It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
windword
reply to post by texastig
There is no such thing as original sin! You won't find it in the Old Testament, as a matter of fact, the OT teaching AGAINST original sin. Jesus never taught it! So where did it come from? Paul made it up!
Jesus did mention that a man had to be born again
!CRUCIFY HIM!
!CRUCIFY HIM!
!CRUCIFY HIM!
BO XIAN
reply to post by SuperFrog
Welllllllllllllll . . . part of the label is sure correct
You seem to have a habit of being SUPER WRONG.
Thanks for the insult, anyway. I happen to be 66+ years old.
You're WRONG again:
I have asked questions--uncomfortable questions of virtually all authorities all my life.
THANKFULLY, I've been able to have a significant degree of fair-mindedness and enough smarts to realize that there are real answers based on solid evidence that folks can put confidence in.
Again . . . Gary and friend's psychological research has revealed that 70-85% of the religious doubters
DOUBT BECAUSE OF EMOTIONAL REASONS--nothing to do with purported "science" or "solid evidence."
SuperFrog
But once I tried to look for historical facts regarding those stories, or the one regarding Koran, everyone agreed that there is none, except some 'so called' expert who went into length as you did, to explain bible historically by using bible.
SuperFrog
voyger2
Nobody haves to prove Jesus to anyone. Jesus will prove to everyone, by Himself, when the time comes for you.
Read the Gospel of the four Evangelists, Matthew, John, Mark and Luke and feel the presence of Him (Jesus, God) inside you, in your life, in your mistakes and in your hopes and expectations for life.
One day (I truly hope) you will know, that He is the Path, the Truth and the Life.
Let the light of God via the Holy Spirit guide you my friend.
Let me get this correctly.... you believe ONLY your religion being true... while others believe you are wrong and them being right...
DeadSeraph
reply to post by ltheghost
Here we go again with Joseph Atwill's nonsense. I have spent far too much time looking into his claims and debunking them on ATS, and I have no interest in doing so again. What I have discovered is concrete proof that his claims are completely bogus, but no amount of evidence was good enough for his adherents, and they basically just plugged their ears and screamed as loud as they could no matter which facts were presented to them that effectively dismantled their claims.
Atwill is a snake oil salesman and nothing more. His goal is to sell books, not discuss the truth. All of his claims fall apart under the light of history (history which anyone can research if they are so inclined). The simple fact of the matter is that history indicates that Christ was a real person, and that people willingly went to their deaths in defence of their belief in Him. Nothing Atwill is claiming is "new". All of his claims have already been discussed in his books as well as on threads here at ATS, and I see nothing in the article that indicates he has any "new evidence". Just more of his tired claims that the romans invented Christianity because he says so.
History, logic, and reason all stand opposed to Joseph Atwill and his claims, and the only way it is possible to agree with his conclusions is to abandon all three in favor of Atwill's version of events. This is the textbook definition of confirmation bias, because a person has to want Jesus to be a fable to conclude that Atwill is anything other than a joke. He has basically completely reinvented history to suit his personal agenda. People capable of critical thinking would dismiss him outright because of this, but because he attacks religion people buy his books and parrot his nonsense. If a scientist did this, he'd be out of work and in need of a career change.
ltheghost
DeadSeraph
reply to post by ltheghost
This is the first I ever heard of the guy. LOL, I'm not big into this stuff but this did catch my eye a little. I don't post often here, but I figured someone on here would know something about him and what he was talking about.
wildtimes
reply to post by BO XIAN
BO,
I don't think anyone here has said "we hate you." Or "I hate you."
You are sensationalizing and projecting your own hatred onto people participating in this thread (besides using questionable/discredited sources, and calling us names and being arrogant).
Those of us who question the Bible's veracity and value as a "history book", (let alone 'the Word of God'), have done our homework, too. Your continued insults are not reflecting a loving, warm, mature, level-headed, compassionate adult, "sweetie."
Treat others the way you want to be treated.
It's not surprising that some folks refuse to look in the truly scholarly directions.
BO XIAN
NOPE.
Nonsense.
"everyone" did NOT agree to that.
BO XIAN
As Gary noted in his video . . . less than 30% of any remotely authentic scholars agree with even parts of such perspectives.
That's the facts.
There's plenty of external VERIFICATIONS OF BIBLICAL ASSERTIONS AND FACTS.
BO XIAN
It's not surprising that some folks refuse to look in the truly scholarly directions.
Even the liberal non-Christian but true scholars castigate the pseudo-pretend "scholars" coming up with such garbage. Thankfully they have more integrity about the real facts than many on ATS.
.
Jesus did not by any stretch preach reincarnation.
voyger2
Please clam yourself. I didn't said nothing like that. You are free to believe anything that you want (include here any religion). It's your heart that will help you decide. Be in peace, my friend.
Matthew 11
A prophet?
Yes, I tell you, and more than a prophet.
10 This is he of whom it is written,
‘Behold, I send my messenger before your face, who will prepare your way before you.’
11 Truly, I say to you, among those born of women there has arisen no one greater than John the Baptist. Yet the one who is least in the kingdom of heaven is greater than he.
12 From the days of John the Baptist until now the kingdom of heaven has suffered violence, and the violent take it by force.
13 For all the Prophets and the Law prophesied until John,
14 and if you are willing to accept it, he is Elijah who is to come.
There was a logical reason why the Emperor was opposed to the concept that all of mankind originally came from God and was returing to God via the cycle of birth and death. Justinian had been convinced by high ranking cardinals that it was not in the interest of the empire to allow Origen's writings to continue to be copied and distributed. A powerful group of Cardinal’s and Bishop’s explained that if every soul had once pre-existed with God, then Christ wasn’t anything special to have come from God. These Cardinals convinced the Emperor that if people realized they were the children of God they might begin to believe they no longer needed an Emperor, or to pay taxes, or to obey the Holy Church. But since they reasoned that only Christ had come from God but God made brand new souls at the time of conception and only the Holy Church could bring these souls to God. Without the protection of the Empire or the guidance of the church, all people would be doomed to be forever cut off from God in Hell. This doctrine was very acceptabloe to the Emperor. Once Justinian understood the political danger inherent in Origen’s teachings, the rest was simply an Emperor doing what was in his best interest.