It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

NASA smoking gun clear photo of structures on moon(direct link from their server)

page: 7
79
<< 4  5  6    8  9  10 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 15 2010 @ 04:53 PM
link   
reply to post by 7anked
 


Is that an antennae in the image?

Kind of looks like what a space elevator might look like.



posted on Nov, 15 2010 @ 05:00 PM
link   
reply to post by _Highlander_
 


Yep, it looks like an antenna... What I thought was a mound of rocks at the end is just part of the antenna. Mystery solved



posted on Nov, 15 2010 @ 05:07 PM
link   
reply to post by FoosM
 


To me it looks like the crater shadow doesn't match all other shadows ...



posted on Nov, 15 2010 @ 05:35 PM
link   
reply to post by Awalltheone
 

Still just looks like rocks, maybe an asteroid.



posted on Nov, 15 2010 @ 05:44 PM
link   
I have to admit that these are neat geological features of the moon, but I don't see how they can be interpreted as artificial structures of some kind... I think it's safe to say that it's the furthest thing from a "smoking gun".



posted on Nov, 15 2010 @ 05:47 PM
link   

Originally posted by spiritualzombie
reply to post by 7anked
 


Here's another photo of that strange cork screw feature... It shows up in a few of the photos... They seem to always lead into what looks like a mound of rocks. Anyone know what that is?



Here's another


And another:

edit on 15-11-2010 by spiritualzombie because: (no reason given)


In the 2nd photo that looks like a natural feature of some sort on the moon that looks a bit odd maybe due to lighting, the 1st and 3rd look like something rising from the moon's surface,
if you flick between all three images quickly you'll see that it's at a different spot on or near a different crater each time, conclusion: it's an antenna and part of the spacecraft.

kinda disappointed it's not a space elevator

cheers mob
edit on 15-11-2010 by mobtek because: (no reason given)

edit on 15-11-2010 by mobtek because: elevator!




posted on Nov, 15 2010 @ 05:56 PM
link   
How is that the smoking gun? You have no proof of structures on the moon. All i can see is the surface of the moon...



posted on Nov, 15 2010 @ 05:59 PM
link   
reply to post by zorgon
 



That color is a closer shade to my photo of the moon ...


Ooooh...I think I remember that "photo"!! Was rolled out a few years back, here, yes? (I think it will be somewhere in the archives, perhaps in a J. Lear post??)

If I recall correctly...it was the "sky" that had a distinct "yellow" cast....almost exactly the same as Caterpillar-brand heavy duty Earthmoving equipment, wasn't it?

In fact wasn't it from some sort of Caterpillar, Inc. promotional "visualization" of a possible mining operation on the Moon, some time in the foreseeable future? (At least, what they seem to "hope for"....this is what my memory tells me....correct me if my memory proves to be faulty....)


Ah hah!! Seems it is still on their website.....www.cat.com...

If you go there, you can scroll throught their "thumbnails" (well, bigger really) of their "stories", then play the video. Here's the direct link to the video:

www.cat.com...

(Although, it appears that only their little still image to represent the video will show the "yellow" sky, when you mouse over it.....?)



edit on 15 November 2010 by weedwhacker because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 15 2010 @ 06:32 PM
link   
Debunkers and no debunkers theres a book called"The secret story of NASA" IS AVERY entertaining book.All about megalitic constructions on the moon and in mars.Remember Ronald Reagan proyect STAR WARS???
I wonder what was so frigthning to triger a speech in front of the U N,ABOUT such topic??? huh oh the megalitic constructions are measured in miles tall.



posted on Nov, 15 2010 @ 06:36 PM
link   
I get an "untrusted connection" from both those URL's weedwhacker...



posted on Nov, 15 2010 @ 06:42 PM
link   
reply to post by Jocko Flocko
 


Yes....I did too, and I soldiered on (took the hit first, just in case....no problemo, it IS their site. Not sure why they have certificate problems, not my field of expertise, sorry....)

Still, maybe there's a safer workaround? Might be that it's a bit older, on their server? I don't know Jack about some of that technical stuff.....ont he Interwebs....

"It's a series of TUBES!!!


(Former Alaska Senator Ted Stevens....R.I.P....)



posted on Nov, 15 2010 @ 07:35 PM
link   
Wow, that is definately cool...

