It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by camaro68ss
What i think people should do is arrest this guy and bring him in. Clear?
Originally posted by Domo1
I suspect this guy probably is the culprit, but you never really know unless you hear it from an official source so lets not all jump to conclusions and freak out.
edit on 10/31/2011 by 12m8keall2c because: [video removed containing personally identifiable information]
Originally posted by CaptainInstaban
Originally posted by igor_ats
Won't the forensics be able to test the bullet and if one was fired from the Officers gun. . . we'll know for sure.
Sure it may take months for them to tell anyone, they probably won't tell anyone. But the forensics will know.
So get the victims family to petition for this information if they are being slow about it.
It should be impossible for someone to get shot by a cop and there no investigation on the bullet and having the gun tested etc.
He was alledgedly shot with a gas canister or a rubber bullet, both won´t penetrate the body, so the projectile was probably not found, and if it was, a gas canister won´t have the rifling marks from the barrel that a bullet may have.
A rubber bullet may have those, but it was probably not found.
Originally posted by CosmicEgg
They are here to PROTECT and SERVE. If they cannot do that without causing grievous harm, humiliation, and damage to those they are charged with said protection and service, then perhaps some consequences are in order. Same for anyone in a position of authority. They need to be the example of, not the exception to.
Originally posted by Djarums
Who verified this information?
How did they arrive at the conclusion that this particular officer perpetrated the act?
Was this reviewed and verified beyond any reasonable doubt?
Is there even a slight chance that the officer who's name is posted and being spread around was not the officer who perpetrated the act?
Interesting...
I keep hearing the words "rights, equality, justice" etc...
Now I see the information of a person who may or may not have done something wrong - who makes an average salary, probably has a mortgage to pay off and a family to feed - being spread around online amongst some people who are clearly not looking to send him fan mail.
Interesting...
I keep seeing people upset about the treatment of protestors and the lack of respect they are being given, and I keep seeing signs protesting the infringement of rights perpetrated by the government and law enforcement, and yet now I see the information of a person who may or may not have done something wrong, being denied a proper investigation into his alleged crime. Make no mistake, there was a crime here, but the officer is not being given his rights or a fair shake either, is he?
I guess what I'm trying to say is this:
You are either FOR equality, fairness, justice, and rights for all, or you're AGAINST it. You can not cry for rights for some and ignore rights for others or you are no better than those you protest against.
Are you seriously going to suggest a lynch mob form against this officer?