It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by sign00
There are countless records of the Stone existing, being demonstrated, etc
The question is not whether the records exist (50+ are quoted in the book) but whether you ignore them or not.
What nonsense this thread has turned into!
Originally posted by LiveToSpendIt
The Nazi's did have the science behind the nature of what the Philosopher's Stone legend that legend is fairly well represented in J. K. Rowling's Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's (Philosopher's) Stone. The science is not turning piss to pewter or any other such garbage, the science is the dynamic transmutation of energy.
Via EMF manipulation and guess what, so have we! Just Google John Hutchinson and his many anti-gravity floating cannonballs and melted steel experiments and on and on. the Russkies were "Philosopher Stoning" us in the 70s creating cancers in our Moscow embassies and...the list is endless. Nothing special, really, the trick is in getting the Devil's details correct (freq, etc etc etc).
Originally posted by CythraulI found out about the book through Jay Weidner's website and was glad to see a thread come up about it. I'm not saying I believe or disbelieve, but I'm sure as hell open-minded enough that as soon as I save enough money to buy the necessary distilling equipment I'll be having a go.
Originally posted by LiveToSpendIt
A word of caution. Whether you believe of disbelieve is inherent in your success. IOW, your in for a serious waste of time and money if you do not believe and firmly, unwaveringly commit that the Stone can be made by this process.
This understanding is emphasized in Philosopher Stone lore time and time again. The alchemist must be pure of heart and intention for his and the metal/piss' to be transmutated. You think you can make gold from urine salts and become immortal by tinkering around with a few formulas in your spare time without any emotional, psychological and, most importantly, spiritual attachments? Seriously?
Originally posted by WillowToad
I'm reading the thing supposedly written by our anonymouse author who is also our anonymouse poster sign00. It's well written i'll give Mr. Anonymouse that much.
[the urine] must be purged of its watery and earthy nature (for at first it appears an earthy, heavy, thick, slimy, and misty body), and all that is thick, nebulous, opaque, and dark in it must be removed, that thus, by a final sublimation, the heart and inner soul contained in it may be separated and reduced to a precious essence.
Originally posted by WillowToad
Sez
[the urine] must be purged of its watery and earthy nature (for at first it appears an earthy, heavy, thick, slimy, and misty body), and all that is thick, nebulous, opaque, and dark in it must be removed, that thus, by a final sublimation, the heart and inner soul contained in it may be separated and reduced to a precious essence.
Originally posted by WillowToad
I'm reading the thing supposedly written by our anonymouse author who is also our anonymouse poster sign00. It's well written i'll give Mr. Anonymouse that much.
Originally posted by LiveToSpendIt
Originally posted by WillowToad
I'm reading the thing supposedly written by our anonymouse author who is also our anonymouse poster sign00. It's well written i'll give Mr. Anonymouse that much.
Above I promised "more stranger" so on with it!
In the OP opening as sign00 he claimed
"This is a strange story so bare with me. I'm a member of forgottenbooks.org and 2 days ago I got an announcement they sent to all their members saying that a manuscript called 'The Book of Aquarius' had been anonymously emailed into their site."
Then when questioned about particular details of the book he interjected "I do believe I already wrote a book on it" directly stating he is the author.
www.abovetopsecret.com..." target="_blank" class="postlink" rel="nofollow">Claims Authorship
His signature is (at this writing 13.12.2011)
"The Book of Aquarius - Free book detailing how to make the Philosophers Stone"
Originally posted by LiveToSpendIt
A word of caution...
Originally posted by Cythraul Whilst I'm grateful for your word of caution, I do think it's strange that you chose to target me. Surely there are bigger doubters in this thread than I.
I tend to agree with what you say, which is why during the planning and research of my project I intend to reach a conclusion about whether this is feasible or not. If doubt remains, I shan't proceed.
Originally posted by Cythraul
Surely there are bigger doubters in this thread than I.
Originally posted by ErroneousDylan
No offense to the nay-sayers but... why don't you just let these people indulge in their curiosity and try it?
Sure, it could be an expensive waste of money, but personally, I feel that it would be a neat experiment, regardless of results. Plus, I wouldn't mind having the alchemical tools around any way, for further experiments (non-Philosophers' Stone related). Not that I am confirming or denying any claims that are made about the Stone but for us to simple go by "your word" would be just as asinine as for us to go strictly by the word of the author. The only way for us to know indefinitely would be for us to try it.
On the one hand, yeah I could end up with wasting about a few weeks of time and then a few minutes out of my days after that for a couple years. Plus, I'd have all this equipment lying around (alembic, flasks, etc.) but I wouldn't mind dolling out some cash for those items any way, if I had the free-money for it.
On the other hand (and I know this is the part where you start laughing), if it did work... the time and effort would definitely be worth it in a lot of people's books. I don't really need to go into details about the benefits of one as I'm sure you know the claims.
Originally posted by jellyfishbrains
Anyone care to sum up what could have been discussed over 19 pages? This is still about eating piss because it contains "energy" right?