Iraq? Apples and oranges but the occupation led to a mock government put in place.
wikipedia en.wikipedia.org...
Do you actually know why Scotland "Joined" the union?
As a country it was financially bankrupt. It's only salvation was to join the Union.
www.theguardian.com...
yes i'm aware... Years of conquest and war inter turmoil tend to have those financial consequences at least for the underdog. Its only salvation ha, that's a good one
Never let the truth get in the way of a good story
alldaylong
reply to post by GreyGoo
When i see someone use an extract from "Braveheart" i liken it to someone using an extract from " Winne The Poo". Both total fiction.
captiva
As a Scotsman I can see no logical reason to oppose it. Right now we have uncertainty with English rule, much better uncertainty and Scottish rule. The future generations, my grandkids deserve to have a say in "Their" own country and its for that that I am campaigning with all my heart for a yes vote.
Something that may not be so obvious to our foreign brothers and sisters who might be reading this thread is the fact that the Orange Order will hold a trump card in the final referendum. With thousands of members here in Scotland and with the fact they have been ordered by their hierarchy to vote no, this adds another side to the independence argument.
It would be a sad day indeed if the future of Scotland was decided 400 years ago through religion and in-bred hatred but that Im afraid is one of the options that could happen.
What other country in the world wants to be ruled from another country....I hope and prey that when the time comes the yes vote will win.
Respectsedit on 25-11-2013 by captiva because: (no reason given)
The Scotish people are a fiercely proud people - and rightly so - do you honestly think they would have put up with over 300 years of the sort of subjugation you seem to believe they've endured?
TechniXcality
That's a double edge sword you just wrote. Its an easy and quiet convenient perspective to give hats off and pats on the back to the victories and spoils of your descendants. Its a much harder and damn right proud to acknowledge your failures and to become independent, which i'm sure Scotland would fare just well. Remember when a story is told, you must consider the person telling that story.
alldaylong
TechniXcality
alldaylong
TechniXcality
reply to post by alldaylong
are seriously debating if conquest was ever sought in Scotland by the British? Sure eventually the people succumbed and joined the union, so i suppose America never conquered Iraq? Apples and oranges but the occupation led to a mock government put in place.
wikipedia en.wikipedia.org...
Do you actually know why Scotland "Joined" the union?
As a country it was financially bankrupt. It's only salvation was to join the Union.
www.theguardian.com...
yes i'm aware... Years of conquest and war inter turmoil tend to have those financial consequences at least for the underdog. Its only salvation ha, that's a good one
Never let the truth get in the way of a good story
Bassago
reply to post by Freeborn
The Scotish people are a fiercely proud people - and rightly so - do you honestly think they would have put up with over 300 years of the sort of subjugation you seem to believe they've endured?
Maybe after they saw what the US, India and a few other places had to go through to get away from England they didn't feel like it was possible. That's just a guess though.
As far as their independence all I'm saying is the people should get to vote on it whenever they want. I hope they chose the path to independence, lord knows it's been a long time since they were. Freedom and total self determination is always the best ultimate choice IMO.