Originally posted by seeashrink
Also, I cannot speak for every situation, but will try to address the most common ones, i.e. traffic stops, license checks, street interviews.
The most common place that you are going be confronted by an officer is at a traffic stop.
Already you've identified some of the major problems with the police, and one reason they should all be fired and replaced with nobody. The problems
are implicit in your premise there, and you just gloss over it as if it's just the way things are without any alternative. The most common place that
anyone SHOULD be "confronted by an officer" is at the scene of a heinous crime or the scene of their arrest. The police should be doing what they
claim they're doing, protecting and serving, not pulling over people for no light over their license plate or any of the other million excuses a cop
can legally use to unconstitutionally harass people. They also shouldn't be butting their noses into every dispute between any people and arbitrarily
hand down edicts based on who they think is right and who they think is wrong. Any reasonably competent cop can always find something to charge a
person with, even if they have to lie a little. And they don't have to come up with any charges for, what, 48 hours? People aren't angels. Until
they are, I don't trust anyone who tells me they're in charge. I'll take my chances against the "bag guys" if it means I never have to see
another "good guy" like this.
Originally posted by seeashrink
When you are stopped by an officer you have to assume that he had a valid reason, otherwise a halfway decent attorney will get the case thrown out of
court and the officer looks like an idiot and his reputation in the courtroom starts to dwindle. He cannot afford this because it is a career
ender.
This of course is the way it works in television dramas and other fairy tales, but of course in the real world the police all stick together and cover
each other's mistakes, the court is more than willing to patch even more holes in the dike and the media is perfectly happy to repeat verbatim any
statements given to them by either the police or the courts. An innocent person doesn't stand a chance in our legal system. Casual criminals also
don't stand a chance. The ones that really thrive are the criminals who plan ahead and exploit the system to harm their victims.
Originally posted by seeashrink
Your rights when stopped: First, you must realize that driving is a privilege not a right.
This is a quaint notion that would make any of the monarchs of old green with envy. To say that operating a vehicle is a "privilege" that the state
gives you is the height of lunacy. This reminds me of something I read recently, a parent was outraged because his child was being taught in civics
class that rights are special privileges the government gives you. Using this as your premise it's no wonder you wish to encourage people to just
"go along to get along". That attitude is common in prison, if cops had their way the whole world would be one big prison with everyone either in
prison or working as a guard.
Originally posted by seeashrink
Now, what if you run into the super trooper that doesn’t care about your rights, and we all know that they are out there. If you run into this
individual, do what he says and be polite. Note his name and his badge number and any other identifying features. After you have calmed down write out
a complete statement of the events including dates, times, and all that was said. Use his chain of command or Internal affairs division to report
him.
I'm sure you know very well what a useless approach this is. The police are a tight-knit group, trying to get any one of them to assist you in filing
charges against another one is the fool's errand. All this tactic will accomplish is ensuring more harassment in the future, unless it gets to the
point that it starts embarrassing the department.
Originally posted by seeashrink
If this idiot will violate your rights, then arguing with him on the side of the road is a bad idea. You could end up getting tazed or worse.
If the officer ask you to step out of the car, follow the instructions. He may want to pat you down for weapons for his own safety; this is his right
and is granted by law.
This is the attitude typically parroted by cop and cop sympathizers. Don't ever defend yourself, especially if you're being abused by police,
because they'll just make it worse. What sort of lesson is that? Obey or be punished worse for not being obedient? Why is the "officer" legally
allowed extreme measures (forcibly detaining people, waving guns around, frisking people, handcuffing them) to ensure HIS safety during a VOLUNTARY
ACTION by that "officer", when the victim of that "officer" is offered no legal self defense?
Originally posted by seeashrink
What if you have broken the law? Perhaps there’s a roach or some seeds in your car’s ashtray. If you are caught, be honest.
Yes, of course, the police all want you to tell on yourself so they have less work to do.
Originally posted by seeashrink
There are more cocky officers with bad attitudes than there are good ones.
All in all this post makes a very convincing case for getting rid of the police entirely. It reminds me of a saying I once heard, that the best
government is a good czar, the worst government is a bad czar, bad czars outnumber good czars so the best government is NO CZAR.