It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
So many people here giving their "personal opinions" on the matter, and seemingly clueless from the Christian point of view
I got a question for you...Why do you care? Let people live however the hell they want, they don't have to explain a damn thing to anybody
Originally posted by seedofchucky
reply to post by theRhenn
So many people here giving their "personal opinions" on the matter, and seemingly clueless from the Christian point of view
A christian point of view ? do you know how many christian sects there are ?
christians also give their personal opinions. Christians today are not united , they have so many problems within. They can't even figure out who the god of the bible is, who jesus is , what authority paul has etc.
asking a christian who is already clueless is just like asking a non christian . Only difference is the non christian will give you an outside of box opinion
information that's blindly given from someone who doesnt know anything about it, but more or less giving "what they've heard" as I can see. why not just get it from the horses mouth in which it was requested?
That's like asking a Jew how to practice being a catholic
reply to post by micmerci
I think that there is a great number of Christians (myself included) who believe from scripture that we are no longer under the authority of the law. Since Christ came He fulfilled the law and now we are under grace. Grace is the unmerited favor of God. We did not earn it. Jesus earned it for us. That is the reason we cut our hair, eat pork, etc. We are no longer bound by these laws- all of them. So there is no need for picking and choosing for those of this belief system. Why do some Christians say homosexuality is a sin and yet work on Sabbath? Well, technically both of those are sins according to the law. But two things happen here in the minds of some Christians- 1. They put weight on to certain sins, making one worse than another. According to scripture God does not see it this way. Sin is sin. And, 2. they forget where they came from...if we are living under grace that means grace for all believers, even the ones who struggle with issues that you may not struggle with. Overeating and swearing are sins, so why aren't people condemning those who do that? Is it because one is more socially acceptable than another? That is wrong thinking. God doesn't think like that. Christians need to demonstrate the love of God and not condemn others. That is how the message of God will be spread.
The New Testament gives two basic answers to this question: Yes, and no. Some verses indicate continuity, and others indicate change. Some verses maintain the validity of the law; others describe it as having been superseded by Christ.
If we look at one group of verses, we might conclude that we have to keep all OT (Old Testament) laws. If we look at another group of verses, we might conclude that they are all done away. Both answers have scriptural support and validity, so we need to look at both sides of the question
Originally posted by IgnorantSpecies
reply to post by schadenfreude
Even if Jesus was legitimate I still think its weird to ignore God.
100 False Bible Prophecies
I think when you look at it from a fair perspective there is just as much reason to think Jesus is not legitimate, as there is to think that he is. Because when it comes down to it, everything religion says about the bible is opinion based on a percieved message from the book, which makes it fairly susceptible to confusion and misunderstanding.
The first prophecy which the Collins construes to be false is contained in Matthew 12:40, where Jesus is recorded as saying: "For as Jonas was three days and three nights in the whale's belly; so shall the Son of man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth." Collins devotes a mere half page to the presentation of his commentary on this verse, regarding the prophecy as false on the grounds that only two literal "nights" passed, and not three, while the body of Jesus lay in the sepulcher. But at no point does he so much as quote from, much less address, the conclusions of scholarly commentators on the passage. He wishes to be regarded as a "freethinker." Very well. But if his thinking is "free," it is certainly not thorough, as any thorough examination of a passage in scripture would address the commentaries given of it by scholarly authorities. This Collins utterly neglects to do in the case of the above text. Had he taken sufficient pains to consult, for instance, Barnes' Notes on the Bible respecting Matthew 12:40, he would have learned that the computation of "three days and three nights" was quite in order. As Barnes observes: "This computation is, however, strictly in accordance with the Jewish mode of reckoning. If it had not been, the Jews would have understood it, and would have charged our Saviour as being a false prophet, for it was well known to them that he had spoken this prophecy, Matthew 27:63. Such a charge, however, was never made; and it is plain, therefore, that what was meant by the prediction was accomplished. It was a maxim, also, among the Jews, in computing time, that a part of a day was to be received as the whole. Many instances of this kind occur in both sacred and profane history. See 2 Chronicles 10:5, 2 Chronicles 10:12; Genesis 42:17-18. Compare Esther 4:16 with Esther 5:1." Gill's Exposition of the Entire Bible also has much to say on the matter, but readers of Collins' book would never be made aware of the fact.
Jesus IS Lord, and your "proofs" are a joke
There are no contradictions.
