John Moore Nibiru updates - can you afford to ignore this?

Originally posted by Ophiuchus 13

Originally posted by Pardon?
reply to post by Ophiuchus 13

 

Can I answer that please?

NO

W*ow.
You're a real character you are.





(Unlike those Annanuki...)

Originally posted by Pardon?

Originally posted by Ophiuchus 13

Originally posted by Pardon?
reply to post by Ophiuchus 13

 

Can I answer that please?

NO

W*ow.
You're a real character you are.





(Unlike those Annanuki...)

Thanks but I was just answering you I still LOVE THE ANNUNAKI

reply to post by Ophiuchus 13


Already answered.

Please see previous posts.

reply to post by Ophiuchus 13


Already answered.

Please see previous posts.

Originally posted by stereologist
reply to post by Ophiuchus 13

 

Already answered.

Please see previous posts.

SO YOUR ANSWER IS NO YOU DO NOT BELIEVE THE ANNUNAKI VISITED EA*RTH. THANKS FOR SHARING I WISH I COULD SEE WHERE YOU ANSWERED THE QUESTION IN DIRECT YES OR NO FASHION w/o dancing around the answer. But its cool in your heart you know they werehere before. You just dont want to own up as to how they got here for it shatteres your profile look and you cannot have that happen. You know the real deal though so I am cool with that and how many profiles do you have I wonder???

Anyone else got some examples of John Moore being a whack job?

He is pretty humorous when you take a simple look at his claims.

reply to post by eriktheawful


Hey you, thanks again for always helping me try to sort things out! Lol

Ok... So i hear what you are saying, even understand what you are saying.

Do me a favor though, check this out to understand where im coming from. This link will explain in detail where I got this idea from. Im trying to educate myself without a biased approach. Whether a binary compainion exists or not, I do think its highly possible.
www.binaryresearchinstitute.org...

In summary, beyond direct detection – one way to determine if we are in a binary or multiple star system is to see if the Sun is curving through space. To us on Earth that means we should experience a gradual “changing orientation to inertial space.” Such a phenomenon is observed as the precession of the equinox.

And please read all of it if you would.... Im appreciative of your time. :-)

The current explanation for why we see this precession of the equinox is that the tug of the Sun and the Moon acting upon the Earth’s bulge (

If the Elenin debacle taught me anything, it's that trying to reason with Nibiru believers is like continually banging your head against a wall; painful, ridiculous and utterly pointless. All the facts in the world are not going to change their blinkered point of view. There will always be another excuse, always another reason why it can't be detected or hasn't arrived. I have a certain degree of admiration for the people on this thread who stick at it and try to educate, but can't help feeling that you're just completely wasting your time.

prf swtc. I just hope for the best for all the souls of EA*RTH when its time to be evaluated.

NAMASTE*******

as far as those artificial cosmics hmm those who are supposed to know, know even if the lowers below them do not. Cant be mad @ the lowers ranks for not being told the full truth you just bare with them and hope they SEE eventually. GOOD LUCK and I mean it for it must be hard. With that good thread OP

Here is what is coming. Plain and simple. It can only be viewed in infrared. This object is huge and there is nothing like it anywhere on Google Sky. ~$heopleNation

Nibiru on Google Sky

reply to post by SheopleNation


And thus my point has been proven.

reply to post by SheopleNation

Here is what is coming. Plain and simple. It can only be viewed in infrared. This object is huge and there is nothing like it anywhere on Google Sky. ~$heopleNation

You've provided a link to CW Leonis? How quaint. Thanks for the blast from the past.

en.wikipedia.org...

lol sorry mods

reply to post by MamaJ


Good article!

I'm very aware of the Binary Companion Theory, and is one of the reasons we have had several mapping satellites since 1983 go up and look for a companion (among many other things).

The problem is: out of all the missions we have sent up, with WISE being the latest, none of them have come back with any data supporting a companion (at least one we can detect, if it were a very small Neutron Star, it would be SCREAMING in the radio band range, and if it was a Black Hole, it would have to have absolutely NO matter anywhere near it, to avoid having an accreation disk or emitting any X-Rays).

So far nothing glaringly obvious has been observed, but people are still look.

However.......even if the sun does have a companion, it does not change the fact that we can't have a heavy mass object of any kind come whipping in to our inner solar system without drastically changing the orbits of our planets (for the worst each time it passes. Each pass the eccentricities in their orbits would get worse and worse, until planets start being flung out of our solar system).

If the sun did have a heavy mass dark companion, it's gravity would be high enough that the planets around it would stay firmly around it. Any other objects around it or the sun that have extreme eccentricities ( like the dwarf planet 90377 Sedna) their orbits bring them no closer than 75 AU's from the sun. That is way out past Pluto, and is NO threat to us or the inner solar system.

I'm right up there with others and say: We don't know everything, and we have not observed everything.

But we are smart enough and have figured out enough physics and astrophysics to understand Orbital Mechanics. If we have not, there is no way we could put satellites in the skies, or send robotic probes (Voyager 1, 2, Cassini, Mars Rovers, etc, etc) out there and have them get to where they are suppose to go, and use other planets as gravity assists).

Meaning that knowing how the planets orbit the sun, we know that there is no way a heavy mass object could be coming into our inner solar system every 3600 years, as it would change the orbits of the inner planets in drastic ways that would be very noticible to anyone that watches the skies.. And no, it wouldn't just increase the earth's year by a few days, etc. heh.

Originally posted by longlostbrother
reply to post by PlanetXisHERE

 

seriously, does bibliotecapleyades have any undebunked info at all?

Yes, its called the footer information that contains the copyright, can't debunk that.

Yet, at least.

-saige-

Originally posted by oxbow
reply to post by SheopleNation

 

And thus my point has been proven.

How can you say that your point has been proven when you never had one to begin with? You're talking about a comet when the discussion is about a possible planet or dwarf star ect?

If you just want to throw out some mindless drivel in order to make yourself feel like you validated the point that you never even made to begin with then knock yourself out. Just don't expect the rest of us to accept your delusional assumptions. ~$heopleNation

reply to post by oxbow


That's not fair. Dealing with Nibiruphiles is much more painful and pointless than banging your head against the wall. At least when you bang your head against a wall if you do it hard enough and long enough you'll eventually break through to the other side. At the very least you'll knock yourself out and when you come to you'll have forgotten the experience of hitting your head against the wall.

reply to post by SheopleNation


You proved his point by showing that Nibiruphiles never listen to facts. They have been claiming that CW Leonis is Nibiru for years now. Every time this claim comes up they're corrected. Yet, as you have so graciously demonstrated, they will continue to try to make CW Leonis Nibiru regardless of facts.