More hatred from the Christians

Originally posted by The Djin

all sin is equal in the eyes of God, and all sin can be forgiven.

reply to post by defcon5

 

Except the consumption of blood, xtianity is a major make it up as you go along cult and I'm constantly amazed to see so many narrow minded, deluded sheep posting on a site whos motto is "Deny Ignorance".

To my mind there can be nothing more ignorant than a person that has to cherry pick an inconsistant contradictory multiple copied book written by who knows how many men hundreds of years ago, in order to be told how to think.

Except the consumption of blood?? what are you ..a vampire? Seems odd that you would put down all of Christianities concepts , except the consumption of blood...

Originally posted by gabby2011

Originally posted by The Djin

all sin is equal in the eyes of God, and all sin can be forgiven.

reply to post by defcon5

 

Except the consumption of blood, xtianity is a major make it up as you go along cult and I'm constantly amazed to see so many narrow minded, deluded sheep posting on a site whos motto is "Deny Ignorance".

To my mind there can be nothing more ignorant than a person that has to cherry pick an inconsistant contradictory multiple copied book written by who knows how many men hundreds of years ago, in order to be told how to think.

Except the consumption of blood?? what are you ..a vampire? Seems odd that you would put down all of Christianities concepts , except the consumption of blood...

Ye shall eat the blood of no manner of flesh: for the life of all flesh is the blood thereof: whosoever eateth it shall be cut off.” (Leviticus 17:14)

Notice the word "whosoever" ? Yaweh the creator of all that there is, was and will ever be is pretty unambigeous about who can't consume blood and even when he changed his name to jesus and came to earth again he was quite clear that he had not changed his mind.

It is easier for Heaven and Earth to pass away than for the smallest part of the letter of the law to become invalid." Luke 16:17

reply to post by The Djin


Hi Djin,

where HAVE you been? And no bad excuses about having mundane obligations; this place is becoming so serious without you, that not even mature whiskey can take away the taste of dust.

But I'm afraid, that the above won't be enough to justify a post, so some reference to blood and then eventually to thread-topic is probably expected.

The blood-connotation is obvious, originating from a time when sacrifice was considered an important part of bartering with the unknown to keep misery in existence down. That it's been updated to transubstantiated blood is ofcourse more 'civilized', but the idea is still the same: Sacrifice is needed to placate an angry 'god'.

I believe, they make synthetic bloodplasma these days, but that would be too easy to use. The element of submission would be excluded this way.

"Donate ½ liter of bloodplasma, and everything will be honky-dory". Where's the grovelling in that?

Similarly some other out-dated and brutal notions have survived. E.g. 'god' not liking poofters. Ofcourse not, back home on the ol' plantation, Massa ALSO counted on making more slaves as part of the business. Not only the cotton-picking thing.

Poofters are notoriously bad as breeding equipment. Ergo: They are baaaaaad.

Simple inductive reasoning, from simple inductivated theists.

Click here for more information.

reply to post by The Djin


In the meantime, I'm slowly being promoted to a semi-official status (from parts of the theist camp) of Satan-spawn.

At the same time, the problems in my life from recent years are diminishing, so while this is far from being the basis of a statistical evaluation of divine damnation intervention/irreligious behaviour, it corresponds with the conclusions of sane mindsets, which haven't decided on any answer from the start.

Have you noticed the recent trend: "You can't understand 'god', before you acknowledge and meet him; so shut up, you're disqualified".

Read my way: "Unless you join a brainwashing program, indoctrinating you to believe my way, you're biased from your trust in objective perspectives".

Which raises the interesting question: How many of the censorship-loving pro-theists here on this thread are just zombis and how many are natural homophobes.

PS You who are a kind of specialist on such small oddities. Have you heard, that the danish state-radio has been told to use 'christian values'. This is not a danish expression of love for christians, but a political islamophobic manifestation.

Islamophobia being a safer bet than homophobia. At least Islam does have Jihad, while kamikaze poofters last were seen in Zulu-land around the boer-wars.

Can you two have your reunion via U2U?

What does any of this have to do with the thread topic?

Click here for more information.

Originally posted by NOTurTypical
Can you two have your reunion via U2U?

What does any of this have to do with the thread topic?

Djin and I have for a long time included a few personal comments on our posts. A certain amount of easy-going chat won't destroy a thread.

I can only answer for my own posts concerning topic relevance:

You can try with: HOMOPHOBIA for a starter.

It does my old heart good to see you so reformed, that you have become a guardian of forum rules.

Have you heard, that the danish state-radio has been told to use 'christian values'. This is not a danish expression of love for christians, but a political islamophobic manifestation.

reply to post by bogomil


And it doesn't go unnoticed that Denmark is a huge producer of bacon in europe this indeed some powerful christian Kung Fu.

You be careful Bogomil remember Stephen Kings' "Thinner"

reply to post by The Djin


I did manage to read your post, rather harmless imo; but well, that's the rules of the game. There's been some pretty heavy mudflinging around recently, I have e.g. (again) been diagnosed schizophrenic (or was it just psychotic) myself by some pro-theist amateur psychologist, and nothing happened to that post.

But to be fair, OP on this thread isn't using silk-gloves either, so the whole thing did start polarized.

reply to post by bogomil

HOMOPHOBIA for a starter.

Who can you recall ever being terrified of homosexuals?

I don't know of anyone.

Originally posted by NOTurTypical
Can you two have your reunion via U2U?

