It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by CobraCommander
In NY state, it is a crime to have sex when you are 16 years old. Not 15 not 17, but 16. If you are 16 and have sex with another 16 year old, you can BOTH be tried as an adult, put on the sex offender registry for life, and be sent to jail.
Originally posted by Maslo
reply to post by Bee2010
All right, then I guess we will have to agree to disagree.
FYI, conventional rape laws still apply, it is only statutory rape laws that we are talking about, so these rapists are still dealt with even in states and countries with close-age exceptions.
In NY state, it is a crime to have sex when you are 16 years old. Not 15 not 17, but 16. If you are 16 and have sex with another 16 year old, you can BOTH be tried as an adult, put on the sex offender registry for life, and be sent to jail.
Originally posted by JudasIscariot
Hanging child rapists isn't good enough... These people need to be tortured every day and live the rest of their lives in confusion and fear.
Originally posted by reesie45
Well it should be done in a way that it wouldn't be liked.
Originally posted by confreak
Originally posted by reesie45
Its simple, If someone rapes a child, then they themselves should be raped. If they rape and kill, same should be done to them in that order, vice versa. Say they shoot someone, they should be shot the same number of times in the same areas they shot the victim. Its called karma, and we can implement it if we wanted to. Anyone agree?
I humbly disagree, simply because,
those who rape, might like getting raped.
Originally posted by OldCorp
Originally posted by Bee2010
reply to post by OldCorp
Why only children under 12? Does the 13, 14 and 15 year old victim deserve less? Are you implying that victims from 13 on don't suffer the same damage or is it that by then those children have hit puberty and are therefore ready for a sexual experience?
I have a distant relative by marriage who was convicted of statutory rape. He was 18 and his girlfriend was 15 when they started having consensual sex. When they broke up two years later, the girl pressed charges against him, and now his life is ruined because he's labeled a "sex offender." So there is a bit of wiggle room for adolescent teens that might mitigate the severity of the punishment.
This is not true for children under 12 who are raped by what can only be deemed as a predator. No wiggle room there.edit on 5/30/2011 by OldCorp because: (no reason given)