It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
reply to post by sonnny1
The Socialist Party, the Communist Party, and the Green Party are already all listed as legit political parties at the DMV. What new party could possibly represent them that isn't already in existence?
If they want a Canadian Adbusters anti-Capitalist Party, that's fine, and they can just go back to Canada and please take all the commies with them.edit on 16-11-2011 by ThirdEyeofHorus because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by TheWalkingFox
reply to post by ThirdEyeofHorus
Just for the record, there are no national communist or socialist parties. The DMV operates at a state level - your state might have one such party. it may have several. But there are no national parties of either stripe.
And the greens are funded by the republicans as a "splitter" option.
Originally posted by TheWalkingFox
i'm going to argue with hte OP - yes, OWS is left wing. Especially when youconsider that politics in our nation is currently right-wing only. The OP is just another person who's been trained by this system to fear the label of "leftist" or "liberal," to apologize for it and act like it's a bad thing.
Originally posted by sonnny1
So I take it,its coincidental that a Liberal,Left Wing President,who is in control,Has an Occupy Wall Street moment on his watch.
Lets really look at it for what it is Fox.
2 Parties that dont give a $h!t about anyone.
We need 20 million to March on Washington,and DEMAND Change.
Not Hope.
Screw YOUR FEAR CONSPIRACY NONSENSE, thats all it is FEAR. And guess what? We are just people, and we want different people running our country. Thats all!
Originally posted by CREAM
Originally posted by sonnny1
Screw YOUR FEAR CONSPIRACY NONSENSE, thats all it is FEAR. And guess what? We are just people, and we want different people running our country. Thats all!
[inappropriate video removed]edit on Tue Nov 15 2011 by DontTreadOnMe because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by TheWalkingFox
If he were a "liberal leftist," OWS would probably not be necessary - a liberal or leftist president would have been spending his time telling the Republicans - and Joe Goddamn Lieberman - to suck his chocolate salties and pushing for actual liberal or - dare I dream - leftist policies.
Originally posted by TheWalkingFox
While I don't disagree with your point here, I will tell you more groundwork needs to be done before a mass march on Washington. I know, you're used to instant gratification, living in a TV world of ten-second soundbytes, but this thing is going to take a while. You want to see change, you want to see results? Well, it's not going to happen in just a month and a half. My advice would be to stop hooting and flinging poop about Democrats and liberals, and get your ass on the street and try to help out.
You're talking about the Fed, I'm not talking about that. I'm simply talking about a loosening of regulations that began when Reagan was in office. The lack of regulations allowed risky, reckless business practices that clearly would fail in the long run and screw over millions. There is no conceivable way that regulating the big banks even less would have even remotely helped to prevent the financial collapse, in fact it would have done the exact opposite.
Learn your history. You are making the same argument that "the 99%" made in 1913 when they supported the creation of the Federal Reserve. The expansion of federal powers has only buttressed the apparatus of control for the banking/finance industry and created the infrastructure for the web of corporate power. All institutions based on central management feed and help each other. If you want to strike a blow against the banks (and corrupt politicians), support the shrinking of federal power.