It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by josh2009s
reply to post by freakjive
Sadly this is no different then parents "forcing" religion upon their children. This should not be acceptable at such a young age when a child's mind can be so easily persuaded and swayed. I'm not saying the parents forced him to believe this, but 1+1 does equal two.
Originally posted by Evolutionsend
It allows you to be a woman, not just emulate one. Emulation is not sufficient. Being aloud to cry is a good example of something that we were not aloud to do, but can do after the change.
As far as acting how you want in public, I'm still somewhat not girly. I have no problem with it, because the change is about what's on the inside, connecting properly with what's on the outside. It never felt right to be a man, to have male genitalia, to be held to the standards that men are subject to. The best way that I can explain it, is that your entire life someone wants you to be a football player, but you want to be a cheerleader.edit on 18-10-2011 by Evolutionsend because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by DJM8507
At the very least he should wait until he is old enough to truly understand. Although I can see the dilemma, if he waits and later decides to be a woman then the damage done to his body from puberty, etc, will be much greater than if it was prevented in the first place.
Originally posted by karen61057
Me too ! Well kinda. I too thought that being a boy would be more fun. I liked being outdoors and I loved all kinds of creatures like frogs and snakes. Now, I would not trade my mascara for anything. But I still love them creatures.
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by DJM8507
At the very least he should wait until he is old enough to truly understand. Although I can see the dilemma, if he waits and later decides to be a woman then the damage done to his body from puberty, etc, will be much greater than if it was prevented in the first place.
But that's the point.
Nothing permanent is being done. Blockers just give him more time.
Originally posted by yourignoranceisbliss
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by facelift
11 years of life experience is not adequate to make this decision, . . .
Yes - actually it is old enough.
Many (probably most) transsexuals/transgenders (also gay/lesbian) are aware of their sexual identity in their primary years.
I don't think you fully understood the comment you quoted.
11 years of life is not enough experience in life to make such a big decision.
Originally posted by AGWskeptic
Physically is isn't 100% permanent, but mentally is another story. This kid is forming his core personality right now.
But that's the point. Nothing permanent is being done. Blockers just give him more time.
Originally posted by Tahnya86
reply to post by freakjive
firstly people need to understand that transgenderisim is a actual mental and biologiccal problem from the day of conception,
Originally posted by Maslo
reply to post by Annee
But that's the point. Nothing permanent is being done. Blockers just give him more time.
As long as there are no significant permanent side effects, I dont really have a problem with this. According to what I googled, such therapy is pretty safe if used just for a few years, and delayed puberty occurs even naturally with no negative effects.