It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by amcpwoy
reply to post by DJW001
You're a very stubborn debunker, who borders and in this case appears to engage pseudosceptic traits.
Click those links
translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=ru&tl=en&u=http://www.spsl.nsc.ru/~m1-way/dmitrv.htm
tinyurl.com/ced82w7
nsc.ru is an official Russian state institute website.
spsl.nsc.ru is the Siberian branch library website.
uiggm.nsc.ru is the United Institute of Geology, Geophysics and Mineralogy SB RAS websiteedit on 26-7-2012 by amcpwoy because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by PlanetXisHERE
Originally posted by welshreduk
I often hear how "Nibiru" means "crossing" or "point of transition" so could it be that the word Nibiru was taken out of context and actually simply means the Earth/Solar System "crossing" or " transitioning" the galactic plane or something like that rather than referring to a planet?
Here is a crop circle depicting one of the most ancient symbols known to mankind, the Yin-Yang symbol famous from the I-Ching. Do you think it could also represent the relationship earth has with another solar body?
The State Public Scientific Technological Library of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Алексей Николаевич Дмитриев
Originally posted by Pardon?
Come on people, enough is enough.
Nibiru may exist, maybe in another dimension but certainly not in this one < removes tongue from cheek >.
Seriously though, being an amateur astronomer of nearly 40 years who's travelled all over the world to look at the skies, I can categorically state I have seen no evidence either visually or via radio-telescopy of this mythical celestial body.
An earlier poster pointed out that Nibiru's light is in the infra-red frequency which somehow renders it almost invisible. Absolute nonsense. It is so easy to convert a standard telescope into infra-red using even a very basic digital sensor. The difficult part is keeping the housing of the scope cool but in winter, certainly in the UK, that's not much of a problem. And in the Antarctic, where some fervent Nibiru supporters believe it can ONLY be seen, the conditions are perfect for infra-red telescopy.
I know it's difficult for people to admit they're wrong especially those who follow the likes of Sitchin but the best thing to do is either admit defeat or turn your interests to something more productive as there in NO EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER to support your claims. Nothing.
On the subject of Sitchin, he made an awful lot of money on the back of his falsehoods, his deliberate misinterpretations and his twisting of the "facts" capitalising on the gullibility of "new-agers". The same goes for Von Daniken, Icke, Temple etc etc.
Charlatans to a man.
Well, I've never heard anyone call Jupiter a star, but just going off the top of my head as I'm on the run and too busy to look this up, but aren't they discovering smaller quasi-planetary bodies out past pluto all the time? Also, aren't the voyagers only now reaching the edge of the solar system, and they've been past Pluto for how many years? I don't know how much stock people put into this guy, he had many threads on here, but hasn't John Lear said there are more than 50 planets in our solar system?
This in no way invalidates or make disappear the official biography hosted at The State Public Scientific Technological Library of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences .
Feel free to ignore any you feel have psuedosceptic traits, sociopathic traits etc.
Originally posted by Chamberf=6
Originally posted by PlanetXisHERE
Originally posted by Phage
Jupiter only "gives off" light in infrared. So does Saturn, Mars, and Venus. We can see them because they reflect the visible light of the Sun.
But Nibiru doesn't give off light in infrared, nor does it reflect the light of the Sun. Nibiru does not exist.
So no objects in the universe absorb reflected light?
So you are saying it both absorbs and reflects light?
How can that be?
Oh, that's right, it can't.edit on 7/25/2012 by Chamberf=6 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by caf1550
reply to post by Ophiuchus 13
Which are also tiny moons but they still found them, "Nibiru" is suppose to be 3-4 times the size of Jupiter
Originally posted by stereologist
reply to post by Ophiuchus 13
If the Moon were pure osmium it would not have that mass.
Must it be a known EA*RTH mineral what the DYSON SPHERE is made of??? I mean the crafts are said to traverse the Universe and it doesnt have to be the exact size of LUNA I was using that as an example