It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Mike_A
I don't know if you have an afro or skin head and since I can't confirm either, then yes you have both.
So, why do you believe in a god that does exist?
Again you’re not making any sense, it is impossible for me to both have an afro and a skinhead; we’re not talking about quantum states here.
Why does not knowing whether something exists or not mean that it must both exist and not exist at the same time? What is the logic that leads to this conclusion?
And I don’t believe in a god that does exist.
Originally posted by Mike_A
reply to post by GMan420
the inability or refusal to believe or to accept something as true.
The first definition of disbelief from the source you cited is;
the inability or refusal to believe or to accept something as true.
dictionary.reference.com...
If I say that I don’t know whether something exists I must necessarily be refusing to accept the truth of its existence. The alternative is to accept that its existence is true in which case I must know that it exists.
Therefore to say that I don’t know whether god exists is also to say that I disbelieve in its existence.
Disbelief does not equal uncertainty but uncertainty does equal disbelief.
I don't know what type of hair you have so for me to make a choice I have to believe in the choice I'm making and I refuse to have a believe about something so silly.
where is the logic in not believing in some thing that does exist?
Originally posted by Mike_A
reply to post by GMan420
Let’s get rid of the word “uncertainty”. My position on god is simply that I do not know whether or not such a being exists; my contention is that this is legitimately defined as atheism.
Since I say that I don’t know that god exists it would not make sense to also say I believe in god, therefore it must be the case that I refuse to or am unable to accept the truth of gods existence. In other words I exhibit a disbelief in the existence of a supreme being or beings as per your definition of atheism.
"My position on god is simply that I do not know whether or not such a being exists"
"...therefore it must be the case that I refuse to or am unable to accept the truth of gods existence"
I have no problem with Atheists, but I'm tired of their '' I am almighty, have all the answers, I am always right '' attitude.
That's a very well thought out argument.
Atheism is just plain stupid.
That’s my biggest problem with atheism. It’s just so stupid.
Tell me genius, where did God come from?
I have always believed Atheists to be suffering from a rather serious form of mental illness because they expect others to accept the idea that something can come from nothing. That’s just plain stupid, isn’t it?
People with higher IQs are less likely to believe in God -- Atheism correlates with higher IQs, so technically speaking, atheists are on average more intelligent that creationists.
BOOM
Originally posted by ColoradoJens
reply to post by bwinwright
move to chit chat. This thread is just plain stupid.
CJ
Originally posted by JAGx1981
No mods don't close this thread, leave it open. Why is it when Atheists bash religion it's all well and good and a '' debate'' but when atheism is attacked those whine and cry '' mods close the thread ''.
In fact atheism is stupid. You are against people whom believe in God, yet you believe in something that is even more of a longshot in creation because another human being thought he had the answers in book or speech you gazed at that drew your heart strings.
Contradiction after contradictions.
I have no problem with Atheists, but I'm tired of their '' I am almighty, have all the answers, I am always right '' attitude.
I agree, OP!
I think the IQ increase would precede the shift to atheism.
While I agree with you, I have to wonder about that statistic you linked.
If a theist becomes an atheist, or vice versa, does their IQ adjust accordingly?
The something I am referring to is classified as intelligence. The atheist believes that the universe and everything within it was the product of some mindless, non-intelligent event, and that intelligence had absolutely nothing to do with any of it? Now, please, that’s just plain stupid, isn’t it?
Can you name any form of order, just one example of orderliness that did not require some form of intelligence to produce or create it? Let me stop you now.
I don’t want you wasting too much time thinking about it. There is no such thing. All orderliness requires intelligent direction. This law, alone, proves atheism to be a false idea.
Originally posted by bwinwright
Atheism is just plain stupid.
That’s my biggest problem with atheism. It’s just so stupid. I have always believed Atheists to be suffering from a rather serious form of mental illness because they expect others to accept the idea that something can come from nothing. That’s just plain stupid, isn’t it?
The something I am referring to is classified as intelligence. The atheist believes that the universe and everything within it was the product of some mindless, non-intelligent event, and that intelligence had absolutely nothing to do with any of it? Now, please, that’s just plain stupid, isn’t it?
Can you name any form of order, just one example of orderliness that did not require some form of intelligence to produce or create it? Let me stop you now. I don’t want you wasting too much time thinking about it. There is no such thing. All orderliness requires intelligent direction. This law, alone, proves atheism to be a false idea.