It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by 3xil3
People should research a guy named Dean Karnazes
350 miles in 80 hours without stoppingedit on 21-8-2011 by 3xil3 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by RMFX1
Originally posted by 3xil3
People should research a guy named Dean Karnazes
350 miles in 80 hours without stoppingedit on 21-8-2011 by 3xil3 because: (no reason given)
Why don't you tell us about him?
Originally posted by Thestargateisreal
reply to post by ker2010
It's a fact that the fastest woman endurance runner in history pushed her body 2% harder than the fastest man. She's a better athlete than the fastest man. Maybe not faster, but better. She was about 20 minutes behind him, which is a close finish in an endurance race. Did you even read the article?
Originally posted by ElizaAshdene
Greetings!
As I understand the reason for discussing this thread, I won't stay long
Just wanted to point out that humans totally shouldn't run long distances. Regardless of gender. I suppose the argument still stands, but it's just silly (to me) to discuss something like this.
I suppose we could say we are better swimmers than some sea animals... but really, we didn't evolve to swim. We just learned to deal with what we were dealt. Same with running. A LONG time ago we ran for food (depending on the culture/tribe), but then we invented weapons and vehicles that helped us get around quicker. Thus, no need for evolution to make our bodies fit to run long distances.
You can google "running NOT meant for humans" and you'll get plenty of hits. And PLENTY of thoughts on the matter
Here is an article that pretty well describes what I'm trying to say. I even used his 'swimming' example.
I suppose I'm just hoping to point out how detrimental this kind of activity is to one's health. Ask a runner- I'm sure they've had a myriad of injuries due to their 'sport'.
Just be careful!!!
Oh- and sure, woman are made of endurance. We gotta be! We are the bringers of life- thank goodness for endurance.
Originally posted by damouse83
Nothing against the OP, but I think she has some issues with men. Probably because of issues with her father in her childhood.
Originally posted by Thestargateisreal
reply to post by damouse83
My father is the person on this earth that I am closest to. He's a great guy and he's the one that taught me to be competative. Please do not disrespect him.
Originally posted by Jepic
Both males and females are made for endurance. It all comes down to practice.
Originally posted by 3xil3
Originally posted by RMFX1
Originally posted by 3xil3
People should research a guy named Dean Karnazes
350 miles in 80 hours without stoppingedit on 21-8-2011 by 3xil3 because: (no reason given)
Why don't you tell us about him?
He is like a real life forest gump can run forever
edit on 21-8-2011 by 3xil3 because: (no reason given)
I have yet to hear, from a woman, that they are pushing themselves for their man, and their man is their driving force. 99% of the time, when a women is trying to prove they are tough, strong, and resilient, they are doing it for selfish reasons.
Originally posted by intrepid
16 pages on a scientific fact of decades, maybe centuries? Women physiologically ARE designed for endurance, men for strength. Of course there are anomalies. One can train ones self for damn near anything with determination. Both men and women have that. We should be talking about the average person. Not whether Chyna is as strong as Ahnold.