Do you know why they stop killing Christians i Rome? It's b/c the Christians faced death willingly
Originally posted by seedofchucky
reply to post by theRhenn
we know what its like being a christian .
dillusional , self centered , ignnorant , double standards , do as i say not as i do mentality . Thats no secret.
when you say christian , i see many branches of ignorance who can't even unite with each other. Christians all have their own version of reality and cherry picked verses .
So, from my point of view, you are just as narrowminded as the people you describe as christians, when in truth, you obviously dont know what christians are
The OP is right to question these things because even Christians see this about other Christians, were as you, and people like you, tend to ball them up in one bunch.
no contradictions, completely scientific, eternal, completely inerrant
animals talk, zombies walk, golems and sorcery. vampires, talking trees, disobedient trees, breed sheep in front of striped posts to get striped sheep
oh and that 'god is a man of war' thing?
who was it god couldn't defeat because they had chariots of iron? judges 1.19
What makes a person a christian or not is not that complicated
Ephesians notes that this salvation is a gift from God and cannot be EARNED
What makes someone not a Christian is the following: Not being born again. Attempts to earn salvation by 1. Going to church on sunday 2. Being bapized, 3. putting money in the offering, 4. Trying to be a "good person", 5. Helping little old women cross the street,6. Giving to charity etc etc etc...........
The quotation from the Gospel of John has raised some questions about the meaning and authenticity of the phrase "born again". In the chapter, Nicodemus is puzzled and asks Jesus what he means by saying that "Ye must be born again". He questions: "How can a man re-enter his mother's womb?" Bart D. Ehrman says that this confusion is because in Greek (the language of the gospel) the word again is ambiguous. It might mean again or a second time or from above, which would explain Nicodemus' confusion. However, the Jews at Jesus' time were actually speaking Aramaic, in which language there would not have been a double meaning. Ehrman says that this raises questions about the authenticity of the dialogue, the meaning of the words, and, therefore, the use of the phrase.[28]
A 19th century source notes that the phrase was not mentioned by the other Gospellers, nor by the Apostles except Peter. "It was not regarded by any of the Evangelists but John of sufficient importance to record." And, without John, "we should hardly have known that it was necessary for one to be born again." This suggests that "the text and context was meant to apply to Nicodemus particularly, and not to the world." Otherwise, it would have been mentioned more often
A christian is someone who is born again.......
Originally posted by seedofchucky
reply to post by schadenfreude
no contradictions, completely scientific, eternal, completely inerrant
animals talk, zombies walk, golems and sorcery. vampires, talking trees, disobedient trees, breed sheep in front of striped posts to get striped sheep
oh and that 'god is a man of war' thing?
who was it god couldn't defeat because they had chariots of iron? judges 1.19
lol. You see when your in denial , you can rationlize any fairy tale not to be a contradiction .
I'm sure you won't even watch the videos or visit the links , but your not fooling me
Not all of these sects are as divided as you may think. Only on certain aspects, which divide them under diffrent names... Such as Baptist, Catholic, Non Denom, etc.. So, in reality, it's just as diffrent as Jews are to Christians and Muslim to Either. But asking "christians" in general pretty much encompasses all of those induvidual groups
I deny ignorance everyday. Hence my responce to you
That's like a Christian telling you what an Athiest is all about when in truth, they could tell you more about athiest than the other way around
Since, of course, Athiests are simply those that do not believe. They're not as complicated as Christian beliefs.. it's simple. Nothing..
But to understand, you have to walk that road, my fine feathered friend. Otherwise, you're just picking straws based on what you 'heard". Christians go at each other every day, because they are of diffrent cultures, names, and simple little diffrences that make them another "name" than just general "christians". It's not that complicated
I was raised in a family of Catholics (mainly), Baptists (second), Penticostals (some) and Athiests (some) and spiritualists that are trying to find their way. It's easy to pick out the ridicule, but getting tutored in math by an english teacher IS IGNORANCE, the one thing you claim to deny
This is not a personal attack on you, as it isnt..
I dont quite know where I stand since I see so many diffrent aspects and I personaly believe it takes more than the born into or the "I believe" to be a Christian. To me, a Christian is someone who DOES as Jesus said and follows it to the best of their ability, not nitpicking the parts that suits me or anyone else. It's all or nothing. Hot or Cold, not luke warm
Originally posted by Evanzsayz
reply to post by ofNight
I got a question for you...Why do you care? Let people live however the hell they want, they don't have to explain a damn thing to anybody.