It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Game_Over
Pterdine, I will help you out. I merely asked you three times now to answer your own questions you asked of me.
What, exactly, brought down the towers and how?
What actually struck the Pentagon?
Did a plane crash in SW PA? "
Originally posted by impressme
I can tell you that most intelligent people that I have talked to and do not know about ATS still know the OS is mostly hogwash, yet a man with your education
Originally posted by impressme
reply to post by pteridine
So you believe in the OS? I can tell you that most intelligent people that I have talked to and do not know about ATS still know the OS is mostly hogwash, yet a man with your education and intelligent that have been exposed to more evidence proving the OS is a lie and yet you still supports it, how patriotic of you.
You do not have any room to criticize me and my beliefs of demolition when the OS of how the WTC destruction have been proven a lie, and not just by Steven Jones. Science proves that the WTC could not have falling by jet fuel and office fires and we don’t need Steven Jones peer review Journal to prove that either. There are plenty of scientific technical papers written about the WTC destruction. The fact is there are no technical scientific papers written to the OS destruction of the WTC, which any scientists support.
The fact is, leaving out the lying NIST, most scientist support demolition to the WTC and you cannot debunk that
Originally posted by Game_Over
reply to post by pteridine
Thank you for finally answering your own questions.
Your question: "What, exactly, brought down the towers and how?
Your answer: Gravity brought the towers down after aircraft disrupted the integrity of the structures through impact and uncontrolled fires. There is no evidence that explosives or thermite instigated the collapse."
My response:
-- Very interesting answer. However you are wrong. Three towers fell that day slick and only two were hit by planes. Your entire theory is now useless. Did you hear me...it is clear for the entire world to view this thread and see that you are wrong. Why can you not handle wtc7? What about it makes your stay awake at night as your little brain tries to warp reality to make this one little piece fit into your airplanes fuel fantasies. You can't explain it without lying to yourself. But stop lying to us.
Your question: What actually struck the Pentagon?
Your answer: An airplane filled with passengers and fuel struck the Pentagon. There is no evidence for anything else.
My response:
-- sure I could humiliate you with photos of the initial hole at the pentagon but its been done before. Go and look for yourself, it is as clear as day that there are no impact markings from the wings and engines. But I am done providing you with readily available material. Go look yourself. Trust your eyes. Gee ya think the gov't would release the footage if it put this whole thing to bed don't ya?
Your question: Did a plane crash in SW PA?
Your answer: Yes, a plane crashed in SW PA.
My response:
--So if a plane crashes in SW PA that means it wasn't an inside job? Even if the passengers did overtake the terrorists and the plane did crash that does not mean this wasn't an inside job. Get it?
You're scared, I get it. It's a scary world. But I am letting you know I don't care. Get with the program pal. The guys have pulled a number on all of us. You're on the same side as me, you just don't know it. They have a term for people like you...useful idiot.
stop being one.
#911truthwinning
Now I'm going to ask you a few questions...
ready?
What is the OS? Is it the sum of all reports commissioned by the Federal Government or is it just those which you vehemently disagree with?
I have plenty of room to criticize the lack of evidence of demolition in the many claims made for such.
No one has proven CD and "science" has not shown that "the WTC could not have fallen by jet fuel and office fires."
Only a few people support the theory that the collapse of the towers was a result of a controlled demolition.
Scientists require something called evidence and the truthers haven't come up with any.
The entire "truther" movement is scattered and disjointed because there are no consistent theories that they can agree on.
The chances of a reinvestigation are about zero.
To have such, one would need new evidence to convince Congress to fund it.
There isn't any
"It didn't look right" and "it defied the laws of physics" aren't evidence;
They are, in your favorite words, opinions, usually by people whose sole expertise consists of watching disaster movies.
Keep telling yourself that you are # winning
However, since you brought it up we can say the same about your OS believers they cannot agree on anything either.
The chances of a reinvestigation are about zero.
Originally posted by SphinxMontreal
The chances of a reinvestigation are about zero.
For your sake, I sure hope so.
Why would you hope so for my sake? Any reinvestigation would likely focus on previously unaddressed intelligence and agency failures and not on the CD theories.
Jones' case for CD is far from compelling; it is actually more innuendo and bad analytical chemistry than anything else.
The rest of the theories seem to be mainly based on videos of the collapse that have been edited by the addition of various colored lines and arrows that purport to show something or other, such as the "laws of physics" being violated. These are easily dismissed as gravity continues to work in spite of the best efforts of some theorists.
On several threads, I and other posters have asked the question of what happens when a reinvestigation says that we got things right the first time? Will we have to listen to demands for re-reinvestigations until everyone has their pet theory confirmed?
The 911 writers will make careers out of this and milk the believers by selling books and CD's to their audience, just as they are doing now.
Originally posted by impressme
On several threads, I and other posters have asked the question of what happens when a reinvestigation says that we got things right the first time? Will we have to listen to demands for re-reinvestigations until everyone has their pet theory confirmed?
Stop winning and complaining, you do not know the outcome of a second investigation.
This is what many of you debunkers do, always assuming the worst against people who want answers.
Originally posted by yyyyyyyyyy
reply to post by TrickoftheShade
Remember Bush and Afghanistan? It's the rhetoric of Western powers which is the greatest evil here.
As a general point you seem like someone who believes in the war on terror?edit on 14-3-2011 by yyyyyyyyyy because: (no reason given)