It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Oh yes, because places without government agents attempting to preserve order are such amazing places to live. Somalia comes to mind. I hear the weather is fantastic this time of year. Just be mindful of the bullets whizzing by everywhere.
Originally posted by seeashrink
reply to post by surfnow2
Thanks, you and I know the truth, but I'm afraid our words are falling on deaf ears. I had a guy in another forum that didn't believe or agree with the things that I said. It just so happened that he lived in my state, NC, and drove down to go on a ride along. By the end of the night he was singing a different tune. Thanks again for the support and all that you do. Keep your head down brother.
Seeashrink
This is the absolute WORST idea I have have heard on this thread...as an LEO that has been stalked by gang members before I can say that I take my families safety VERY seriously. I WILL NOT have another drive by at my house by some thug whose cousin I arrested. I have a new house now that is not in my name nor do I have a home phone line or any bills in my name, I always do a few loops to check for tails on the way home. Most officers know how to recognize a tail and it will not end well for you.
Originally posted by commdogg
reply to post by Azp420
HA. And what is different about Afghanistan now than BEFORE we got there. Oh yeah there's guys with the stars and stripes on their sleeves mixing it up with the local warlords, instead of just the warlords mixing it up with each other. Are you asserting they were better off under the Taliban, as they were such a fantastic model for human rights and all?
I know exactly what would happen if the government machine were turned off. The strong would subjugate the weak and set up their own government. Probably one not as nice and fluffy as the one we have now either. Viva la Revolucion!
Comm
Originally posted by LegalTender
I dare any officers posting on this thread to argue their points with me. I assure you, you will lose.
Originally posted by seeashrink
reply to post by daddio
"Sovereigns/freemen have blown up buildings, killed cops, held up banks, printed counterfiet money, inpersonated foreign diplomats, made counterfiet licenses, license plates, Social Security cards, and ID cards. They clog the courts with useless paperwork. You folks sound a lot more like part of the problem than the solution".
Interestingly enough, I didn't see any freeman jumping in to address this. Or is this just the ugly side that you don't talk about?
Seeashrink
Dear Police Officer and/or Member of the U.S. Military:
This retired officer served proudly in the U.S. Armed Forces for twenty years, which included three overseas assignments. I spent 11½ years in the USAF as an enlisted member, and 8½ years in the U.S. Army (warrant officer and commissioned officer). While in the USAF, I flew on numerous hazardous duty reconnaissance missions against the Soviet Union. On a number of occasions we had Soviet fighter aircraft intercept us over international waters and try to shoot us down. I also flew on a few combat reconnaissance missions off the coast of Vietnam. Those of us who flew these missions knew that there was a risk to our lives; however, we never really thought much about it because we "had a job to do." We had been taught that the Communists were our enemies, and that we had to keep an eye on them to see what they were up to. It was not until after I retired that I found out that while one hand of America was working to halt the advance of Communism, there was another hand of America that was supporting Communism. And that is why we fought both Korea and Vietnam Wars with "one hand tied behind our backs." The rich, power elite were controlling were controlling both sides - often selling arms to both sides - and always reaping big war profits. Their agenda included driving both sides deeper into debt, sometimes to gain control of mineral resources, and always to make the world fit into the mold that they wanted.
This retired officer loves this Republic, our U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights, and the American people. I subscribe to the motto: "The true patriot does not love his government. The true patriot loves his country and watches his government." Our founding fathers wisely placed strict limits on the federal government - their intentions being that most government functions were to take place at the LOCAL level, and that included the police. There is absolutely NOTHING in the Constitution that authorizes national police. Our founding fathers knew that "power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely." They did not want too much power accumulating in the federal government. They also knew that guns in the hands of the American citizens would greatly reduce the chances of tyrannical government raising its ugly head here in America - and that is why they placed the 2nd Amendment (the Right to keep and bear Arms) into the Bill of Rights. They believed that if government was doing what was right, then it had nothing to fear from its citizens. They also knew that tyrannical governments always try to disarm their citizens. But what is this that we see in America today? We see our government infringing more and more on our Right to keep and bear Arms. Why? It is very well documented that those areas in America that have the strictest gun control laws also have the highest violent crime rates (e.g., Washington, D.C.)! Those areas of the country that have large numbers of armed citizens also have the least amount of violent crime. So why is our government pushing gun control so hard?
And that brings us to the main reason for this letter - the motto of the fine folks at Aid & Abet Police & Military Newsletter is this: "Tyranny cannot come to the door of any American unless it comes in uniform." As their outstanding book, Operation Vampire Killer 2000 (OVK 2000) points out, it is the police officer, National Guardsman, reservist, and/or active duty military member who will be ordered by their government to disarm the citizens "for their own good" ...and who will be used as "cannon fodder" to do so... because there will be some patriotic Americans who will recognize that surrendering their firearms will remove the "last restraint" of government. As OVK 2000 states: "It is time to seriously consider what each of us will do when these global elitists in our government instruct OFFICERS and NATIONAL GUARDSMEN to go forth and take the guns away from the armed, good people of your city or town... ‘FOR THEIR OWN GOOD.’" OVK 2000 also asks our American police officers and military personnel, "Which way will your own gun face when the orders are issued? Will you protect the people you have sworn to protect? Or, will you do what other patriotic officers from other countries have done to their countrymen, ‘OBEDIENTLY JUST FOLLOW ORDERS’?" Of course, there is some likelihood that many of our police and military personnel will be sent overseas to "police" people in foreign lands, while foreign troops will be brought into America to "police" the American people.
Originally posted by seeashrink
reply to post by daddio
A little melodramatic here don't you think? When are you going to get it through your head that line of thinking is delusional? Go out break the law. Sell weed by the kilo on the street corner, it's a no victim crime right. Drive your car on the sidewalk. Shoot your nieghbor when his dog poops in your yard. Then when the cops come, shout out your common law crap....while you're behind bars. It's just not going to happen. Even if I agreed with you, I would still have enough sense to relize it's a pipe dream.
Seeashrink
Originally posted by seeashrink
reply to post by Loki Lyesmyth
No fear, just a statement of fact if you mess with or endanger a cops family. I would think this would be common sense.
Seeashrink
Are you asserting they were better off under the Taliban, as they were such a fantastic model for human rights and all?
I know exactly what would happen if the government machine were turned off. The strong would subjugate the weak and set up their own government.
Go out break the law.
Sell weed by the kilo on the street corner, it's a no victim crime right.
Drive your car on the sidewalk.
Shoot your nieghbor when his dog poops in your yard.
Then when the cops come, shout out your common law crap
Even if I agreed with you, I would still have enough sense to relize it's a pipe dream.
Originally posted by lastrebel
While i would never harm or even threaten someones family how do you think it makes us feel when you come in our homes waving guns arround screaming at our kids shooting our dogs, etc.
Why should ONLY YOUR FAMILY be safe from this kind of abuse?