There are a lot of anomalies on the moon and Mars and every other moon/planet etc. Almost too many to believe that not one of them is in fact artificial, also taking just a few of NASA's astronaut's own UFO sigthings on their missions, one would suspect that if some of them are E.T., then surely, they've been to the moon and Mars and many other places and given they then have the capability of space travel, they've likely had it for a very long time, which would again give credence to them having built certain structures perhaps for scientific research of their own.



posted on Nov, 15 2010 @ 07:36 PM
link   
Why look for weird stuff on the moon?

It's a foregone conclusion that if anything were found via these methods, be it mountain or spaceship, will always be attributed to an image processing artifact.

Proof will *never* be in the form of images. Especially images that are transmitted over great distances and processed by one (or more) agencies.

There's no way you could ever hope to find anything that will absolutely convince everyone.



posted on Nov, 15 2010 @ 08:01 PM
link   
The thing that bothers me the most is how much BETTER the old pictures look than the new ones... They are crisp with good contrast etc then you see the newer pics and they look like someone took the blending tool from photo shop and went NUTS there are no definitive lines anywhere everything is washed out etc.

I just find it so interesting ...



posted on Nov, 15 2010 @ 08:13 PM
link   

Originally posted by prepared4truth
Hmmm... very odd.

But I would like to say that it isn't necessarily an artificial structure. It could very well be naturally formed craters. Just look at the weird stuff our landforms make on planet Earth by themselves.

Who knows though, right?


a crater is convex.



posted on Nov, 15 2010 @ 08:20 PM
link   

Originally posted by thesneakiod
reply to post by Phage
 

Are you interested in conspiracies at all phage? (especially space/ufo stuff) I don't understand why you spend all your time here debunking.


If you can't defend your evidence, do not attack another member. He does not need to qualify to you why he is here. I'm sure Phage is interested in conspiracies. Ones that are true. How about you? Are you not better off for knowing the anomaly is a natural structure? Or would you prefer to drown in ignorance?


Originally posted by thesneakiod
There are a handful of posters on this site who spend ALL their time just debunking, and not getting "involved" in the topic, for me, on a site like this, is just plain weird.


Debunking the topic is a measure of involvement. Is there some part of that you're having problems comprehending? There's nothing weird about showing you the truth or pointing you in the right direction. You seem quite upset that Phage has actually helped people in the thread distinguish the difference between truth and fantasy. Why are you taking this so personally?


Originally posted by thesneakiod
It's almost like it's their job.............


.. And here comes the veiled ad hominem... It's almost like you're trying to discredit him by planting that seed of doubt in other peoples heads. He must be a dis-info agent or government shill right? Please! Your posting in this matter personifies another bad attitude on these boards that needs to be corrected by staff.

IRM

edit on 15/11/10 by InfaRedMan because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 15 2010 @ 08:37 PM
link   
reply to post by prepared4truth
 


That would be plausible, except NASA made the mistake of lying about Astronauts NOT experiencing wind. All those great features of Earth are made because of erosional forces like wind and water...without them, there shouldn't be anything on the moon that resembles Earth.

To me this proves one of two things; NASA is lying about the forces on the moon (thus lying about men being there in the 60's and 70's) OR NASA is covering up whats up there or what the found when they went there in the 60's-70's. Either way, NASA is fawked and we get a cool discovery.

I'd say these are interesting, but what I think someone needs to do, is turn the Chandra X-Ray observatory at the moon and X-ray it. We already KNOW that it's internal masses are not centralized like Earth...which means it didn't 'FORM' like Earth...which means, it's not from here. X-RAY THE MOON! LOL



posted on Nov, 15 2010 @ 08:57 PM
link   

Originally posted by weedwhacker
Ooooh...I think I remember that "photo"!! Was rolled out a few years back, here, yes? (I think it will be somewhere in the archives, perhaps in a J. Lear post??)


No I meant my super full moon in living color photo... the one I even have people at NASA telling me its the best moon pic they have see


But I will pass on that Caterpillar one to John with your regards... I think he will love it especyally since Cat is making mining equipment for NASA




posted on Nov, 15 2010 @ 08:59 PM
link   

Originally posted by Jocko Flocko
I get an "untrusted connection" from both those URL's weedwhacker...


Its okay it's safe.... you get that same warning when you hit .mil sites



posted on Nov, 15 2010 @ 09:07 PM
link   
reply to post by Phage
 


Hey Phage..did you notice that when you click on the "external Image" that you posted...

and zoom in on the rock, you can see the letter "C" on the ground....lol..

The rock at lower middle with the shadow..btw..
edit on 15-11-2010 by baddmove because: cause i can



new topics

top topics



 
79
<< 4  5  6    8  9  10 >>

log in

join