It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Beijing develops pulse weapons

page: 3
18
<< 1  2    4  5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 22 2011 @ 07:22 PM
link   
reply to post by TheOneYouFearIsRight
 


Most likely they had this tech 10 years ago and there just admitting to it now...thats how the system works, you really think a coutry admits to everything it researches



posted on Jul, 22 2011 @ 07:25 PM
link   
So if they had it 10 years ago, why bring it out now?

Is there something that they are not telliing us?



posted on Jul, 22 2011 @ 07:31 PM
link   
If China has a pulse weapon, then you can bet your bottom dollar that the US has a Pulse buster. Then China will have a pulse buster buster...but, by then the US will have a pulse buster buster buster...

To this day, I swear that China can't come up with an original thought...all they do is back engineer current technology...which always leaves them 3 steps behind.



posted on Jul, 22 2011 @ 07:34 PM
link   
who builds a toy they dont use and they are probly gonna have to use it because no one wants them to have it so when they get one they will be attacked or befor they get one im american i let people defend them selves when they see fit and i shoot people in the back its what we do i personaly think they should be allowed to have it but thats just baby talk



posted on Jul, 22 2011 @ 08:07 PM
link   
China can easily take out the USA in one fail swoop. An EMP pulse would disable all veichles electronnics, computers etc. Heck the entire communications systems and transport would be cooked.

No transport: no food or supplies being shipped across the usa = instant death of USA



posted on Jul, 22 2011 @ 08:44 PM
link   
reply to post by TheOneYouFearIsRight
 


It does not matter because everything down to the Hummer is protected from EMP. They built them all Navy, Air force and Army weapons systems to work when nukes are exploding all around them.

Nothing short of a nuke exploding on top of or under a U.S. carrier will put it out of operation.



posted on Jul, 22 2011 @ 08:48 PM
link   
reply to post by Sky watcher
 


The military relies on civilian contractors and transport for its supplies etc. USA would not last without an intact transportation system.



posted on Jul, 22 2011 @ 08:51 PM
link   

Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONAL
China can easily take out the USA in one fail swoop. An EMP pulse would disable all veichles electronnics, computers etc. Heck the entire communications systems and transport would be cooked.

No transport: no food or supplies being shipped across the usa = instant death of USA


Please, get over your anti-US self. We have stuff China has wet dreams about ever having. Their planes are not even 1970s capable.

EMP protection was built into every piece of hardware the U.S. military since it was first figured out in the 50s.

One U.S. carrier battle group would need a nuke exploding on top of it to stop its war fighting capability. Since the battle group has air and sea dominance out to 250 miles, good luck with that.

If a U.S. carrier gets hit its because they wanted it to get hit to start a greater war.



posted on Jul, 22 2011 @ 08:54 PM
link   

Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONAL
reply to post by Sky watcher
 


The military relies on civilian contractors and transport for its supplies etc. USA would not last without an intact transportation system.


Oh do you really think they can sneak one into our missile defense system without getting nuked off the face of the map first. It will not matter. No nation on earth can defeat the U.S. military in battle, EVER!!!
edit on 22-7-2011 by Sky watcher because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 22 2011 @ 09:01 PM
link   
reply to post by Sky watcher
 


US military is already being defeated in Afghanistan. Also how would they know a sneak EMP attack where it came from? You really think no one can defeat the US military lmao, you are sadly mistaken. Our missile defense is only capable of attacking midcourse; there is no boost or terminal defense.

I have been studying the missile defense system for 15 years. It can't defend against boost or terminal missiles. Do you Know of any system capable of taking out topol-m missiles. No

The US military is being defeated in afghanistan right now; a third world country. It is embarrassing.
edit on 22-7-2011 by THE_PROFESSIONAL because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 22 2011 @ 09:05 PM
link   
reply to post by Sky watcher
 





One U.S. carrier battle group would need a nuke exploding on top of it to stop its war fighting capability. Since the battle group has air and sea dominance out to 250 miles, good luck with that.


You don't need a nuke to stop a carrier. Any simple conventional attack to ruin the runway would effectively put it out of business. You obviously do not understand modern warfare. Air sea dominance lmao, give me a break, did you hear about the russian fighters who buzzed the kitty hawk and the carrier was only able to get a freaking prowler off the ship; lmao. If they had hostile intentions, that carrier would have been sunk.




EMP protection was built into every piece of hardware the U.S. military since it was first figured out in the 50s.


EMP protection does not win a war. I already know that US hardware has emp protection; civialians are not. Do you think the US food supply tractors have EMP protection on it lmao? The military relies heavily on the civilian sector.
edit on 22-7-2011 by THE_PROFESSIONAL because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 22 2011 @ 09:07 PM
link   
reply to post by THE_PROFESSIONAL
 


That is information that is publicly available. Unless you are privileged to information, we the public, are not. Hell, who knows what kind of technology the United States Military possesses that is Above Top Secret. For all we know, there could be a web of satellites with missiles lasers. Not that I'm thinking that because it was shown how difficult that would be, but you get the point.

