It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Vicky32
Originally posted by bogomil
It's unlikely she's(?) new. She already knows the 'christian persecution' gambit.
Sigh, you are nothing if not predictable.
You are one of the chief 'persecutors', and you know it. Sometimes you can seem so reasonable, and then wham you pounce! Like a cat toys with a mouse before killing it.
I shall be on my guard now! Thank you for reminding me how unreasonable you really are...
V
Originally posted by bogomil
for some people mixed-race relationships used to be offensive in a not distant past. For some it may even be to this day.
Originally posted by Vicky32
Originally posted by bogomil
for some people mixed-race relationships used to be offensive in a not distant past. For some it may even be to this day.
Your point is? Oh, I get it, you're trying to equate homosexual activities with mixed race marriages! Total fail. Being black (for instance) is not a choice.
One man blowing another man, for example, is.
Originally posted by Itisnowagain
reply to post by Vicky32
Remember, remember.
Don't feed the troll.
Namaste.
McCarty'ism vs communism
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
reply to post by bogomil
McCarty'ism vs communism
Detour for a brief second...
Are you aware the Venona Papers completely exonerated McCarthy?
Originally posted by bogomil
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
reply to post by bogomil
McCarty'ism vs communism
Detour for a brief second...
Are you aware the Venona Papers completely exonerated McCarthy?
No, I'm not aware of that.
Appears to be about domestic US communism
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
Detour for a brief second...
Are you aware the Venona Papers completely exonerated McCarthy?
Originally posted by sezsue
reply to post by Shamatt
I think you misunderstand.
It's not that Christians categorize it that way arbitrarily, it's what God says in the Bible.
The reason for this is that all these behaviors are detrimental behaviors that are damaging, whether to the spirit, or to the body.
His ultimate plan was for a man and a woman to be in a stable relationship in order to raise children. A marriage union between a man and a woman is the best for the children. Of course, this assumes that the couple are behaving according to God's laws.
He also says, hate the sin, not the sinner.
Originally posted by sezsue
reply to post by Shamatt
I think you misunderstand.
It's not that Christians categorize it that way arbitrarily, it's what God says in the Bible.
The reason for this is that all these behaviors are detrimental behaviors that are damaging, whether to the spirit, or to the body.
His ultimate plan was for a man and a woman to be in a stable relationship in order to raise children. A marriage union between a man and a woman is the best for the children. Of course, this assumes that the couple are behaving according to God's laws.
He also says, hate the sin, not the sinner.
Originally posted by Shamatt
Originally posted by sezsue
reply to post by Shamatt
I think you misunderstand.
It's not that Christians categorize it that way arbitrarily, it's what God says in the Bible.
The reason for this is that all these behaviors are detrimental behaviors that are damaging, whether to the spirit, or to the body.
His ultimate plan was for a man and a woman to be in a stable relationship in order to raise children. A marriage union between a man and a woman is the best for the children. Of course, this assumes that the couple are behaving according to God's laws.
He also says, hate the sin, not the sinner.
That is your opinion and you are welcome to it. I can't prove you are wrong and it would be rude of me to even suggest it.
There a millions who do not share your beleifs. Live and let live seems to be a fare middle ground. I won't preach to you if you don't preach to me? Accept we are different and respect that.
Originally posted by Seagle
reply to post by Shamatt
G'day Shamatt...do you mind if I just call you 'Sham' ? Is that what your friends call you? Its certainly a more accurate description.
Lets see...subsidiary company of global media/ advertising organisation provides free bus shelters all over the world in return for rights to sell advertising on said free bus shelters for a period of 20 yrs.
Advertising agency places condom ad featuring gay men in a bus shelter frequented by young school children on a daily bases.
Advertising agency begins complaining about its own ad to media outlets, religeous groups, family groups and creates media frenzy gaining massive free international exposure across all advertising mediams.
Advertising agency removes poster supposedly in response to backlash and then creates a protest facebook page, twitter account and gains instant rapport with true target audience. Agency puts poster back up and becomes hero to target audience.
Did I miss much??? Oh yeah, did I mention the bit about parent company being of Jewish faith.. Sham?
edit on 3-6-2011 by Seagle because: (no reason given)