It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
But you don't need NASA to settle this for you (whether you trust them or not). There are many other space agencies not to mention literally millions of astronomers (both professional and amateur).
Originally posted by PlanetXisHERE
Originally posted by Dizrael
im not defending either side really, the only FACT we have is
we dont know.
we dont know if it exists
we dont know (if it does) whats its composition is
we dont know (if it does) where it is, or if it will even come close to us, "this time" assuming it has in the past (3600 years ago)
deny ignorance, if we dont the facts, how can you make even an educated guess, one way or the other.
That is the problem. The one agency that could definitely settle this for us, NASA, can't be trusted, and is primarily an arm of the security apparatus.
Look, in a video in this article (the second video), we have TWO NASA officials talking about going BACK to Mars, they are obviously referring to manned missions since there are currently so many unmanned ones on the go and planned. How can you trust such people at all?
www.apparentlyapparel.com...
Originally posted by stereologist
reply to post by Ophiuchus 13
I have a thread on why people think that weather is affected by other planets. Care to explain why you think there is a link between ice melting and an unknown planet?
www.abovetopsecret.com...
Originally posted by PlanetXisHERE
Originally posted by dontlaughthink
reply to post by PlanetXisHERE
Have you or anyone else noticed what John Moore said, ??????
He said earth is 24,000 miles in diameter, it's not it's only 7,000 miles diameter.
If nibiru exists, and it's only going to be 5 to 10 times the diameter of earth away from earth,10x diameter = 70,000 miles away, that would be goodbye earth.
The earth is 24,000 miles around the circumference.
Have a nice day.edit on 26-7-2012 by dontlaughthink because: (no reason given)
Yes, I realize he was off in the earth diameter numbers.
However, the numbers I have heard for the closest distance of Nibiru's pass to earth are on the order of 10 millions plus miles.
SO you call the existence of the ANNUNAKI (on EA*RTH) a LIE then. THANKS
Originally posted by stereologist
reply to post by Ophiuchus 13
SO you call the existence of the ANNUNAKI (on EA*RTH) a LIE then. THANKS
That's is not what I wrote is it?
Originally posted by viking43
Originally posted by DJW001
reply to post by Ophiuchus 13
I was not GIVEN the RETURN DATE ITS A SUPRISE
So is Moore lying when he says it will be returning in just a few weeks?
When will it be here and why no drastic effects yet ??
"Like a thief in the night" just saying
Originally posted by stereologist
reply to post by Ophiuchus 13
So you post a statement about Greenland ice and you know that it is a lie to claim it is due to an unknown planet. Not surprised at all.
DANCE around it huh, just answer very simple DID THE ANNUNAKI VISIT EA*RTH? QUESTION 1, IF YOU DONT ANSWER YOU VALIDATE A NIBIRUS 3 CRAFT OK...
Originally posted by stereologist
reply to post by Ophiuchus 13
DANCE around it huh, just answer very simple DID THE ANNUNAKI VISIT EA*RTH? QUESTION 1, IF YOU DONT ANSWER YOU VALIDATE A NIBIRUS 3 CRAFT OK...
That is as illogical as everything else you have posted in this thread.
The claims of Annunaki other than what the ancients wrote is hogwash made up by charlatans like Sitchin and Von Daniken. It is gibberish for the gullible.
post above to look @ the Greenland Ice sheet??? I NEVER SAID IT WAS THE CAUSE I REFERENCED CHANGES TO EA*RTH YOU LIE NOT ME?
When will it be here and why no drastic effects yet ??
"Like a thief in the night" just saying
Like Greenalnd losing so much ice in 4 days smh
No no no no. Time is a man-made idea used to explain the changes that are perceived from point a to point b.
Originally posted by PlanetXisHERE
reply to post by eriktheawful
If they had to "add" five days at the end of the year it was obviously 5 days shorter than the current year. Just Google Egyptian calendar 360 days and see what you come up with.
Originally posted by stereologist
reply to post by Ophiuchus 13
post above to look @ the Greenland Ice sheet??? I NEVER SAID IT WAS THE CAUSE I REFERENCED CHANGES TO EA*RTH YOU LIE NOT ME?
Seems that you lie.
Viking43 wrote
When will it be here and why no drastic effects yet ??
"Like a thief in the night" just saying
Your response
Like Greenalnd losing so much ice in 4 days smh
See you lied.
Originally posted by MamaJ
Not sure about Nibiru or Planet X or Nemesis.... But what I am sure of is this.....
There could be scenarios that are in fact..... Plausible in my mind.
Within the oort cloud there are possibilites.... Many to be exact.
Comets being flung, planets being flung, and so on into our " system" that we cannot see.
We may not be able to see anything dark that does not radiate until it comes into our sight with the light we have available. Some bodies just do not emit light, like a brown dwarf. It may not be heated, but rather cold.
Could we not have a companion star to our sun that is dark? Yes... I believe we can.
In my opinion if there is anything of importance that may affect the earth it will either come from the oort cloud or behind our sun.
We may not be able to see anything dark that does not radiate until it comes into our sight with the light we have available. Some bodies just do not emit light, like a brown dwarf. It may not be heated, but rather cold.
Could we not have a companion star to our sun that is dark? Yes... I believe we can.
Originally posted by eriktheawful
Originally posted by MamaJ
Not sure about Nibiru or Planet X or Nemesis.... But what I am sure of is this.....
There could be scenarios that are in fact..... Plausible in my mind.
Within the oort cloud there are possibilites.... Many to be exact.
Comets being flung, planets being flung, and so on into our " system" that we cannot see.
We may not be able to see anything dark that does not radiate until it comes into our sight with the light we have available. Some bodies just do not emit light, like a brown dwarf. It may not be heated, but rather cold.
Could we not have a companion star to our sun that is dark? Yes... I believe we can.
In my opinion if there is anything of importance that may affect the earth it will either come from the oort cloud or behind our sun.
I've run simulations on this too. If there is any star be it dark or not, within 1 light year of our sun, it tugs on our sun quite a bit and makes it wobble quite a lot.
Our sun doesn't do that.
However, let us talk about this "behind the sun".
Exactly what do people mean when they say "behind the sun"? You all do realize that we orbit the sun.......we get to see all around it, all 360 degrees?
Before anyone says: well it's in orbit around the sun and orbits so that it stays behind the sun, please look again at my simulation of that, it would be a disaster for all the planets in the solar system:
Originally posted by Pardon?
reply to post by Ophiuchus 13
No, the Annunaki did not visit Earth (and why on earth (no pun) are you putting an asterisk inbetween the A and R or Earth? Are you trying to give us some sort of impression of who you think you are? It's certainly giving me an impression of you...).
They are mythical gods which were invented by man then hijacked by a charlatan. No more, no less.