It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by wildtimes
Ho boy. Another who doesn't read my posts enough to "get me."
I found the video on youtube right after I watched andy06's clip of Stacy Doolley. It just popped up on the sidebar of "related" type vids. I clicked it, based on the title, and I watched it. Period. Then I posted it and asked "is this legit?"
Originally posted by wildtimes
I haven't done that. I said, "Here is a video I found that confuses me, and I'd like to know what Muslim ATS members make of it, please. Is it real? Is it sensationalized? RIGHT FROM THE START I doubted its veracity. How was I to know the interviewees were "not experts"? I ran across the video, watched it, and had questions. LIKE MANY OTHERS HERE WHO ACTUALLY WATCHED IT.
Originally posted by wildtimes
Um.... No. EVERYONE does not want peace. And those who do NOT want peace are the problem. Those who want to bring on "Armageddon" and who labor under the wrong impression that suicide bombing is a way to get to heaven ... DO NOT want peace. They want to destroy enough of humanity to "force" the 'second coming' and the stupid 'prophecies.'
Originally posted by wildtimes
No, I don't "style myself" as a Social Worker. I hold a Master's Degree in Social Work, and I know my job, and although here it's for FREE, I do it anyway. MSW. Not self-styled.
Originally posted by wildtimes
Now, as far as this specific thread goes, how are you pursuing this goal of peace?
By educating myself and allowing other Westerners who have questions to see both sides of the equation and figure out what in the hell is going on around us. By encouraging dialogue, compassion, cultural competency, tolerance, and altruism.
Originally posted by wildtimes
reply to post by logical7
First the atheist communists when US was more religious and now the extremely religious jihadists! when its more secular.
WHOA. Stop. Right there. ATHEIST DOES NOT EQUAL "communist." OMG.
So maybe we have finally identified the "stereotyping" that leads to your confusion.
Your thread regarding 'why should immoral people change?' already covered this topic - and it was CLEARLY pointed out that ATHEISTS have MORALS.
COMMUNISM is something else entirely, and you are WRONG to link them. WRONG.
Show me a video saying that atheists are immoral communists, and I will pick it apart just as you all have done with the vid in the OP.
FOUL! yellow flag on the field.
Shame on you!! Take a time out.
By a person who knows what the hell they are talking about. Do not EVEN try to pretend that it's all a lie and a fairy tale! It is based on reality. And REALITY is what we have to deal with. Shame on you again if you dismiss literature as "fiction." Those types of books are FAR more "revealing" of real-world issues
The annual “freedom of thought” report from the International Humanist and Ethical Union, an advocacy umbrella group that represents and seeks to protect non-religious people, details laws and practices around the world that punish or restrict atheism. The group presented the report to the United Nations today.
The report tracks, among other things, which countries have laws explicitly targeting atheists. There are not many, but the states that forbid non-religiousness – typically as part of “anti-blasphemy” legislation – include seven nations where atheism is punishable by death. All seven establish Islam as the state religion.
Though that list includes some dictatorships, the country that appears to most frequently condemn atheists to death for their beliefs is actually a democracy, if a frail one: Pakistan. Others include Saudi Arabia, Iran, Afghanistan, Sudan, the West African state of Mauritania, and the Maldives, an island nation in the Indian Ocean.
I think the OP has been debunked and wildtimes herself accepted it.
The thread is now just wandering except you trying to still somehow prove that islam is violent by asking leading questions or assuming the refusal of posters to indulge you as a proof that your assumtions are true, just like you did about the video in OP. Asking muslims to respond to video without ever asking a straight question.
When somebody does answer you. You ask the same question in another twisted way till you get the answer you want and when you don't get it you call muslim posters evasive?
so basically we are evasive and "afraid" because we don't give you answers that you want.
Charles, muslims are not going to agree to something thats not true no matter how well you put it to lead and bait them.
You are free to make sentences/questions that indulge/confirm your own opinions and feel pleased with yourself.
Originally posted by logical7
reply to post by wildtimes
"5:48 And We have revealed to you, [O Muúammad], the Book in truth, confirming that which preceded it of the Scripture and as a criterion over it. So judge between them by what Allah has revealed and do not follow their inclinations away from what has come to you of the truth. To each of you We prescribed a law and a method. Had Allah willed, He would have made you one nation [united in religion], but [He intended] to test you in what He has given you; so race to [all that is] good. To Allah is your return all together, and He will [then] inform you concerning that over which you used to differ."
not everyone in either of the Abrahamic religions would be true to its teachings, its a test about who really believes in God and does good and who makes the religion/sect just a way to boost ego and think he/she is righteous and others doomed.
I read the articles and i know who actually rules Iran and what really happens in Iran but why are you mentioning it?
Originally posted by wildtimes
reply to post by mindlessbrainpower89
Tell me, what is so wrong with being a zionist? I support them. I guess I am wrong too?
You are if you also promote bombing people and starting wars over it.
I support the NWO insofar as the idea is a peaceful planet with everyone on the same page and everyone having what they need. I do NOT support the ridiculous notion of them wanting to "depopulate" the world and make everyone their slaves. Preposterous. Scary, but, in my opinion...really preposterous.
Demonization of humanitarianism is what sticks in my craw.
We need to make the world a place where no matter WHERE a child is born, they will be fed, educated, sheltered, have adequate access to health care, clean water, clean air, clothing, and security. EVERYWHERE, for EVERYONE.
By the way, it was I who starred your two posts above.
edit on 12-6-2013 by wildtimes because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by logical7
Originally posted by mindlessbrainpower89
reply to post by logical7
yes we all know christianity is so peaceful except that the western leaders attacking the muslim countries are actually christians but lets not consider that because they are not doing it because of their beliefs, they are waging a "war on terror"!!
The innocents dying in carpet bombings and drone attacks must thank them for hunting down terrorists and just die with gratitude on their faces knowing that they are just acceptable collateral damages.
Quit it with these moronic generalizations. Be more specific. Yes, I understand there are some unintelligent Christians who just follow everything the media says but, rest the blame on those individuals who do so, not the ENTIRE religion or on an ENTIRE country. Let me say this too. Everyone here is susceptible to what ever their news tells them. Therefore, this is none of anyones fault this argument rages on. The only thing that is contributing to war is misrepresentation, ignorance, mass deception, and the NWO. Oh, and all the secret societies.edit on 12-6-2013 by mindlessbrainpower89 because: (no reason given)
this was my reply to another poster, maybe you "misintepretated" it as my stand. Its not. Its more of a mock or sarcasm to get the message across as to how generalisation (as you right said) appears moronic!
I am sorry for being dense, but as to a solid purpose of this thread as it is now (as opposed to how it may have started), I am still in the dark. But as far as it goes personally, with me understanding your motivations and where you are coming from, I'm glad this confusion has been cleared up.
If you knew about their entire agenda, it would make you sick to your stomach..... I wrote this like 14 hours ago and know I don't even know what I was gonna say. I guess this will do it.
You pick any issue I've raised, which you believe has been thoroughly answered. Let's do this for as many issues as you want, but one at a time, please. I'm sure I'll agree with you on something and we can build a base of understanding from there. OK?
i think you should ask anything that you want to know and i will try to answer you.
I can understand the fear that people may have about islam, it seems that many actually want the fear to be true and that does not make sense.