It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by cluckerspud
Will you stop making these threads when Elenin passes in October or will you somehow try and convince us that it made a U-turn.
Originally posted by Mr_skepticc
I been trying to figure out why such strange behavior from folks at NASA. I have known a guy since old college days that has worked for NASA over 12 years. It seems he has moved from a home they just bought recently, and hes left no phone, his cell phone and land line all terminated. I have talked with him for at least 20 years 2 or 3 times a month. I havent heard from him in 2 months, and cant find him.
I was also told that several big wigs up at RedStone arsenal in Huntsville, ALabama have told others that they would be leaving out of state soon, and they do not want to be contacted. This is odd since they are suppose to be able to be contacted 24-7. Its their job!
There is some strange things going on around the NASA community; however, I dont believe its due to this comet. I think some people just got really upset over the ending of the space shuttle missions. Some are loosing great jobs, I'm sure its very hard on everyone.
Originally posted by luxordelphi
OP: your enthusiasm for your subject is delightful. I am beginning to understand what you're saying about the points. A previous explanation in another thread had made it seem like pixelization but, of course, if that were so, the whole thing would be pixelized. I understand also how very crude and barbaric this representation is when compared to the sophisticated software that one imagines NASA having. There also seem to be some proximity differences particularly to Mars on Elenins' way out. Perhaps NASA has contracted out this part of their interface with the public (us) to inferior technicians? Perhaps these same technicians are actually there to censor as their main function and are just multi-tasking beyond their capabilities and that's why we have crooked lines?
Why does this Comet make "FOUR TURNS" in the JPL Orbit Diagram?" Elenin is the only one I could find that makes (no less than 4) turns after crossing Mars' Orbit on the way in, and on the way out. Is this normal? If this is because they are unable to project the precise orbital path, then why wouldn't they simply project Elenin's path... WITHOUT ... inserting these turns?
---
In case anyone else claims they can't see the obvious turns on the JPL link here are the approximate dates this Comets turns... like no other!
6/22/11
8/17/11
9/11/11 (hmmmmm)
10/10/11
12/9/11
View the animation and stop on each of these dates... then tell me you don't see Elenin turn along it's path... If you think this is normal then just find another Comet that makes these turns on JPL's site... I couldn't and I am honestly hoping someone else can.
Just don't tell me you don't see the damn thing turn... when it TURNS and IT'S OBVIOUS!!! Richard C Hoagland statement during the Project Camelot Roundtable
There are two versions of orbital calculations for Elenin, one was calculated by JPL which defines the orbit as hyperbolic which means it's a one time visitor to our solar system and will never return.
The other is the discoverer of Elenin, Mr Leonid Elenin who has calculated that the object is in an eliptical orbit of 13,000 years which is half of Earths Orbit around the Galatic centre.
So that's interesting in itself, which is correct?
At the end of July and the beginning of August Elenin is going to cross the orbit of the Earth at about 1.5 AU (astromonical unit, one unit being the distance from the Sun to the Earth. 1 AU is 93 Million Miles). Richard says on or about 2nd August.
NASA has two satetelites in orbit one is Stereo A the other is Stereo B. On the 2nd August Elenin will pass close to Stereo B (4.5 Million miles from Stereo B) NASA plans to turn SB (Stereo B) around to face Elenin rather than the Sun which it does now so that it can get the data of the make up etc of Elenin.
Elenin then comes only .482 AU away from the Sun on Sept 11th that not really possible which makes that is one of the first indications that this object may not be a normal object!
On the 17th Oct it passes in front of the Earth at .232 AU which is only 22 million miles heading out into the solar system , (is it a comet? nibiru or brown dwarf?) its not nibiru (supposedly)
IF NOT FOR THE FACT THAT IT HAPPENS ON VERY INTERESTING TIMES, DATES & ANGLES WE WOULD NOT BE HAVING THIS ROUNDTABLE TODAY.
Originally posted by sagigirl
reply to post by Mizzijr
you are a heartless lier. I took pic of Planet x by myself and saw a winged gas planet which can move 20 degrees from night to morning. i dont know how to put tht pic here. All the news on PX are true. before it's too late, be prepared and save urself. For more info, read poleshift.ning.com...
Originally posted by MACchine
reply to post by Pseudonaut
Nonseclator
Non sequitur (pronounced /nɒnˈsɛkwɪtər/) is Latin for "it does not follow." It is most often used as a noun to describe illogical statements.
There are two versions of orbital calculations for Elenin, one was calculated by JPL which defines the orbit as hyperbolic which means it's a one time visitor to our solar system and will never return.
The other is the discoverer of Elenin, Mr Leonid Elenin who has calculated that the object is in an eliptical orbit of 13,000 years which is half of Earths Orbit around the Galatic centre.
Elenin then comes only .482 AU away from the Sun on Sept 11th that not really possible which makes that is one of the first indications that this object may not be a normal object!
Originally posted by MACchine
Originally posted by xacto
Originally posted by MACchine
reply to post by xacto
I think the term you were lookin for was nonsecretor.
There was an original Star Trek episode where Kirk talked a computer into going insane and then it blew-up !!!
When he died he kept saying: Nonseclator, nonseclator, nonseclator, nonseclator, nonseclator, nonseclator !
It means it can not resolve conflicting data.
No, I would imagine it was actually saying 'non sequitur' which literally means 'it does not follow'. Kind of thing you would say if someone said, say, that the Beatles broke up because a comet was going to hit the earth decades later - it doesn't follow logic.edit on 19-7-2011 by something wicked because: clean up
Originally posted by MACchine
reply to post by Pseudonaut
Nonseclator
Originally posted by Pauligirl
Originally posted by MACchine
reply to post by Pseudonaut
Nonseclator
Is this what you are trying to say?
Non sequitur (pronounced /nɒnˈsɛkwɪtər/) is Latin for "it does not follow." It is most often used as a noun to describe illogical statements.
If so, 'll leave it to others to point out the obvious.