NASA smoking gun clear photo of structures on moon(direct link from their server)

Originally posted by Phage
The "building" is called Mons La Hire, located in Mare Imbrium
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/0acd9791957b.jpg[/atsimg]

Phage nailed it on page 1...

that's all folks...

reply to post by Awalltheone


I could've sworn there was a McDonalds on there by now.

Originally posted by thesneakiod
reply to post by Phage

 

Umm, yeh square. Which when zoomed in, clearly isn't..... I was hardly talking about that pic anyway.

Are you interested in conspiracies at all phage? (especially space/ufo stuff) I don't understand why you spend all your time here debunking.

ahah the thousand $$ question. cant wait for teh answer.
Oh and btw people i finally see a majority of people in a thread thinking the same way as i do related to this subject, and his debunkers. ^^

Originally posted by thesneakiod
reply to post by Phage

 

Umm, yeh square. Which when zoomed in, clearly isn't..... I was hardly talking about that pic anyway.

Are you interested in conspiracies at all phage? (especially space/ufo stuff) I don't understand why you spend all your time here debunking.

I value Phage as debunker. Most of the videos and pictures people put up are full of crap, some are just oversights. As a believer of aliens and UFOs, I would, and do, try to debunk everything that comes into the forums, because then, for the ones we can't debunk, we have legitimate evidence that would hold up against any attempts at debunking.

Phage, keep on showing these dim wits what its all about. I know you want to believe.

reply to post by HunkaHunka


Funny how this picture reminds me of the famous "face" from the latest blurred pictures.
I have to agree with another poster, old pics from NASA are way more sharp than recent ones.
HD tv my arse. -_-

Originally posted by Phage
The "building" is called Mons La Hire, located in Mare Imbrium

Mons La Hire

That sounds more like a French Brothel... is that connected to the Lunar Hilton that was planned by Barron Hilton in the 60's?

Phase One: 3 Story 100 Room Underground - Began 1967 with Press release Phase Two: 5,000 Rom Luxury Hotel under Glass Dome Drawings Complete March 1998 Peter Inston Initial Investment for Phase Two: 300,000.00 Capacity in Final Phase: 5000 Beds Support: A school, a hospital and a multi denominational church Features: Sand beaches on artificial moon lakes, hotel internal water Recycling system Final Phase Completion: 2050 Class: Luxury Hotel - Lunar Hilton Hotel Price: Special offer for one week: $25,000 Euro (Transportation Extra) "Chairman of the US company Hilton Hotels, Barron Hilton (not Baron Hilton) at a space conference in 1967. The optimistic "Can do" spirit that existed in the US space industry in those days during the build-up to Apollo 11 is particularly notable. That discussion continued in the press for a few years, with senior NASA figures making speeches about the possibility of ordinary people being able to buy trips to space. But it faded away as the space shuttle project was begun and almost everyone waited, relying on that to reduce launch costs. The speech is made more notable by the announcement early in 1998 by Hilton International (a British company) of their plans for a "Lunar Hilton" - using water from the "polar ice" to make an artificial beach. " - Press Conference 1967

www.heise.de...

Mate, if you were completely sane an absolutley right about the moon.... then there are alien structures all over the Sahara. (check out Google Earth sometime.

Now, you must know what this means, and it aint that there are aliens structures in the Sahara!

reply to post by Awalltheone


Rocks, not buildings but rocks and craters, you people make me wonder how our species got anywhere with this type of thinking everywhere you look

Its solidified swamp gas. What else could it be?

On a serious note, can't we all agree that the amount of information relating to this area of info has been coming out at an exponential rate as of now? and not even information that was covered up or hidden

This pic would be described as about the 23,213,345 lunar epoch. That is all it is. I don't see how you drew any significance from this pic.

reply to post by FoosM


Man the Crater is spewing out some Liquid or slush or something!! (look at the shadow) amazing.

This is the best photo for me. Its not lava is it? what could it be.

Big Trash Shoot for the Ones living inside??

Thanks Foos

I don't know. Unlike Mars there is no weathering on the moon. Like Mars some lines seem straight and there are curves but, in both cases, there are some lines which do not seem in any way a part of any design but random. An artificial structure on the moon should look just it did when constructed unless some violent artificial action partially knocked it down. Another point I have is why out in the seeming middle of nowhere with no apparent regard for local topography?

We will never know for sure until some human takes a personal look and what they report is not censored.

Im pretty sure thats geological in nature. But who knows?

I would like to add that NASA has been caught red handed many times tampering with photos. Martin stubbs wrote a book and made a documentry called "NASA's secret transmissions -the smoking gun" ! Now I cant vouch for the book ,but I happened to catch the full documentry on winamps COSMOSTV.org. Its boring at times simply because he plays the same clips over n over again. However ,he plays them at different speeds and with different filters to prove its not say, ice particles.

