It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Anon009
Gentlemen,
I believe Charlie Chaplin stated it best, regarding human nature and the progress of mankind. Ironically his first ever speaking role.
www.youtube.com...edit on 17-3-2012 by Anon009 because: (no reason given)
2112
Main article: 2112 (song)
In the year 2062, a galaxy-wide war results in the union of all planets under the rule of the Red Star of the Solar Federation. By 2112, the world is controlled by the "Priests of the Temples of Syrinx," who determine the content of all reading matter, songs, pictures - every facet of life. A man discovers an ancient guitar and learns to play his own music. Thinking he has made a wonderful discovery that will be a boon to humanity, he goes to present the guitar to the priests of the Temples, who angrily destroy it and rebuke him for unearthing one of the "silly whims" that caused the collapse of the previous civilization. He goes into hiding and dreams of a world before the Solar Federation. Upon awakening he becomes distraught and commits suicide. As he dies, another planetary battle begins resulting in the ambiguous ending "Attention all planets of the Solar Federation: We have assumed control." (This spoken section was created by Geddy Lee and Alex Lifeson reportedly "messing around with a tape recorder.") On the album, Neil Peart credits "the genus of Ayn Rand." Rand, a Russian-born Jewish-American novelist and creator of the philosophy of Objectivism, wrote a novella titled Anthem (itself adopted as the title of another Rush song, from the album Fly By Night) from which Peart borrowed the broad strokes of the plot.
Originally posted by libertytoall
Anarchy would be the best way if all people on earth were civilized non violent people. Unfortunately that isn't the case..
Originally posted by AwakeinNM
Originally posted by FugitiveSoul
The only way a one-world government could work is if we rid ourselves of organized religion. Of course, we would have to prove to people that their religions were fallacies or we would have to kill anyone who couldn’t conform their beliefs and learn to play ball.
Yep, good idea, Hitler.
First you'd have to prove that religion is a fallacy. Good luck with that.
Oh... let me guess what your comeback is going to be:
"Prove that it isn't a fallacy."
So predictable.
Originally posted by EarthCitizen23
Originally posted by AwakeinNM
Originally posted by EarthCitizen23
Originally posted by AwakeinNM
Originally posted by AdamsMurmur
reply to post by AwakeinNM
Your idea of reality is the real illusion here because it's the one they set up for you. Your kind of thinking and ideas are some examples of what's holding the human race back.
I'd love it if everyone thought like you, I really would, and I espouse the ideals that you would like to see become reality, whether you believe me or not. But there's what you WISH for, and there's what you HAVE. I suggest you deal with what we have right now.
OK,, now we are getting somewhere,,, I would like to hear how you 'espouse the ideals'.
I believe that even though here on these forums, we may misunderstand each other,, I also believe in hearing one out,, so again I request you elaborate on this because we seem to be at odds, but I strangely feel that in reality we think more alike than you might suggest.
NO GOVERNMENT is the Ideal in my mind. And I too am a staunch Individualist.
But I also believe that quote I have as my signature.
BE THE CHANGE YOU WISH TO SEE IN THE WORLD,,,
so in that mood,,, I believe our similarities are more than our differences.. Our Semantics mess us ALL up MOST of the time.
You'd be getting somewhere if you quoted the WHOLE post rather than cherry pick the parts you like.
To make you Happy Kind Sir/ or Madam,
I thought I was being nothing more than to the point. The Point being, as evidence shows with your reply. You don't wish to discuss anything, or give an alternative to what the OP suggest. Rather, you must be what is called a Troll here at ATS, only interested in Tearing down, and making snide remarks.
I was being polite and trying to connect with what I see as our similarities, but you insist on Division. Thus the world is as it is now, because of selfish Individuals as yourself.
Again, I ask,
How do you Espouse the Ideals that the OP is speaking of in this thread, you yourself said that, not me.
Why is it you avoid giving an alternative approach that can be discussed openly on this forum?
Also, I thought you were tired of this fantasy and had left the Thread, too bad you stayed because I see that you have no desire to communicate, you just wish to say something biting and witty to offend those who think differently than yourself. I respectfully requested some dialog, yet again you failed to respond intelligently.
Can you respond differently or is all you know is Attack Attack Attack?
Peace to you my friend, I see your having issues with being human, I understand your frustration.
Learning to communicate would help you immensely.
That means, speaking to someone the way you would wish to be spoken to,,
you are missing the boat because of your love of division and antics that only give you any gratification.
Originally posted by FugitiveSoul
Originally posted by AwakeinNM
Originally posted by FugitiveSoul
The only way a one-world government could work is if we rid ourselves of organized religion. Of course, we would have to prove to people that their religions were fallacies or we would have to kill anyone who couldn’t conform their beliefs and learn to play ball.
Yep, good idea, Hitler.
First you'd have to prove that religion is a fallacy. Good luck with that.
Oh... let me guess what your comeback is going to be:
"Prove that it isn't a fallacy."
So predictable.
You're obviously anti-change/pro-status quo, that is clear...
edit on 17-3-2012 by FugitiveSoul because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Factjunkie
Look at the facts. They are going to make us have a one world government if we like it or not.
Originally posted by AwakeinNM
WRONG WRONG WRONG again. Stop making assumptions about my position, you and all the others.
Originally posted by overclockedpc
reply to post by ThirdEyeofHorus
I don't want to give the impression that I'm some ignorant hippie that thinks one move is going to make everything ok. I just think if we as a world could let go of some of the secrecy without sacrificing security we might progress. I'm truthfully not that optimistic about a One World Nation. There would have to be a lot of compromise. I don't think we're ready for that yet. Not by a long shot.
.......We need a one world government where laws would apply to every citizen of the world, and where a person living in Canada has the same rights as a mother living in the poorest country in Africa. ......
What's wrong with south America.
Originally posted by metodex
I love how this thread is about one world government and you all focus on America.
Originally posted by FugitiveSoul
You cannot deny that religion, which by design, divides people, and stunts human growth, must go the way of the rest of the archaic notions that the world has let go of in the name of moving forward.
Originally posted by FugitiveSoul
The only way a one-world government could work is if we rid ourselves of organized religion. Of course, we would have to prove to people that their religions were fallacies or we would have to kill anyone who couldn’t conform their beliefs and learn to play ball.
...