What does any of this have to do with the thread topic?

Well my previoue post would have answered that for you, but sadly the polite police denied you the privalage of being informed,

Hm where have we seen that kind of tyrranical behaviour before that before ?

Originally posted by The Djin

Originally posted by NOTurTypical
Can you two have your reunion via U2U?

What does any of this have to do with the thread topic?

Well my previoue post would have answered that for you, but sadly the polite police denied you the privalage of being informed,

You seem to not be able to express your opinions without violating the terms and conditions of the website. Hate much?

Hm where have we seen that kind of tyrranical behaviour before that before ?

Did that make sense when you typed it?

Originally posted by NOTurTypical
reply to post by bogomil

 

HOMOPHOBIA for a starter.

Who can you recall ever being terrified of homosexuals?

I don't know of anyone.

You know, I don't join in your semantic acrobatics beyond a certain point. But for the duration.....

Poland, possibly one of the most homophobic cultures on a global scale, about which has been published books including the title word 'homophobic' (without any protest I'm aware of, of the word used in this context). I'm firsthand very familiar with polish culture.

If you want a more extensive analysis of homophobia (which I then will make using MY definiton of the word), that's OK with me, and you can then start yourself by getting around to answer to my earlier question, of how you include bed-chamber activities (or whatever, we can go back and look) as being a part of gay parades.

But I'm glad, that you move in such liberal circles, that you've never met any homophobes (such as you define them).

Originally posted by NOTurTypical
reply to post by bogomil

 

HOMOPHOBIA for a starter.

Who can you recall ever being terrified of homosexuals?

I don't know of anyone.

The answer is Yaweh of course, I'm sure you would agree that most cases of violent/destructive behaviour is rooted in fear as a matter of fact I have on quite a few occasions heard xtians preaching this.

With this in mind let us look at Yawhehs' behaviour -
He allegedly created men, and as the creator of all that there is/was and will ever be, which obviously and logically includes all thought and action there is no action without his intent.
However, homosexuals apparently act in a manner contrary to the will of this god, now logically this can either be completely untrue or the impetus for the homsoexual action was/is/will be created by something other than Yahwhe.

Christianity stand by the claim that it is truth, that homosexual action is contrary to the will of this god so the seperate origin must also be true.

A seperate creator is borne out in xtian literature where Yahweh directly says that there are other gods and the literature makes it quite clear that men were created by "Gods" plural.

We can now logically deduce that as Yahweh hates two men laying with each other as they would a woman and will torture them for all eternity for doing so (even after being stoned to death) and has not prevented men from doing s., Then Yahwhe is likely to be in fear of something and as likely as not, afraido of the other gods that created what Yahweh didn't.

So who is afraid of homosexuals ? Christians of course as they claim they were made by Yahwhe in his/their image QED

reply to post by bogomil


The term was coined to ridicule people who object to homosexual lifestyle. I'm not going to entertain the mis-use of the word "phobia". The "acrobatics" were when the term was used to refer to people objecting of the homosexual lifestyle.

Not sure if you're aware of this, but Christians are not the only people who object to homosexual lifestyles or sexual practices.


With that said, can you provide evidence of people being terrified of homosexuals? If you cannot, then there is no "phobia".

According to the American Psychiatric Association, a phobia is "an irrational and excessive fear of an object or situation."

With that in mind can you provide evidence this affects people who object to homosexual lifestyles or practices for either religious, philosophical, practical, or hygienic reasons?

Or is it just a term coined to ridicule people who don't agree with the lifestyle?

reply to post by NOTurTypical

With that in mind can you provide evidence this affects people who object to homosexual lifestyles or practices for either religious, philosophical, practical, or hygienic reasons?

The bibles say nothing of a lifestyle merely one man lying with another as if with a woman so can you clarify what you are actually talking about.

Take into consideration that just like jesus men can live with and love other men but may not be laying with them like a woman but still be label by xtians and such as homosexuals and fags etc.

Also jesus/yawhe is alledged to have spent the night with a naked young man showing him his secrets should he be known as a Pederast or Homosexual ?

Does one need to be in a long term relationship or is it just the anal sex thing etc ?

reply to post by NOTurTypical


Anyone who does not approve of the homosexual lifestyle
is automatically BRANDED a homophobe.
I don't care what others do behind closed doors,do they
have to force their lifestyle choices down my throat?
It is pretty sad when ones' sexual appetites defines who they
are as a person.

reply to post by NOTurTypical


You wrote:

["The term was coined to ridicule people who object to homosexual lifestyle. I'm not going to entertain the mis-use of the word "phobia". The "acrobatics" were when the term was used to refer to people objecting of the homosexual lifestyle."]

and

Quote: ["With that said, can you provide evidence of people being terrified of homosexuals? If you cannot, then there is no "phobia"."]


See, it's started already, and as I said, play your semantic games without me.

The key-word is ofcourse your initial use of 'fear', which I don't put much importance to in this context.

There's a world of difference between objecting to something, even from the simple motivation of just disliking it, to interfering with the rights of those you don't like (or are defined unclean or whatever from a holy manual). As with all these problems involving some theists not being able to accept the rules of egalitarian, liberal, secular democracy, it eventually is a question of their claims of extra-parliamentary privileges, because they consider themselves as elitists possessing a superior 'truth'.

This is ideological fascism and is a threat not only to the minorities being targeted, but also to the principles of democracy.

I am aware of other homophobic groups than extremist christians; but they are not on this thread presently.