Basically he was a cable station manager that had an extra dish. He asked permission to use it and pointed it at NASA's sattelite (which is supposed to be encrypted) ! Over a period of 5 years ,he amassed a very intresting amount of data. He recieved all data being beamed to earth from shuttle missions,the space station and a few other sources before it was tampered with. In the documentry ,he goes on to prove that NASA has a 20 minute delay in all there feeds ,including live feed. He listens in on a conversation with the russian space agency when they first discovered the delay on there end. He managed to record the whole conversation between the 2 agencies. The russians thought it was them ,NASA says what are you talking about. The russians had there own feed and knew we were lieing to them. He then shows data that was released to the public after they tampered with it ,and then shows you the original footage. Many video feeds that were recorded clearly show NASA zooming in on objects and cutting the live feed to the public ,but his footage is still being recorded in real time directly from the source and not filtered. He shows how live feed stationary cameras that are high def one day are magically all staticy and black and white the next. He also points out to you how they use this static to filter certain video feeds within the 20 minute delay time, While his footage is still high def in color and untampered with. Amazing stuff really !

Also ,in the disclosure project .There is a lady that worked at NASA as a defense something or other. She goes on to say that she was witness to this tampering and the means they use to cover photo/video up. Where the room is located at NASA ,who is allowed in it ,and the extreme measures they take to make sure the information being manipulated in that room is never made public.

Originally posted by trailertrash
Unlike Mars there is no weathering on the moon.

Actually, there is - although "weathering" probably isn't the right term. There are several causes of erosion. The most prominent is the steady stream of micrometeors. Over the eons, they slowly but inexorably break down the jagged crater rims and mountains, softening their features and giving them their rounded appearance.

Also, heating and contraction caused by two-week "days" followed by two-week "nights" causes expansion and contraction in boulders on the surface. Over time, this can turn small flaws into fissures, which can eventually crack and break-off bits of rock.

Some of the things the Apollo astronauts left on the surface are vulnerable to UV from the sun. Most significant among these are the flags planted by each mission. These were ordinary nylon flags, purchased from a Houston hardware store and modified with a hem on top for the extension bar that made them appear to fly in a non-existant breeze. UV quickly bleaches and breaks-down nylon. This, coupled with the thermal erosion, has probably caused all of the flags to crumble to dust. Four of the flags are now probably nothing more than faint trails of white dust beneath the flagpole extension bars. Apollo 12's flag had a broken latch on its extension bar, so it hung downwards, and is probably a little white pile. Apollo 11's flag is a special case: It got knocked-over when the Eagle blasted-off from Tranquility Base. If it got laid-out flat on the ground, then maybe - just maybe - as it decomposed the pattern of stars and stripes may have been preserved, and are still visible.

It's a nice thought, anyway.

All we are is dust in the wind...

What a ridiculous thread title. These stupid mars/moon photos of "buildings" and "ships" never even look anything like a building or ship and look surprisingly like o yea.. geological features. Same as youd find all over the earth from a far away black and white camera shot with lighting we're not used to.
Come on people en.wikipedia.org...

reply to post by Phage


Blatant obfuscation.

How dense do they think we are, really?

No smart-a&* answers please.

reply to post by Odessy


Someone needs a reality check. Show me posts by the man himself where he demonstrates a position of 'wanting to believe' anything outside the absolute mainstream.

I value him at times for debunking blatant c(*p, but then quite often he 'debunks' something with the most far-fetched mainstream stance ever.

My point? Stop ascribing false traits to a person you obviously don't know.

You know... If I was looking for some proof that NASA was hiding something... and doing a better job than the old blur technique... I could use these images as perfect example of something that looks out of place being pasted over something else



I mean just look at the edges on this first one... looks like its almost floating






They just don't look right and neither do all the weird shadow images

But hey

Originally posted by Saint Exupery

Originally posted by trailertrash
Unlike Mars there is no weathering on the moon.

Actually, there is - although "weathering" probably isn't the right term. There are several causes of erosion.

Yeah like the raging Lunar dust storms that cause the sunset sunrise Crepuscular rays I bet those suckers could shred a flag in minutes

Originally posted by FoosM
The following picture comes from straight from NASA and it shows clear anomalies.
If anybody cant see them, well I dont know what to say, take a course in basic geology?
No I'm kidding, but seriously, its photos like these that makes many question NASA's
story. Do anyone see whats wrong? I will first direct you to the crater. I first didnt see it either.

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/42149a9e3df2.gif[/atsimg]

Well whats wrong with the picture is that its not an actual a picture of the moon.
They claim it to be a plaster of paris model.

The accompanying NASA photo, shows a portion of the plaster-of-paris landing site model used during training simulations. The area shown is centered on the landing target and shows Cone Crater at the lower right.

So here is the question, how can anyone of us know which are the real pictures of the moon, or the fake version made by NASA? And how can we tell if the anomalies are not simply mistakes from the plaster of paris?

See, if NASA wanted to hide something on the moon, they wouldnt have to release publicly real photos of the moon, they could release photos of the fake landscape made by up of plaster of paris, or a paper mache moon.