It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
Originally posted by warbird03
That doesn't absolve the girl..
Legally, it does. At 15, sex can't be consensual, as she was not legally old enough to give consent. She CAN'T give consent.
Originally posted by kimish
reply to post by AnitaCigarette
I like your train of thought. There may be some truth into that.
Regardless, it does take two to tango, teens are more mature now than when I was a teen so she was most likely totally coherent in her decision to be with the man. The man on the other hand, probably shouldn't be put in prison for what he did but he does need some form of rehabilitation ie. put through some sort of mental institution or mandatory psychiatric/ psychological counseling. I mean, granted she may have been sexually mature but it doesn't take a rocket scientist to know that teens, especially at that age are not mentally mature.
Originally posted by kimish
But, what if the girl told the man she was 16, or 17, of legal age? What if he thought she was legal because thats what she told him. Would the same punishment still apply to him as she gets away with manipulating a man?
Originally posted by warbird03
reply to post by AnitaCigarette
It's only a one-way street if she didn't want it. There's nothing in the link that says either way, although it makes it sound like it was mutual. Yes, I realize she's underage. I don't agree with his actions and I think it's disgusting. That doesn't absolve the girl. As I said, if it turns out that it was against her will, I'm all for any and every cruel punishment available. Otherwise, they're both at fault.
Oh, right. There's a guy involved, so everything's all his fault.
Originally posted by Lemon.Fresh
And what of the mother?
Originally posted by Lemon.Fresh
You are smarter than that, BH.
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
Originally posted by kimish
But, what if the girl told the man she was 16, or 17, of legal age? What if he thought she was legal because thats what she told him. Would the same punishment still apply to him as she gets away with manipulating a man?
Yes and here's why. She's underage. The responsibility for HIS legal actions falls with HIM and HIM only. It's HIS responsibility to be certain that he doesn't sleep with a minor. There's nothing illegal about manipulating a man. If there were, most women would be in prison. (ha-ha, just joking, ladies)
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
Originally posted by kimish
But, what if the girl told the man she was 16, or 17, of legal age? What if he thought she was legal because thats what she told him. Would the same punishment still apply to him as she gets away with manipulating a man?
Yes and here's why. She's underage. The responsibility for HIS legal actions falls with HIM and HIM only. It's HIS responsibility to be certain that he doesn't sleep with a minor. There's nothing illegal about manipulating a man. If there were, most women would be in prison. (ha-ha, just joking, ladies)
Originally posted by cluckerspud
The mother should be made accountable for her parenting skills and endangerment.
The man should be charged and the girl should be enrolled in counseling, perhaps with her mother.
Of course all of the parties involved should be accountable and laws applied.
I still don't see the twist.
Originally posted by cluckerspud
The mother should be made accountable for her parenting skills and endangerment.
The man should be charged and the girl should be enrolled in counseling, perhaps with her mother.
Of course all of the parties involved should be accountable and laws applied.
Originally posted by warbird03
Honestly, there's nowhere near enough information to make any judgements about it. Yes, it sounds bad. No, I'm not trying to defend the guy. There's just not much to go on.
I guess my point is, don't take one side or the other when we really don't know much about it.
Originally posted by snapperski
reply to post by GogoVicMorrow
ER HELLO ....she 15 so he was having sex with her when she was 14 or even younger(hence the baby)....in my books his a pedophille ...i'm shocked you seem ok with this.edit on 4-4-2011 by snapperski because: grammer
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
Originally posted by Lemon.Fresh
And what of the mother?
What about her FATHER??? What about the school? The church? I mean, you can bring in all sorts of people to blame, but there's only ONE person who is legally responsible for this man bedding an underage girl. And that's HIM.
Don't you believe in personal responsibility? The mother did NOT do this. Am I to be blamed for all the stuff I didn't prevent?
Originally posted by cluckerspud
The mother should be made accountable for her parenting skills and endangerment.
The man should be charged and the girl should be enrolled in counseling, perhaps with her mother.
Of course all of the parties involved should be accountable and laws applied.
I still don't see the twist.
Court records show that Galvan told the girl’s mother he was willing to sign a document that he would take care of the girl and their baby.
The mother refused saying she had been trying to keep her and Galvan apart for the past year.
Originally posted by Lemon.Fresh
The twist is that the police and courts knee-jerk and goes off on the man, while saying nothing of the mother.
Hell . . . the people who "deny ignorance" are sheeple after all. Look at this thread for proof. There is your twist.
Originally posted by cluckerspud
The mother should be made accountable for her parenting skills and endangerment.
The man should be charged and the girl should be enrolled in counseling, perhaps with her mother.
Of course all of the parties involved should be accountable and laws applied.
I still don't see the twist.