It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by CJCrawley
As far as I'm aware, there is no scientific proof that taking mega doses of any vitamin confers increased health - with the possible exception of vitamin B3 vis-a-vis cholesterol.
Large doses of Vit C seem to reduce cold symptoms in those who have a cold, but does not prevent colds. Nor does it prevent or treat cancer.
All this was started by Linus Pauling in the early 70s and is now dismissed by most of the scientific community as quackery.
Originally posted by CJCrawley
reply to post by dominicus
So basically you are carrying out a chemical experiment on yourself without any scientific verification as to the benefits or drawbacks.
Bravo.
Originally posted by Destinyone
reply to post by CJCrawley
I don't care what the scientific community says. I do know, since taking Lipo-C for about a year now. While all those not taking it around me, had the flue, colds, and allergies this past year. I. Did. Not. Not one single ailment.
Plus, my energy levels and stamina have shot up in direct proportion to the amount I've taken. Joint pain and swelling are almost unheard of now. Hair and nails growing thicker and healthier now. Skin healthy, glowing and more pliable.
This is coming from a 62 year old Woman, who feels like she's 40 again. So there, stuff that in your scientific journal and hack your way through another cold season...
Des
Originally posted by CJCrawley
reply to post by dominicus
So basically you are carrying out a chemical experiment on yourself without any scientific verification as to the benefits or drawbacks.
Bravo.
Alan pulled out of his coma from white-out pneumonia (lungs whited out in X-rays) and complications with leukemia. He had been on life support, and doctors were threatening to turn it off and let him die when his family intervened. They went through a series of sagas and legal hassles to get the hospital to administer IV C.
The doctors complied at first, and there was enough improvement to convince the hospital staff not to pull the plug on his life support as they had threatened. But the hospital felt they knew better and stopped the IV C. Alan's condition worsened. After legal intervention, they continued at only two grams IV C daily instead of the 50 grams daily before. Alan's condition went into a critical limbo.
Alan Smith only began to improve after taking Lypo-Spheric packets. You can view the first segment of the 60 Minutes Alan Smiths story here (www.3news.co.nz...). Learn more:
Originally posted by CJCrawley
As far as I'm aware, there is no scientific proof that taking mega doses of any vitamin confers increased health - with the possible exception of vitamin B3 vis-a-vis cholesterol.
Large doses of Vit C seem to reduce cold symptoms in those who have a cold, but does not prevent colds. Nor does it prevent or treat cancer.
All this was started by Linus Pauling in the early 70s and is now dismissed by most of the scientific community as quackery.
There are more than 50,000 dietary supplements available and they are consumed by about half the U.S. adult population. These products are not intended to prevent or treat any disease and in some circumstances are dangerous, according to the U.S. National Institutes of Health. For those who fail to consume a balanced diet, the agency says that certain supplements "may have value." [1] Effects of most of these products have not been determined in randomized clinical trials and manufacturing is lightly regulated; randomized clinical trials of certain vitamins and antioxidants have found increased mortality rates.[2][3]
Originally posted by CJCrawley
There are more than 50,000 dietary supplements available and they are consumed by about half the U.S. adult population. These products are not intended to prevent or treat any disease and in some circumstances are dangerous, according to the U.S. National Institutes of Health. For those who fail to consume a balanced diet, the agency says that certain supplements "may have value." [1] Effects of most of these products have not been determined in randomized clinical trials and manufacturing is lightly regulated; randomized clinical trials of certain vitamins and antioxidants have found increased mortality rates.[2][3]
en.wikipedia.org...
Hmm. Ya.
The National Institutes of Health (NIH) is actually the second-highest funding source for drug studies (first is the drug companies, themselves). Many assume NIH-funded studies are unbiased, but NIH accepts a great deal of money from Big Pharma and is deeply enmeshed with the industry,
The revolving door between government and the pharmaceutical industry had barely stopped spinning from January 2011, when Elias Zerhouni, former director of the NIH — one of the world's foremost medical research centers, and an agency of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services — became the president of Sanofi-Aventis' research labs.
Originally posted by CJCrawley
reply to post by dominicus
Look, this is my point in a nutshell.
You may be right about vitamin C, I don't know.
But you don't know either.
No one knows.
Vitamin C is essential for health. No one is denying that.
So taking more of it means you become healthier, right?
And taking mega amounts means you become mega healthy, yes!
Well, no. Life doesn't quite work like that. Would that it were so simple.
I'm fairly sure the 80mg a day RDA is a bare minimum amount needed to avoid scurvy. I'll give you that.
People should be taking more in their diets. Fair enough.
But how much more? And in what form?
For some reason these chemicals seem to be better tolerated by our bodies in their natural state, as they occur in food, rather than in tablet form.
But you're not getting it from food, and you're taking vastly more of it than is possible in even the healthiest of diets.
And you don't know the long-term consequences of that...which could be harmful or even fatal (at least one person has died after developing kidney stones following a kidney transplant).
You are playing Russian roulette with your life/health, which is inexplicable.
How many pharmacologists and doctors do you suppose are on mega-vitamin regimens?
Not many, because they'd all be writing about how wonderful it was!
They're not doing it because they aren't prepared to become lab rats.
Sooo....why would you?
Oh, and some of the big pharmaceutical companies are behind a lot of the products you find in the health stores.
Names like Pfizer and Bayer.
Did you think they were hand-made by kindly monks who just wanted to make you healthy?
Originally posted by dominicus
reply to post by RedCairo
Completely agreed, but the thing is, this is ATS, where the majority of folks question the status quo, gov, mil, fda, usda, science agendas, medical industry, etc.
So its really odd to me to have somebody so for pro-status quo to be posting on this thread in the first place.
Oh well, let em all get sick if they want, having to pay the co-pays, the prescription fees, and having to rely on what a scientist/doc/big pharma tells them to do, while those of us here, who take Lipo-C, continue to maintain perfect health year round. Cheers to another 3 oz. Shot glass of Lipo-C!!!!!!