It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by intrepid
Originally posted by beezzer
No sir. Just simply pointing out that this is not an isolated event.
What? Government employees doing something wrong? That doesn't qualify as news. We're the worst. Trying to pin this on Muslims? :shk:
Originally posted by beezzer
Trying to focus on the fact that it was not allowed because of cultural sensitivities. The fact that it was muslims (speculative) illustrates that it is just another "isolated event" where their sensitivities take precedence over all others.
Originally posted by beezzer
The fact that it was muslims (speculative)
... illustrates that it is just another "isolated event" where their sensitivities take precedence over all others.
Originally posted by intrepid
Conjecture counselor. Speculative. No basis in fact. Including the facts that YOU brought to the table.
Originally posted by InfaRedMan
Originally posted by intrepid
Originally posted by InfaRedMan
You're right BH! It must have been them pesky Rastafarians, Jedis or Tibetan Monks in the building! We all know how much they object to, and like to cover the female form.
IRM
Well, I guess we shouldn't let facts get in the way of sensationalistic drivel.
Respectfully Intrepid, If it wasn't the muslims, what cultural group (demographics aside), in your humble opinion, do you think would be sensitive to a woman breast feeding, or a woman that was 'uncovered'? Who could it possibly be? Who fits the profile? Who's cultural sensitivities was this staffer assuming she may have been protecting? If the story is true of course!
IRMedit on 14/7/11 by InfaRedMan because: typos n stuff!
NASHVILLE, Tenn. – A bill making its way through the legislature would get rid of the age restriction on how old a child can be to breast feed in public. Under current Tennessee state law, women who breast feed a child older than twelve months in public can be arrested for public indecency.
Originally posted by beezzer
Fact: Multi-cultural area wth a 4th of the population mid-eastern.
Fact: A woman was stopped from breast feeding because it might offend a portion of the population.
Fact: You among others, assumed it wasn't islam-based.
Your Honour, I bring to the table nothing but the truth.
How it is interpreted is up to the reader.
Originally posted by Wertdagf
reply to post by intrepid
So your more against public breast feeding than gay sex?
Strange position for a religious person.
Originally posted by beezzer
Fact: A woman was stopped from breast feeding because it might offend a portion of the population.
Fact: You among others, assumed it wasn't islam-based.
Your Honour, I bring to the table nothing but the truth.
Originally posted by beezzer
Is this an isolated event? No. Sadly it isn't. Even if this story turns out to be false, the next several won't be. I can bet you a shiny new coin that within the week, there will be another story, another place, but with the same theme.
Originally posted by intrepid
Originally posted by InfaRedMan
Respectfully Intrepid, If it wasn't the muslims, what cultural group (demographics aside), in your humble opinion, do you think would be sensitive to a woman breast feeding, or a woman that was 'uncovered'? Who could it possibly be? Who fits the profile? Who's cultural sensitivities was this staffer led to believe she may have been protecting?
IRM
Strict Christians for one. As an aside I don't like women BF in public. I know it's natural. I know it's the law but that doesn't mean I have to like it and I don't.
Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by intrepid
Okay. I'll just bottom line it.
In an area where there are many muslims, a woman was stopped before she could breat feed because it might offend.
Was the person wrong to stop her? Yes.
Was she corrected? Yes.
Is this an isolated event? No. Sadly it isn't. Even if this story turns out to be false, the next several won't be. I can bet you a shiny new coin that within the week, there will be another story, another place, but with the same theme.
Chalk this one up to speculative, if you must. But it is not an isolated event.
regards,
Originally posted by My.mind.is.mine
Actually the bottom line is a receptionist was corrected after enforcing a policy that didn't exist. THE END...
That other # is just a large mass of figments of your seemingly paranoid imagination.
You seem to not understand that in that area, muslims are a MINORITY, so logic and elementary math would say it's MORE likely to be a White British Christian.