It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
as hard as I tryed to see it even in the graphics in the report and live photos, I could only see where the plain got down to the point where it skipped off the tops of cars tearing roof off , I couldnt find the lawn issue either. an i cant seem to understand where my question is answered , the whole still appears to be to small for some reason. there should be more diameter to the impact point most of the out lying damages appear to be attributed to post impact exsplosion and eventual callapses post incident and are seperate from the damages I question, infact to prove why I think that look at the photos of the rebar bending and stretching in pics 5.22 , 5.23, 5.20, 5.12, the rest of the damage pictures seem post impact accoring to the report, I just cant figure why the impact hole is so small. And the comment that the designer didnt originally nor during upgrades allow for air craft impact then duh why didnt they think of it after all there is a helo landing zone , if it went out of control what did they think it was going to do kiss the building and say sorry for bumping into you , no it would have punch a whole in the buidling wouldnt it. [edit on 3/2/2005 by drbryankkruta]
Originally posted by HowardRoarkWell since the “American Civil engineering association” does not appear to exist, I am assuming that you are refereeing to the This report by the American society of civil engineers. I can’t find the reference that you are referring to, can you please show me, or tell me what page it is on? Drbryankkruta, Read the above report, it might answer some of your questions.
Originally posted by CadeThen why did the American Civil engineering association write in their building performance report that a "wide crater was ploughed into the Pentagon lawn"? Why are so many here so gun hoe on argueing but shy about informing themselves? Why is it more fun to argue for page after page then it is sitting down and watching a documentary from a skeptic? Sincerely Cade
Originally posted by HowardRoark Not necessarily. The plane came in at an extremely shallow angle and a high ate of speed. At that angle and speed, the "ground effect" would have worked to keep the plane from hitting the lawn. (I beleive that this has already been discussed somewhere in this thread)
I did read the section where they itemized the material testing and damage evaluations but it still dont seem right when compared to what I responded to with a car 100s of times lighter and slower traveling yet the porportions are so differnt. The damage is mostly secondary the actual impact damage is where the colums are missing and thpath is very close to hull width . there is one figure and explination for the exterior wall having a wider hole because of wing impact and secondary post crash damage but thats not the area I am asking about. the middle area after the wings come off is the more accurate pathway diameter as when you get to final resting place the damage only is the diameter of the nose not the whole hull. [edit on 3/2/2005 by drbryankkruta]
Originally posted by HowardRoark Try actually reading the report. It goes into extensive detail on how the impact of the plane damaged the columns and facade.
no the in between impact and punch out where the travel of the craft thru the building narrows as the wings are torn off and only the hull is traveling there it should have been wider for a craft that large at the speed of impact I was wondering was the building modified that well to avoid the damage getting worse like in the car scenario or was the air craft actually smaller than claimed.
Originally posted by HowardRoark What are you talking about, the "punch out?" Dude that was from only a small piece of the debris.
I would take it to mean you think the craft collapsed slightly there by making a smaller hole, well make some since , but this is going to nag me now wondering what if , but thanks for atleast trying to help answer my question.
Originally posted by HowardRoark Well in a contest between concrete and steel vrs. aluminum and plastic, guess which wins?
For the last video....
Originally posted by dh Maybe these videos have been posted here before If not, hope they help the argument www.gallerize.com... thewebfairy.com...
Indeo XP is available for purchase and download through our electronic store for $14.95.
The program you are trying to run requires a current Indeo codec. To obtain a current driver that is compatible with this version of Windows, please contact the manufacturer at indeo.ligos.com....
It ran alright for me without any special purchases Webfairy' stuff seems to run ok most platforms except on the most primitive go to www.webfairy.com You shouldn't need to be buying stuff The first video is the important information The second just some initial information from 9-11 from an eyewitness reporter that there was no jetliner [edit on 3-2-2005 by dh]
Originally posted by SMRFor the last video....
Originally posted by dh Maybe these videos have been posted here before If not, hope they help the argument www.gallerize.com... thewebfairy.com...Indeo XP is available for purchase and download through our electronic store for $14.95.
The program you are trying to run requires a current Indeo codec. To obtain a current driver that is compatible with this version of Windows, please contact the manufacturer at indeo.ligos.com....
I think trying to find the truth of what may have happened to those people is more of good gesture than ruining their memory.If you died by way of a conspiracy,and a different story was told,would you not wish someone(s) would help in finding the truth? This isnt a BUSH-BASH.You need to read the entire thread,or at least a few pages.That is NOT what is going on here. You ask the same question we are trying to find out.Where is the 757 if it did not hit.No matter what side your on,answers need to be found.Whether it is WHY was it allowed to happen,or WHERE are the people and plane. As for your question on Barbara Olson.Same goes for her,WHERE is she if it was not her flight that hit. Some keep saying she made a call from her cell phone.Well,that just cant happen.It has been proven that she could not have made that call from the altitude she was at with a cell phone.The time stamp that is said was compared to the flight time and they would have been to high for the cell to get any reception.I know the post is somewhere in here,just cant find it right now,but it was posted. Also,many say all passengers were identified by means of DNA.Again,cant happen.Because DNA is destroyed by high temperatures. At room and body temperatures DNA in tissue will be broken down by bacteria. DNA in bone and hair will be stable at these temperatures. As we know though,the intense fire that took place was entirely to hot for bone or hair to survive. Modern crematories burn at a temperature of 2000+ degrees Fahrenheit, with an afterburner temperature of 1600 degrees Fahrenheit. This high temperature causes the body to combust and consume itself. The fire at the Pentagon was a little over 3,000 degrees. No human body can withstand that and nothing will be left. So I want to know,just how did they do DNA testing? Back to the quote.I think the respectfull thing to do is find the truth and not let the dead/missing be remembered by a lie.
Originally posted by djohnsto77 I think you people are really sick and ruining the memories of these poor people who died in a cheap attempt to slander Bush. If a plane didn't hit the Pentagon, then what happened to the flight? What happened to Barbara Olson? You all need to get a life.
I have seen 4-5 times,someone saying how disrespectful it is to be going on like this. How disrespectful is it to let a lie go unresolved.Again,how would you feel if you were the one dead because of a govt coverup and nobody had the balls to find and expose the truth
You have voted Cade for the Way Above Top Secret award.
Indeo XP is available for purchase and download through our electronic store for $14.95. I got all that software as updates from the various vendors free I am using windows XP Office Profession SP 2 operating system with all the players I can get to work with it like quicktime and windows media etc. and I didnt pay anything , I just updated the end user software. [edit on 4/2/2005 by drbryankkruta]
The program you are trying to run requires a current Indeo codec. To obtain a current driver that is compatible with this version of Windows, please contact the manufacturer at indeo.ligos.com....