When one is cornered, all bets are off. If it ever got to the point that America was against the wall, who knows what will come out? With the trillions we have poured into Defense and Offense, we probably don't know the half of it.

ETA:

And as for your Afghanistan comment, the Soviet Union lost there too. It's an almost impossible region to control. Hundreds of ethnics groups, an inflammatory religion, and a public that is used to guerilla fighting. Tell me how you would win that war? The whole invasion idea was idiotic. Winning was not on our mind, revenge was.
edit on 22-7-2011 by isthisreallife because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 22 2011 @ 09:09 PM
link   
reply to post by isthisreallife
 


No matter how much money one has, you cannot defeat the laws of physics. The US military simply does not have the guts or determination that the Chinese do. Even if the Chinese are less advanced, in a conventional war, US carrier power would still lose out.



And as for your Afghanistan comment, the Soviet Union lost there too. It's an almost impossible region to control.


Yea but we are fighting a nation that was already beat down by a superpower and we still cant handle someone who has been beaten. That is extremely embarrassing. We are the SECOND world power to attack that country; i would understand if we were the first, but damn, its a third world country.



Winning was not on our mind, revenge was.


No to enrich the contractors, money was on our mind.
edit on 22-7-2011 by THE_PROFESSIONAL because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 22 2011 @ 09:36 PM
link   

Originally posted by zookey
Fear mongering scared Americans that cannot handle being not the number 1 of the world.

American's talk about a balance of power and then criticise other's for rebalancing the power to be more balanced away from the USA's dominatnt position.

If America doesn't want these places to develop this stuff, the US should stop doing it in the first place.

Seriously, stop acting like spoilled children/brats and act EQUAL in the world not the BE ALL AND END ALL of it.

If you want to act that way and be an American, do it in your own home, not ours.
edit on 22-7-2011 by zookey because: (no reason given)


What the hell are you talking about? Nobody said we are not equal except you on here by the way this isnt your home considering we invented the internet lol. Wait maybe you can call me and tell me that opps invented that too maybe take plane opps again. please stop your tired rant on hating America its old and sad.



posted on Jul, 22 2011 @ 09:45 PM
link   

Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONAL
China can easily take out the USA in one fail swoop. An EMP pulse would disable all veichles electronnics, computers etc. Heck the entire communications systems and transport would be cooked.


Can an EMP stop a well placed bullet? NEXT!



posted on Jul, 22 2011 @ 09:48 PM
link   
reply to post by Aggie Man
 


Bullet at whom? Does a bullet have a 3000 mile range to China? Next



posted on Jul, 22 2011 @ 09:51 PM
link   

Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONAL
reply to post by Sky watcher
 


US military is already being defeated in Afghanistan. Also how would they know a sneak EMP attack where it came from? You really think no one can defeat the US military lmao, you are sadly mistaken. Our missile defense is only capable of attacking midcourse; there is no boost or terminal defense.

I have been studying the missile defense system for 15 years. It can't defend against boost or terminal missiles. Do you Know of any system capable of taking out topol-m missiles. No

The US military is being defeated in afghanistan right now; a third world country. It is embarrassing.
edit on 22-7-2011 by THE_PROFESSIONAL because: (no reason given)


If you really think they are trying to win in A-stan then your more nuts than I thought. If we were trying to win you would see something like an Iraqi invasion. We have had Patriot 3 for years, That is terminal phase. Boost is taken out by the air borne laser, Mid-course is taken out by THADD or the Navy's Standard missile 3. Anymore questions since you have been studding ABM for longer than its been out?



posted on Jul, 22 2011 @ 09:55 PM
link   
reply to post by Sky watcher
 


Dude the ABL is not in production yet. It is still in testing phases and it cannot shoot a missile launched from middle of china, the laser does not have a thousand mile range. Also the Topol-M has a shorter burn phase than others so it is less detectable on Boost. The Patriot does not have the capability to defeat MARV terminal, it may only have terminal, but not against MARV terminal. Yes I have been studyng it for a long time; why do you think the only tests they are mostly doing are only midcourse. Because it is the easiest.
edit on 22-7-2011 by THE_PROFESSIONAL because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 22 2011 @ 09:55 PM
link   
reply to post by Sky watcher
 



EMP protection was built into every piece of hardware the U.S. military since it was first figured out in the 50s.


Do you have proof of that statement??

I find it hard to believe...



posted on Jul, 22 2011 @ 09:56 PM
link   

Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONAL
reply to post by Aggie Man
 


Bullet at whom? Does a bullet have a 3000 mile range to China? Next


Touche!

Ok, so they EMP the US...what next? ground invasion?

Let's say 1/3 of America is armed....let's say 1/5 of them can fire a single bullet truly...what's the body count?

They can destroy our electronics....we can do the same....what happens after that?

Of all the little men on planet Earth, the Chinamen are about as worrisome as a cloudy day.



new topics

top topics



 
18
<< 1  2    4  5 >>

log in

join